Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Dasong Li
dblp:217/2940
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
4as first author
8since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0001-6766-7529ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 4 first-author · 8 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 6 · 3 first-author · 6 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
6 papers |
Image and video processing · 79% Multimedia systems and quality of experience · 11% Computational photography and imaging · 11% | |
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
3D vision · 44% Generative modeling · 22% Representation and self-supervised learning · 21% |
Topics — the 17 heaviest of 19, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › 3D vision › motion estimation
optical flow |
1.3 | 2 | 2023 | VideoFlow: Exploiting Temporal Cues for Multi-frame Optical Flow Estimation · ICCV 2023 FlowFormer++: Masked Cost Volume Autoencoding for Pretraining Optical Flow Estimation · CVPR 2023 |
Image and video processing
image restoration |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | A Unified Conditional Framework for Diffusion-based Image Restoration · NeurIPS 2023 IDR: Self-Supervised Image Denoising via Iterative Data Refinement · CVPR 2022 |
Image and video processing › image restoration
image denoising |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | Efficient Burst Raw Denoising with Variance Stabilization and Multi-frequency Denoising Network · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2022 IDR: Self-Supervised Image Denoising via Iterative Data Refinement · CVPR 2022 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
short video understanding |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Delving Deep into Engagement Prediction of Short Videos · ECCV (54) 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
conditional diffusion model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | A Unified Conditional Framework for Diffusion-based Image Restoration · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | A Unified Conditional Framework for Diffusion-based Image Restoration · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › self-supervised representation learning
masked autoencoder |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | FlowFormer++: Masked Cost Volume Autoencoding for Pretraining Optical Flow Estimation · CVPR 2023 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
motion estimation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | VideoFlow: Exploiting Temporal Cues for Multi-frame Optical Flow Estimation · ICCV 2023 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › motion estimation › optical flow
multi-frame optical flow |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | VideoFlow: Exploiting Temporal Cues for Multi-frame Optical Flow Estimation · ICCV 2023 |
Image and video processing › video restoration
video deblurring |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | A Simple Baseline for Video Restoration with Grouped Spatial-Temporal Shift · CVPR 2023 |
Image and video processing › video restoration
video denoising |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | A Simple Baseline for Video Restoration with Grouped Spatial-Temporal Shift · CVPR 2023 |
Image and video processing
video restoration |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | A Simple Baseline for Video Restoration with Grouped Spatial-Temporal Shift · CVPR 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › latent representation learning
degradation representation learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Learning Degradation Representations for Image Deblurring · ECCV (18) 2022 |
Computational photography and imaging › image acquisition
burst photography |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Efficient Burst Raw Denoising with Variance Stabilization and Multi-frequency Denoising Network · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2022 |
Image and video processing › image restoration
image deblurring |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Learning Degradation Representations for Image Deblurring · ECCV (18) 2022 |
Image and video processing › image restoration › image denoising
raw image denoising |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Efficient Burst Raw Denoising with Variance Stabilization and Multi-frequency Denoising Network · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2022 |
Computational photography and imaging › image signal processing
noise model |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | IDR: Self-Supervised Image Denoising via Iterative Data Refinement · CVPR 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
deep learning · 1.5u-net · 1.3transformer · 0.7patch-splitting · 0.7patch splitting · 0.7motion propagation · 0.7masked autoencoding · 0.7iterative flow refinement · 0.7grouped spatial-temporal shift · 0.7cost volume · 0.72d convolution · 0.7variance stabilization · 0.6noisier-noisy dataset construction · 0.6multi-frequency denoising network · 0.6iterative training · 0.6fast approximation · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Delving Deep into Engagement Prediction of Short Videos
Dasong Li, Baili Lu, Hongsheng Li 0001, Sizhuo Ma, Gurunandan Krishnan, Jian Wang 0100 |
ECCV (54) | 1 |
| 2023 | A Simple Baseline for Video Restoration with Grouped Spatial-Temporal ShiftabstractVideo restoration, which aims to restore clear frames from degraded videos, has numerous important applications. The key to video restoration depends on utilizing inter-frame information. However, existing deep learning methods often rely on complicated network architectures, such as optical flow estimation, deformable convo-lution, and cross-frame self-attention layers, resulting in high computational costs. In this study, we propose a sim-ple yet effective framework for video restoration. Our approach is based on grouped spatial-temporal shift, which is a lightweight and straightforward technique that can implicitly capture inter-frame correspondences for multi-frame aggregation. By introducing grouped spatial shift, we attain expansive effective receptive fields. Combined with basic 2D convolution, this simple framework can effectively aggregate inter-frame information. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our framework outperforms the previous state-of-the-art method, while using less than a quarter of its computational cost, on both video deblurring and video denoising tasks. These results indicate the potential for our approach to significantly reduce computational overhead while maintaining high-quality results. Code is avaliable at https://github.com/dasonglil/Shift-Net. Dasong Li, Xiaoyu Shi 0002, Yi Zhang 0108, Ka Chun Cheung, Simon See, Xiaogang Wang 0001, Hongwei Qin, Hongsheng Li 0001 |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2023 | FlowFormer++: Masked Cost Volume Autoencoding for Pretraining Optical Flow EstimationabstractFlowFormer [24] introduces a transformer architecture into optical flow estimation and achieves state-of-the-art performance. The core component of FlowFormer is the transformer-based cost-volume encoder. Inspired by the recent success of masked autoencoding (MAE) pretraining in unleashing transformers' capacity of encoding visual representation, we propose Masked Cost Volume Autoencoding (MCVA) to enhance FlowFormer by pretraining the cost-volume encoder with a novel MAE scheme. Firstly, we introduce a block-sharing masking strategy to prevent masked information leakage, as the cost maps of neighboring source pixels are highly correlated. Secondly, we propose a novel pre-text reconstruction task, which encourages the cost-volume encoder to aggregate long-range information and ensures pretraining-finetuning consistency. We also show how to modify the FlowFormer architecture to accommodate masks during pretraining. Pretrained with MCVA, FlowFormer++ ranks 1st among published methods on both Sintel and KITTI-2015 benchmarks. Specifically, FlowFormer++ achieves 1.07 and 1.94 average end-point error (AEPE) on the clean and final pass of Sintel benchmark, leading to 7.76% and 7.18% error reductions from FlowFormer. FlowFormer++ obtains 4.52 F1-all on the KITTI-2015 test set, improving FlowFormer by 0.16. Xiaoyu Shi 0002, Dasong Li, Manyuan Zhang, Ka Chun Cheung, Simon See, Hongwei Qin, Jifeng Dai, Hongsheng Li 0001 |
CVPR | 3 |
| 2023 | VideoFlow: Exploiting Temporal Cues for Multi-frame Optical Flow EstimationabstractWe introduce VideoFlow, a novel optical flow estimation framework for videos. In contrast to previous methods that learn to estimate optical flow from two frames, VideoFlow concurrently estimates bi-directional optical flows for multiple frames that are available in videos by sufficiently exploiting temporal cues.We first propose a TRi-frame Optical Flow (TROF) module that estimates bi-directional optical flows for the center frame in a three-frame manner. The information of the frame triplet is iteratively fused onto the center frame. To extend TROF for handling more frames, we further propose a MOtion Propagation (MOP) module that bridges multiple TROFs and propagates motion features between adjacent TROFs. With the iterative flow estimation refinement, the information fused in individual TROFs can be propagated into the whole sequence via MOP. By effectively exploiting video information, VideoFlow presents extraordinary performance, ranking 1st on all public benchmarks. On the Sintel benchmark, VideoFlow achieves 1.649 and 0.991 average end-point-error (AEPE) on the final and clean passes, a 15.1% and 7.6% error reduction from the best published results (1.943 and 1.073 from FlowFormer++). On the KITTI-2015 benchmark, VideoFlow achieves an F1-all error of 3.65%, a 19.2% error reduction from the best published result (4.52% from FlowFormer++). Code is released at https://github.com/XiaoyuShi97/VideoFlow. Xiaoyu Shi 0002, Weikang Bian, Dasong Li, Manyuan Zhang, Ka Chun Cheung, Simon See, Hongwei Qin, Jifeng Dai, Hongsheng Li 0001 |
ICCV | 4 |
| 2023 | A Unified Conditional Framework for Diffusion-based Image RestorationabstractDiffusion Probabilistic Models (DPMs) have recently shown remarkable performance in image generation tasks, which are capable of generating highly realistic images. When adopting DPMs for image restoration tasks, the crucial aspect lies in how to integrate the conditional information to guide the DPMs to generate accurate and natural output, which has been largely overlooked in existing works. In this paper, we present a unified conditional framework based on diffusion models for image restoration. We leverage a lightweight UNet to predict initial guidance and the diffusion model to learn the residual of the guidance. By carefully designing the basic module and integration module for the diffusion model block, we integrate the guidance and other auxiliary conditional information into every block of the diffusion model to achieve spatially-adaptive generation conditioning. To handle high-resolution images, we propose a simple yet effective inter-step patch-splitting strategy to produce arbitrary-resolution images without grid artifacts. We evaluate our conditional framework on three challenging tasks: extreme low-light denoising, deblurring, and JPEG restoration, demonstrating its significant improvements in perceptual quality and the generalization to restoration tasks. The code will be released at https://zhangyi-3.github.io/project/UCDIR/. Yi Zhang 0108, Xiaoyu Shi 0002, Dasong Li, Xiaogang Wang 0001, Jian Wang 0100, Hongsheng Li 0001 |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2022 | IDR: Self-Supervised Image Denoising via Iterative Data RefinementabstractThe lack of large-scale noisy-clean image pairs restricts supervised denoising methods' deployment in actual applications. While existing unsupervised methods are able to learn image denoising without ground-truth clean images, they either show poor performance or work under impractical settings (e.g., paired noisy images). In this paper, we present a practical unsupervised image denoising method to achieve state-of-the-art denoising performance. Our method only requires single noisy images and a noise model, which is easily accessible in practical raw image denoising. It performs two steps iteratively: (1) Constructing a noisier-noisy dataset with random noise from the noise model; (2) training a model on the noisier-noisy dataset and using the trained model to refine noisy images to obtain the targets used in the next round. We further approximate our full iterative method with a fast algorithm for more efficient training while keeping its original high performance. Experiments on real-world, synthetic, and correlated noise show that our proposed unsupervised denoising approach has superior performances over existing unsupervised methods and competitive performance with supervised methods. In addition, we argue that existing denoising datasets are of low quality and contain only a small number of scenes. To evaluate raw image denoising performance in real-world applications, we build a high-quality raw image dataset SenseNoise-500 that contains 500 real-life scenes. The dataset can serve as a strong benchmark for better evaluating raw image denoising. Code and dataset will be released11https://github.com/zhangyi-3/IDR Yi Zhang 0108, Dasong Li, Ka Lung Law, Xiaogang Wang 0001, Hongwei Qin, Hongsheng Li 0001 |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2022 | Learning Degradation Representations for Image Deblurring
Dasong Li, Yi Zhang 0108, Ka Chun Cheung, Xiaogang Wang 0001, Hongwei Qin, Hongsheng Li 0001 |
ECCV (18) | 1 |
| 2022 | Efficient Burst Raw Denoising with Variance Stabilization and Multi-frequency Denoising Network
Dasong Li, Yi Zhang 0108, Ka Lung Law, Xiaogang Wang 0001, Hongwei Qin, Hongsheng Li 0001 |
Int. J. Comput. Vis. | 1 |