Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yu Takagi
dblp:217/8879
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-0503-785XORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Language models and text generation · 65% Generative modeling · 35% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 78% Medical and health informatics · 22% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
computational neuroscience |
1.2 | 2 | 2024 | Unveiling Multi-level and Multi-modal Semantic Representations in the Human Brain using Large Language Models · EMNLP 2024 Demixed shared component analysis of neural population data from multiple brain areas · NeurIPS 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
alignment |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Massive Supervised Fine-tuning Experiments Reveal How Data, Layer, and Training Factors Shape LLM Alignment Quality · EMNLP 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Massive Supervised Fine-tuning Experiments Reveal How Data, Layer, and Training Factors Shape LLM Alignment Quality · EMNLP 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model › large language model adaptation
supervised fine-tuning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Massive Supervised Fine-tuning Experiments Reveal How Data, Layer, and Training Factors Shape LLM Alignment Quality · EMNLP 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | High-resolution image reconstruction with latent diffusion models from human brain activity · CVPR 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
latent diffusion model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | High-resolution image reconstruction with latent diffusion models from human brain activity · CVPR 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience › neuroinformatics
brain decoding |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | High-resolution image reconstruction with latent diffusion models from human brain activity · CVPR 2023 |
Medical and health informatics
neuroimaging |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | High-resolution image reconstruction with latent diffusion models from human brain activity · CVPR 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational neuroscience
neural population analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Demixed shared component analysis of neural population data from multiple brain areas · NeurIPS 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model
large language model representation |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Unveiling Multi-level and Multi-modal Semantic Representations in the Human Brain using Large Language Models · EMNLP 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
image reconstruction |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | High-resolution image reconstruction with latent diffusion models from human brain activity · CVPR 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
large language model · 1.5fMRI decoding · 1.5stable diffusion · 1.3functional magnetic resonance imaging · 1.3supervised fine-tuning · 0.9perplexity analysis · 0.9layer-wise analysis · 0.9demixed shared component analysis · 0.4component analysis · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Massive Supervised Fine-tuning Experiments Reveal How Data, Layer, and Training Factors Shape LLM Alignment QualityabstractSupervised fine-tuning (SFT) is a critical step in aligning large language models (LLMs) with human instructions and values, yet many aspects of SFT remain poorly understood.We trained a wide range of base models on a variety of datasets including code generation, mathematical reasoning, and general-domain tasks, resulting in 1,000+ SFT models under controlled conditions.We then identified the dataset properties that matter most and examined the layer-wise modifications introduced by SFT.Our findings reveal that some training-task synergies persist across all models while others vary substantially, emphasizing the importance of model-specific strategies.Moreover, we demonstrate that perplexity consistently predicts SFT effectiveness, often surpassing superficial similarity between the training data and the benchmark, and that mid-layer weight changes correlate most strongly with performance gains.We release these 1,000+ SFT models and benchmark results to accelerate further research.All resources are available at https://github. Yuto Harada, Yusuke Yamauchi, Yusuke Oda, Yohei Oseki, Yusuke Miyao, Yu Takagi |
EMNLP | 6 |
| 2024 | Unveiling Multi-level and Multi-modal Semantic Representations in the Human Brain using Large Language ModelsabstractYuko Nakagi, Takuya Matsuyama, Naoko Koide-Majima, Hiroto Q. Yamaguchi, Rieko Kubo, Shinji Nishimoto, Yu Takagi. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2024. Yuko Nakagi, Takuya Matsuyama, Naoko Koide-Majima, Hiroto Yamaguchi, Rieko Kubo, Shinji Nishimoto, Yu Takagi |
EMNLP | 7 |
| 2023 | High-resolution image reconstruction with latent diffusion models from human brain activityabstractReconstructing visual experiences from human brain activity offers a unique way to understand how the brain represents the world, and to interpret the connection between computer vision models and our visual system. While deep generative models have recently been employed for this task, reconstructing realistic images with high semantic fidelity is still a challenging problem. Here, we propose a new method based on a diffusion model (DM) to reconstruct images from human brain activity obtained via functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). More specifically, we rely on a latent diffusion model (LDM) termed Stable Diffusion. This model reduces the computational cost of DMs, while preserving their high generative performance. We also characterize the inner mechanisms of the LDM by studying how its different components (such as the latent vector of image Z, conditioning inputs C, and different elements of the denoising U-Net) relate to distinct brain functions. We show that our proposed method can reconstruct high-resolution images with high fidelity in straight-forward fashion, without the need for any additional training and fine-tuning of complex deep-learning models. We also provide a quantitative interpretation of different LDM components from a neuroscientific perspective. Overall, our study proposes a promising method for reconstructing images from human brain activity, and provides a new framework for understanding DMs. Please check out our webpage at https://sites.google.com/view/stablediffusion-withbrain/. Yu Takagi, Shinji Nishimoto |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2020 | Demixed shared component analysis of neural population data from multiple brain areasabstractRecent advances in neuroscience data acquisition allow for the simultaneous recording of large populations of neurons across multiple brain areas while subjects perform complex cognitive tasks. Interpreting these data requires us to index how task-relevant information is shared across brain regions, but this is often confounded by the mixing of different task parameters at the single neuron level. Here, inspired by a method developed for a single brain area, we introduce a new technique for demixing variables across multiple brain areas, called demixed shared component analysis (dSCA). dSCA decomposes population activity into a few components, such that the shared components capture the maximum amount of shared information across brain regions while also depending on relevant task parameters. This yields interpretable components that express which variables are shared between different brain regions and when this information is shared across time. To illustrate our method, we reanalyze two datasets recorded during decision-making tasks in rodents and macaques. We find that dSCA provides new insights into the shared computation between different brain areas in these datasets, relating to several different aspects of decision formation. Yu Takagi, Steven W. Kennerley, Laurence T. Hunt |
NeurIPS | 1 |