Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Eleanor C. Law
dblp:217/5315
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
0000-0001-5591-7316ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure prediction
de novo structure prediction |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Sequential search leads to faster, more efficient fragment-based de novo protein structure prediction · Bioinform. 2018 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein structure prediction |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Sequential search leads to faster, more efficient fragment-based de novo protein structure prediction · Bioinform. 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
pseudo-greedy search · 0.3decoy generation · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Sequential search leads to faster, more efficient fragment-based de novo protein structure predictionabstractMotivation: Most current de novo structure prediction methods randomly sample protein conformations and thus require large amounts of computational resource. Here, we consider a sequential sampling strategy, building on ideas from recent experimental work which shows that many proteins fold cotranslationally. Results: We have investigated whether a pseudo-greedy search approach, which begins sequentially from one of the termini, can improve the performance and accuracy of de novo protein structure prediction. We observed that our sequential approach converges when fewer than 20 000 decoys have been produced, fewer than commonly expected. Using our software, SAINT2, we also compared the run time and quality of models produced in a sequential fashion against a standard, non-sequential approach. Sequential prediction produces an individual decoy 1.5-2.5 times faster than non-sequential prediction. When considering the quality of the best model, sequential prediction led to a better model being produced for 31 out of 41 soluble protein validation cases and for 18 out of 24 transmembrane protein cases. Correct models (TM-Score > 0.5) were produced for 29 of these cases by the sequential mode and for only 22 by the non-sequential mode. Our comparison reveals that a sequential search strategy can be used to drastically reduce computational time of de novo protein structure prediction and improve accuracy. Availability and implementation: Data are available for download from: http://opig.stats.ox.ac.uk/resources. SAINT2 is available for download from: https://github.com/sauloho/SAINT2. Contact: [email protected]. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Saulo Henrique Pires de Oliveira, Eleanor C. Law, Jiye Shi, Charlotte M. Deane |
Bioinform. | 2 |