Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Chen Zeno

dblp:217/3359 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Generative modeling · 36% Learning theory · 32% Trustworthy machine learning · 18%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Image and video processing · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
0.912025
When Diffusion Models Memorize: Inductive Biases in Probability Flow of Minimum-Norm Shallow Neural Nets · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory › neural network theory
memorization and generalization
0.912025
When Diffusion Models Memorize: Inductive Biases in Probability Flow of Minimum-Norm Shallow Neural Nets · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › privacy
memorization in generative models
0.912025
When Diffusion Models Memorize: Inductive Biases in Probability Flow of Minimum-Norm Shallow Neural Nets · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › score-based model
probability flow
0.912025
When Diffusion Models Memorize: Inductive Biases in Probability Flow of Minimum-Norm Shallow Neural Nets · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory › neural network theory
neural network function space
0.712023
How do Minimum-Norm Shallow Denoisers Look in Function Space? · NeurIPS 2023
Image and video processing › image restoration
denoising
0.212023
How do Minimum-Norm Shallow Denoisers Look in Function Space? · NeurIPS 2023
Image and video processing
image reconstruction
0.212023
How do Minimum-Norm Shallow Denoisers Look in Function Space? · NeurIPS 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

representation cost · 1.3minimum-norm interpolation · 1.3MMSE estimation · 1.3shallow ReLU network · 0.9score flow · 0.9minimum-norm training · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 When Diffusion Models Memorize: Inductive Biases in Probability Flow of Minimum-Norm Shallow Neural Nets
abstract
While diffusion models generate high-quality images via probability flow, the theoretical understanding of this process remains incomplete. A key question is when probability flow converges to training samples or more general points on the data manifold. We analyze this by studying the probability flow of shallow ReLU neural network denoisers trained with minimal $\ell^2$ norm. For intuition, we introduce a simpler score flow and show that for orthogonal datasets, both flows follow similar trajectories, converging to a training point or a sum of training points. However, early stopping by the diffusion time scheduler allows probability flow to reach more general manifold points. This reflects the tendency of diffusion models to both memorize training samples and generate novel points that combine aspects of multiple samples, motivating our study of such behavior in simplified settings. We extend these results to obtuse simplex data and, through simulations in the orthogonal case, confirm that probability flow converges to a training point, a sum of training points, or a manifold point. Moreover, memorization decreases when the number of training samples grows, as fewer samples accumulate near training points.
Chen Zeno, Hila Manor, Greg Ongie, Nir Weinberger, Tomer Michaeli, Daniel Soudry
ICML1
2023 How do Minimum-Norm Shallow Denoisers Look in Function Space?
abstract
Neural network (NN) denoisers are an essential building block in many common tasks, ranging from image reconstruction to image generation. However, the success of these models is not well understood from a theoretical perspective. In this paper, we aim to characterize the functions realized by shallow ReLU NN denoisers --- in the common theoretical setting of interpolation (i.e., zero training loss) with a minimal representation cost (i.e., minimal $\ell^2$ norm weights). First, for univariate data, we derive a closed form for the NN denoiser function, find it is contractive toward the clean data points, and prove it generalizes better than the empirical MMSE estimator at a low noise level. Next, for multivariate data, we find the NN denoiser functions in a closed form under various geometric assumptions on the training data: data contained in a low-dimensional subspace, data contained in a union of one-sided rays, or several types of simplexes. These functions decompose into a sum of simple rank-one piecewise linear interpolations aligned with edges and/or faces connecting training samples. We empirically verify this alignment phenomenon on synthetic data and real images.
Chen Zeno, Greg Ongie, Yaniv Blumenfeld, Nir Weinberger, Daniel Soudry
NeurIPS1
2021 Task-Agnostic Continual Learning Using Online Variational Bayes With Fixed-Point Updates
abstract
Catastrophic forgetting is the notorious vulnerability of neural networks to the changes in the data distribution during learning. This phenomenon has long been considered a major obstacle for using learning agents in realistic continual learning settings. A large body of continual learning research assumes that task boundaries are known during training. However, only a few works consider scenarios in which task boundaries are unknown or not well defined: task-agnostic scenarios. The optimal Bayesian solution for this requires an intractable online Bayes update to the weights posterior. We aim to approximate the online Bayes update as accurately as possible. To do so, we derive novel fixed-point equations for the online variational Bayes optimization problem for multivariate gaussian parametric distributions. By iterating the posterior through these fixed-point equations, we obtain an algorithm (FOO-VB) for continual learning that can handle nonstationary data distribution using a fixed architecture and without using external memory (i.e., without access to previous data). We demonstrate that our method (FOO-VB) outperforms existing methods in task-agnostic scenarios. FOO-VB Pytorch implementation is available at https://github.com/chenzeno/FOO-VB.
Chen Zeno, Itay Golan, Elad Hoffer, Daniel Soudry
Neural Comput.1