Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Euirim Choi

dblp:217/9399 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
User interface design and tools · 38% Usability and user experience research · 25% Human-AI interaction · 25%
Network and information security
2 papers
Privacy and data protection · 68% Usable security · 16% Web and mobile security · 16%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program synthesis and code generation · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
User interface design and tools
end-user programming
0.512021
DIY assistant: a multi-modal end-user programmable virtual assistant · PLDI 2021
Privacy and data protection › web tracking
third-party tracking
0.412019
Oh, the Places You've Been! User Reactions to Longitudinal Transparency About Third-Party Web Tracking and Inferencing · CCS 2019
Haptics and multimodal interaction
multimodal interaction
0.112021
DIY assistant: a multi-modal end-user programmable virtual assistant · PLDI 2021
Web and mobile security
browser extension
0.112019
Oh, the Places You've Been! User Reactions to Longitudinal Transparency About Third-Party Web Tracking and Inferencing · CCS 2019
Usable security › privacy control
privacy tools
0.112019
Oh, the Places You've Been! User Reactions to Longitudinal Transparency About Third-Party Web Tracking and Inferencing · CCS 2019
Privacy and data protection
online targeting
0.112018
Unpacking Perceptions of Data-Driven Inferences Underlying Online Targeting and Personalization · CHI 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

iterative evaluation · 1.0function composition · 1.0conditional evaluation · 1.0survey experiment · 0.7online study · 0.7topic modeling · 0.4longitudinal field study · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 DIY assistant: a multi-modal end-user programmable virtual assistant
abstract
While Alexa can perform over 100,000 skills, its capability covers only a fraction of what is possible on the web. Individuals need and want to automate a long tail of web-based tasks which often involve visiting different websites and require programming concepts such as function composition, conditional, and iterative evaluation. This paper presents DIYA (Do-It-Yourself Assistant), a new system that empowers users to create personalized web-based virtual assistant skills that require the full generality of composable control constructs, without having to learn a formal programming language.
Michael Fischer 0010, Giovanni Campagna, Euirim Choi, Monica S. Lam
PLDI3
2019 Oh, the Places You've Been! User Reactions to Longitudinal Transparency About Third-Party Web Tracking and Inferencing
abstract
Internet companies track users' online activity to make inferences about their interests, which are then used to target ads and personalize their web experience. Prior work has shown that existing privacy-protective tools give users only a limited understanding and incomplete picture of online tracking. We present Tracking Transparency, a privacy-preserving browser extension that visualizes examples of long-term, longitudinal information that third-party trackers could have inferred from users' browsing. The extension uses a client-side topic modeling algorithm to categorize pages that users visit and combines this with data about the web trackers encountered over time to create these visualizations. We conduct a longitudinal field study in which 425 participants use one of six variants of our extension for a week. We find that, after using the extension, participants have more accurate perceptions of the extent of tracking and also intend to take privacy-protecting actions.
Ben Weinshel, Miranda Wei, Mainack Mondal, Euirim Choi, Shawn Shan, Claire Dolin, Michelle L. Mazurek, Blase Ur
CCS4
2018 Unpacking Perceptions of Data-Driven Inferences Underlying Online Targeting and Personalization
abstract
Much of what a user sees browsing the internet, from ads to search results, is targeted or personalized by algorithms that have made inferences about that user. Prior work has documented that users find such targeting simultaneously useful and creepy. We begin unpacking these conflicted feelings through two online studies. In the first study, 306 participants saw one of ten explanations for why they received an ad, reflecting prevalent methods of targeting based on demographics, interests, and other factors. The type of interest-based targeting described in the explanation affected participants' comfort with the targeting and perceptions of its usefulness. We conducted a follow-up study in which 237 participants saw ten interests companies might infer. Both the sensitivity of the interest category and participants' actual interest in that topic significantly impacted their attitudes toward inferencing. Our results inform the design of transparency tools.
Claire Dolin, Ben Weinshel, Shawn Shan, Chang Min Hahn, Euirim Choi, Michelle L. Mazurek, Blase Ur
CHI5