System identification in control theory aims to approximate dynamical systems from trajectory data. While neural networks have demonstrated strong predictive accuracy, they often fail to preserve critical physical properties such as stability and typically assume stationary dynamics, limiting their applicability under distribution shifts. Existing approaches generally address either stability or adaptability in isolation, lacking a unified framework that ensures both. We propose LILAD (Learning In-Context Lyapunov-stable Adaptive Dynamics), a novel framework for system identification that jointly guarantees adaptability and stability. LILAD simultaneously learns a dynamics model and a Lyapunov function through in-context learning (ICL), explicitly accounting for parametric uncertainty. Trained across a diverse set of tasks, LILAD produces a stability-aware, adaptive dynamics model alongside an adaptive Lyapunov certificate. At test time, both components adapt to a new system instance using a short trajectory prompt, which enables fast generalization. To rigorously ensure stability, LILAD also computes a state-dependent attenuator that enforces a sufficient decrease condition on the Lyapunov function for any state in the new system instance. This mechanism extends stability guarantees even under out-of-distribution and out-of-task scenarios. We evaluate LILAD on benchmark autonomous systems and demonstrate that it outperforms adaptive, robust, and non-adaptive baselines in predictive accuracy.

This paper addresses the problem of Neural Network (NN) based adaptive stability certification in a dynamical system. The state-of-the-art methods, such as Neural Lyapunov Functions (NLFs), use NN-based formulations to assess the stability of a non-linear dynamical system and compute a Region of Attraction (ROA) in the state space. However, under parametric uncertainty, if the values of system parameters vary over time, the NLF methods fail to adapt to such changes and may lead to conservative stability assessment performance. We circumvent this issue by integrating Model Agnostic Meta-learning (MAML) with NLFs and propose meta-NLFs. In this process, we train a meta-function that adapts to any parametric shifts and updates into an NLF for the system with new test-time parameter values. We demonstrate the stability assessment performance of meta-NLFs on some standard benchmark autonomous dynamical systems.

Prompt online detection of anomalies induced by malicious attacks enhances the efficacy of real-time operation and mitigation of attack, an indispensable part of any cyber-physical system (CPS) management. This article proposes a novel online rapid detection scheme that continuously monitors the data packet stream and infers the sequence of probability distributions, estimated as histograms, and alerts when a change in the histogram is detected, reporting both the attack as well as an estimate of its instant of commencement. A statistical data-driven attack model is proposed and employed that is general enough to represent two ubiquitous types of attacks on CPS: 1) replay and 2) bias-injection. The proposed detection framework relies on the fact that CPSs possess well-defined dynamics that are affected by quasistationary noise, which allows the histogram sequences of the system data packets to converge (to different distributions under the presence of the attack versus the absence of attack). The proposed online scheme detects an attack, and estimates the attack commencement time by relying on the computed distance between real-time estimated histogram versus apriori learned nominal histogram. Our formulation further sheds light on two different attack initiation-time-based subcases, “early” (attack starts before sufficient data of nominal behavior was collected to allow its histogram sequence to be closer to its nominal value) versus “late.” The designed algorithm of our scheme has linear time complexities in the dimension of data packets and algorithm parameters, which makes it suited for rapid detection. The proposed algorithm is implemented and validated on two real supervisory control and data acquisition system datasets, where a low detection delay demonstrates the effectiveness of the scheme.

There exists a gulf between the rhetoric in visualisation research about the significance of uncertainty and the inclusion of representations of uncertainty in visualisations used in practice. The graphical representation of uncertainty information has emerged as a problem of great importance in visualisation research. This contribution presents a survey of 286 uncertainty visualisation research publications. All publications are categorised with regard to publication type, publication venue, application domain, target user, and evaluation type. We present an interactive web-based browser that facilitates easy visual search and exploration of the publications included in the survey. We conclude that uncertainty visualisation is severely limited by the quality and scope of uncertainty data, by the limited confidence in the data, and by the perceptual and cognitive confusion that the graphical representation of the data can generate.

In this paper, we list the goals for and the pros and cons of guidance, and we discuss the role that it can play not only in key low-level visualization tasks but also the more sophisticated model-generation tasks of visual analytics. Recent advances in artificial intelligence, particularly in machine learning, have led to high hopes regarding the possibilities of using automatic techniques to perform some of the tasks that are currently done manually using visualization by data analysts. However, visual analytics remains a complex activity, combining many different subtasks. Some of these tasks are relatively low-level, and it is clear how automation could play a role—for example, classification and clustering of data. Other tasks are much more abstract and require significant human creativity, for example, linking insights gleaned from a variety of disparate and heterogeneous data artifacts to build support for decision making. In this paper, we outline the potential applications of guidance, as well as the inputs to guidance. We discuss challenges in implementing guidance, including the inputs to guidance systems and how to provide guidance to users. We propose potential methods for evaluating the quality of guidance at different phases in the analytic process and introduce the potential negative effects of guidance as a source of bias in analytic decision making.