EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Alexander Grabner
dblp:217/3122
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0002-5544-1896ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 4 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
3D vision · 50% Face, body and person analysis · 43% Representation and self-supervised learning · 7% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Rendering · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis › human pose estimation
3d pose estimation |
1.1 | 3 | 2020 | Geometric Correspondence Fields: Learned Differentiable Rendering for 3D Pose Refinement in the Wild · ECCV (16) 2020 GP2C: Geometric Projection Parameter Consensus for Joint 3D Pose and Focal Length Estimation in the Wild · ICCV 2019 3D Pose Estimation and 3D Model Retrieval for Objects in the Wild · CVPR 2018 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › pose estimation
pose refinement |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Geometric Correspondence Fields: Learned Differentiable Rendering for 3D Pose Refinement in the Wild · ECCV (16) 2020 |
Rendering
differentiable rendering |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Geometric Correspondence Fields: Learned Differentiable Rendering for 3D Pose Refinement in the Wild · ECCV (16) 2020 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d shape analysis
3d shape retrieval |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | 3D Pose Estimation and 3D Model Retrieval for Objects in the Wild · CVPR 2018 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › object pose estimation › 6d object pose estimation
category-level object pose estimation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | 3D Pose Estimation and 3D Model Retrieval for Objects in the Wild · CVPR 2018 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
camera calibration |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | GP2C: Geometric Projection Parameter Consensus for Joint 3D Pose and Focal Length Estimation in the Wild · ICCV 2019 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › camera calibration
focal length estimation |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | GP2C: Geometric Projection Parameter Consensus for Joint 3D Pose and Focal Length Estimation in the Wild · ICCV 2019 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › visual representation › image representation › image descriptor
image descriptor learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | 3D Pose Estimation and 3D Model Retrieval for Objects in the Wild · CVPR 2018 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › metric learning
multi-view metric learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | 3D Pose Estimation and 3D Model Retrieval for Objects in the Wild · CVPR 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
geometric correspondence fields · 0.9differentiable rendering · 0.9reprojection error minimization · 0.4geometric optimization · 0.4deep learning · 0.4metric learning · 0.3convolutional neural network · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Geometric Correspondence Fields: Learned Differentiable Rendering for 3D Pose Refinement in the Wild
Alexander Grabner, Yaming Wang, Peizhao Zhang, Peihong Guo, Tong Xiao 0003, Peter Vajda, Peter M. Roth, Vincent Lepetit |
ECCV (16) | 1 |
| 2019 | Location Field Descriptors: Single Image 3D Model Retrieval in the WildabstractWe present Location Field Descriptors, a novel approach for single image 3D model retrieval in the wild. In contrast to previous methods that directly map 3D models and RGB images to an embedding space, we establish a common low-level representation in the form of location fields from which we compute pose invariant 3D shape descriptors. Location fields encode correspondences between 2D pixels and 3D surface coordinates and, thus, explicitly capture 3D shape and 3D pose information without appearance variations which are irrelevant for the task. This early fusion of 3D models and RGB images results in three main advantages: First, the bottleneck location field prediction acts as a regularizer during training. Second, major parts of the system benefit from training on a virtually infinite amount of synthetic data. Finally, the predicted location fields are visually interpretable and unblackbox the system. We evaluate our proposed approach on three challenging real-world datasets (Pix3D, Comp, and Stanford) with different object categories and significantly outperform the state-of-the-art by up to 20% absolute in multiple 3D retrieval metrics. Alexander Grabner, Peter M. Roth, Vincent Lepetit |
3DV | 1 |
| 2019 | GP2C: Geometric Projection Parameter Consensus for Joint 3D Pose and Focal Length Estimation in the WildabstractWe present a joint 3D pose and focal length estimation approach for object categories in the wild. In contrast to previous methods that predict 3D poses independently of the focal length or assume a constant focal length, we explicitly estimate and integrate the focal length into the 3D pose estimation. For this purpose, we combine deep learning techniques and geometric algorithms in a two-stage approach: First, we estimate an initial focal length and establish 2D-3D correspondences from a single RGB image using a deep network. Second, we recover 3D poses and refine the focal length by minimizing the reprojection error of the predicted correspondences. In this way, we exploit the geometric prior given by the focal length for 3D pose estimation. This results in two advantages: First, we achieve significantly improved 3D translation and 3D pose accuracy compared to existing methods. Second, our approach finds a geometric consensus between the individual projection parameters, which is required for precise 2D-3D alignment. We evaluate our proposed approach on three challenging real-world datasets (Pix3D, Comp, and Stanford) with different object categories and significantly outperform the state-of-the-art by up to 20% absolute in multiple different metrics. Alexander Grabner, Peter M. Roth, Vincent Lepetit |
ICCV | 1 |
| 2018 | 3D Pose Estimation and 3D Model Retrieval for Objects in the WildabstractWe propose a scalable, efficient and accurate approach to retrieve 3D models for objects in the wild. Our contribution is twofold. We first present a 3D pose estimation approach for object categories which significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art on Pascal3D+. Second, we use the estimated pose as a prior to retrieve 3D models which accurately represent the geometry of objects in RGB images. For this purpose, we render depth images from 3D models under our predicted pose and match learned image descriptors of RGB images against those of rendered depth images using a CNN-based multi-view metric learning approach. In this way, we are the first to report quantitative results for 3D model retrieval on Pascal3D+, where our method chooses the same models as human annotators for 50% of the validation images on average. In addition, we show that our method, which was trained purely on Pascal3D+, retrieves rich and accurate 3D models from ShapeNet given RGB images of objects in the wild. Alexander Grabner, Peter M. Roth, Vincent Lepetit |
CVPR | 1 |