Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Gianluigi Silvestri

dblp:217/3077 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-author · 5 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Generative modeling · 50% Learning theory · 22% Deep learning architectures and training · 14%

Topics — the 13 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
1.722025
VCT: Training Consistency Models with Variational Noise Coupling · ICML 2025
Manifolds, Random Matrices and Spectral Gaps: The geometric phases of generative diffusion · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling
normalizing flow
1.122022
Embedded-model flows: Combining the inductive biases of model-free deep learning and explicit probabilistic modeling · ICLR 2022
Automatic variational inference with cascading flows · ICML 2021
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
consistency model
0.912025
VCT: Training Consistency Models with Variational Noise Coupling · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › regularization
consistency training
0.912025
VCT: Training Consistency Models with Variational Noise Coupling · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling
flow matching
0.912025
VCT: Training Consistency Models with Variational Noise Coupling · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory › inductive bias
manifold hypothesis
0.912025
Manifolds, Random Matrices and Spectral Gaps: The geometric phases of generative diffusion · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
score-based generative model
0.912025
Manifolds, Random Matrices and Spectral Gaps: The geometric phases of generative diffusion · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical learning theory
statistical physics of learning
0.912025
Manifolds, Random Matrices and Spectral Gaps: The geometric phases of generative diffusion · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
autoencoder
0.712023
Deterministic training of generative autoencoders using invertible layers · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Learning theory
inductive bias
0.612022
Embedded-model flows: Combining the inductive biases of model-free deep learning and explicit probabilistic modeling · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference
automated variational inference
0.512021
Automatic variational inference with cascading flows · ICML 2021
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference
structured variational inference
0.512021
Automatic variational inference with cascading flows · ICML 2021
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference
0.512021
Automatic variational inference with cascading flows · ICML 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

variational autoencoder · 0.9statistical physics · 0.9random matrix theory · 0.9noise-data coupling · 0.9learned encoder · 0.9invertible layers · 0.7deep learning · 0.6normalizing flow · 0.5highway flow · 0.5amortized inference · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Manifolds, Random Matrices and Spectral Gaps: The geometric phases of generative diffusion
abstract
In this paper, we investigate the latent geometry of generative diffusion models under the manifold hypothesis. For this purpose, we analyze the spectrum of eigenvalues (and singular values) of the Jacobian of the score function, whose discontinuities (gaps) reveal the presence and dimensionality of distinct sub-manifolds. Using a statistical physics approach, we derive the spectral distributions and formulas for the spectral gaps under several distributional assumptions, and we compare these theoretical predictions with the spectra estimated from trained networks. Our analysis reveals the existence of three distinct qualitative phases during the generative process: a trivial phase; a manifold coverage phase where the diffusion process fits the distribution internal to the manifold; a consolidation phase where the score becomes orthogonal to the manifold and all particles are projected on the support of the data. This `division of labor' between different timescales provides an elegant explanation of why generative diffusion models are not affected by the manifold overfitting phenomenon that plagues likelihood-based models, since the internal distribution and the manifold geometry are produced at different time points during generation.
Enrico Ventura, Beatrice Achilli, Gianluigi Silvestri, Carlo Lucibello, Luca Ambrogioni
ICLR3
2025 VCT: Training Consistency Models with Variational Noise Coupling
abstract
Consistency Training (CT) has recently emerged as a strong alternative to diffusion models for image generation. However, non-distillation CT often suffers from high variance and instability, motivating ongoing research into its training dynamics. We propose Variational Consistency Training (VCT), a flexible and effective framework compatible with various forward kernels, including those in flow matching. Its key innovation is a learned noise-data coupling scheme inspired by Variational Autoencoders, where a data-dependent encoder models noise emission. This enables VCT to adaptively learn noise-to-data pairings, reducing training variance relative to the fixed, unsorted pairings in classical CT. Experiments on multiple image datasets demonstrate significant improvements: our method surpasses baselines, achieves state-of-the-art FID among non-distillation CT approaches on CIFAR-10, and matches SoTA performance on ImageNet 64x64 with only two sampling steps. Code is available at https://github.com/sony/vct.
Gianluigi Silvestri, Luca Ambrogioni, Chieh-Hsin Lai, Yuhta Takida, Yuki Mitsufuji
ICML1
2023 Deterministic training of generative autoencoders using invertible layers
Gianluigi Silvestri, Daan Roos, Luca Ambrogioni
ICLR1
2022 Embedded-model flows: Combining the inductive biases of model-free deep learning and explicit probabilistic modeling
Gianluigi Silvestri, Emily Fertig, Dave Moore, Luca Ambrogioni
ICLR1
2021 Automatic variational inference with cascading flows
abstract
The automation of probabilistic reasoning is one of the primary aims of machine learning. Recently, the confluence of variational inference and deep learning has led to powerful and flexible automatic inference methods that can be trained by stochastic gradient descent. In particular, normalizing flows are highly parameterized deep models that can fit arbitrarily complex posterior densities. However, normalizing flows struggle in highly structured probabilistic programs as they need to relearn the forward-pass of the program. Automatic structured variational inference (ASVI) remedies this problem by constructing variational programs that embed the forward-pass. Here, we combine the flexibility of normalizing flows and the prior-embedding property of ASVI in a new family of variational programs, which we named cascading flows. A cascading flows program interposes a newly designed highway flow architecture in between the conditional distributions of the prior program such as to steer it toward the observed data. These programs can be constructed automatically from an input probabilistic program and can also be amortized automatically. We evaluate the performance of the new variational programs in a series of structured inference problems. We find that cascading flows have much higher performance than both normalizing flows and ASVI in a large set of structured inference problems.
Luca Ambrogioni, Gianluigi Silvestri, Marcel van Gerven
ICML2