Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ieva Kazlauskaite
dblp:217/3621
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0001-9690-0887ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 60% Optimization for machine learning · 40% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational science and engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Random Grid Neural Processes for Parametric Partial Differential Equations · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process
neural processes |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Random Grid Neural Processes for Parametric Partial Differential Equations · ICML 2023 |
Computational science and engineering › partial differential equations
parametric PDEs |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Random Grid Neural Processes for Parametric Partial Differential Equations · ICML 2023 |
Computational science and engineering › scientific machine learning
physics-informed machine learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Random Grid Neural Processes for Parametric Partial Differential Equations · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Modulating Surrogates for Bayesian Optimization · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
surrogate model |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Modulating Surrogates for Bayesian Optimization · ICML 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
variational inference · 1.3grid invariant convolutional networks · 1.3noise modeling · 0.4latent gaussian process · 0.4gaussian process · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Random Grid Neural Processes for Parametric Partial Differential EquationsabstractWe introduce a new class of spatially stochastic physics and data informed deep latent models for parametric partial differential equations (PDEs) which operate through scalable variational neural processes. We achieve this by assigning probability measures to the spatial domain, which allows us to treat collocation grids probabilistically as random variables to be marginalised out. Adapting this spatial statistics view, we solve forward and inverse problems for parametric PDEs in a way that leads to the construction of Gaussian process models of solution fields. The implementation of these random grids poses a unique set of challenges for inverse physics informed deep learning frameworks and we propose a new architecture called Grid Invariant Convolutional Networks (GICNets) to overcome these challenges. We further show how to incorporate noisy data in a principled manner into our physics informed model to improve predictions for problems where data may be available but whose measurement location does not coincide with any fixed mesh or grid. The proposed method is tested on a nonlinear Poisson problem, Burgers equation, and Navier-Stokes equations, and we provide extensive numerical comparisons. We demonstrate significant computational advantages over current physics informed neural learning methods for parametric PDEs while improving the predictive capabilities and flexibility of these models. Arnaud Vadeboncoeur, Ieva Kazlauskaite, Yanni Papandreou, Fehmi Cirak, Mark A. Girolami, Ömer Deniz Akyildiz |
ICML | 2 |
| 2022 | Aligned Multi-Task Gaussian ProcessabstractMulti-task learning requires accurate identification of the correlations between tasks. In real-world time-series, tasks are rarely perfectly temporally aligned; traditional multi-task models do not account for this and subsequent errors in correlation estimation will result in poor predictive performance and uncertainty quantification. We introduce a method that automatically accounts for temporal misalignment in a unified generative model that improves predictive performance. Our method uses Gaussian processes (GPs) to model the correlations both within and between the tasks. Building on the previous work by Kazlauskaite et al. (2019), we include a separate monotonic warp of the input data to model temporal misalignment. In contrast to previous work, we formulate a lower bound that accounts for uncertainty in both the estimates of the warping process and the underlying functions. Also, our new take on a monotonic stochastic process, with efficient path-wise sampling for the warp functions, allows us to perform full Bayesian inference in the model rather than MAP estimates. Missing data experiments, on synthetic and real time-series, demonstrate the advantages of accounting for misalignments (vs standard unaligned method) as well as modelling the uncertainty in the warping process (vs baseline MAP alignment approach). Olga Mikheeva, Ieva Kazlauskaite, Adam Hartshorne, Hedvig Kjellström, Carl Henrik Ek, Neill D. F. Campbell |
AISTATS | 2 |
| 2020 | Monotonic Gaussian Process FlowsabstractWe propose a new framework for imposing monotonicity constraints in a Bayesian non-parametric setting based on numerical solutions of stochastic differential equations. We derive a nonparametric model of monotonic functions that allows for interpretable priors and principled quantification of hierarchical uncertainty. We demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed model by providing competitive results to other probabilistic monotonic models on a number of benchmark functions. In addition, we consider the utility of a monotonic random process as a part of a hierarchical probabilistic model; we examine the task of temporal alignment of time-series data where it is beneficial to use a monotonic random process in order to preserve the uncertainty in the temporal warpings. Ivan Ustyuzhaninov, Ieva Kazlauskaite, Carl Henrik Ek, Neill D. F. Campbell |
AISTATS | 2 |
| 2020 | Modulating Surrogates for Bayesian OptimizationabstractBayesian optimization (BO) methods often rely on the assumption that the objective function is well-behaved, but in practice, this is seldom true for real-world objectives even if noise-free observations can be collected. Common approaches, which try to model the objective as precisely as possible, often fail to make progress by spending too many evaluations modeling irrelevant details. We address this issue by proposing surrogate models that focus on the well-behaved structure in the objective function, which is informative for search, while ignoring detrimental structure that is challenging to model from few observations. First, we demonstrate that surrogate models with appropriate noise distributions can absorb challenging structures in the objective function by treating them as irreducible uncertainty. Secondly, we show that a latent Gaussian process is an excellent surrogate for this purpose, comparing with Gaussian processes with standard noise distributions. We perform numerous experiments on a range of BO benchmarks and find that our approach improves reliability and performance when faced with challenging objective functions. Erik Bodin, Markus Kaiser 0001, Ieva Kazlauskaite, Zhenwen Dai, Neill W. Campbell, Carl Henrik Ek |
ICML | 3 |
| 2020 | Compositional uncertainty in deep Gaussian processesabstractGaussian processes (GPs) are nonparametric priors over functions. Fitting a GP implies computing a posterior distribution of functions consistent with the observed data. Similarly, deep Gaussian processes (DGPs) should allow us to compute a posterior distribution of compositions of multiple functions giving rise to the observations. However, exact Bayesian inference is intractable for DGPs, motivating the use of various approximations. We show that the application of simplifying mean-field assumptions across the hierarchy leads to the layers of a DGP collapsing to near-deterministic transformations. We argue that such an inference scheme is suboptimal, not taking advantage of the potential of the model to discover the compositional structure in the data. To address this issue, we examine alternative variational inference schemes allowing for dependencies across different layers and discuss their advantages and limitations. Ivan Ustyuzhaninov, Ieva Kazlauskaite, Markus Kaiser 0001, Erik Bodin, Neill D. F. Campbell, Carl Henrik Ek |
UAI | 2 |
| 2019 | Gaussian Process Latent Variable Alignment LearningabstractWe present a model that can automatically learn alignments between high-dimensional data in an unsupervised manner. Our proposed method casts alignment learning in a framework where both alignment and data are modelled simultaneously. Further, we automatically infer groupings of different types of sequences within the same dataset. We derive a probabilistic model built on non-parametric priors that allows for flexible warps while at the same time providing means to specify interpretable constraints. We demonstrate the efficacy of our approach with superior quantitative performance to the state-of-the-art approaches and provide examples to illustrate the versatility of our model in automatic inference of sequence groupings, absent from previous approaches, as well as easy specification of high level priors for different modalities of data. Ieva Kazlauskaite, Carl Henrik Ek, Neill D. F. Campbell |
AISTATS | 1 |