Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Gabriella Hann

dblp:217/9527 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
User interface design and tools · 40% Personal fabrication and tangible interfaces · 35% Accessibility and assistive technology · 19%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Accessibility and assistive technology
assistive technology design
0.412019
"Occupational Therapy is Making": Clinical Rapid Prototyping and Digital Fabrication · CHI 2019
Personal fabrication and tangible interfaces
digital fabrication
0.412019
"Occupational Therapy is Making": Clinical Rapid Prototyping and Digital Fabrication · CHI 2019
User interface design and tools › prototyping
rapid prototyping
0.412019
"Occupational Therapy is Making": Clinical Rapid Prototyping and Digital Fabrication · CHI 2019
Personal fabrication and tangible interfaces › computational design tools
3d modeling
0.312018
Greater than the Sum of its PARTs: Expressing and Reusing Design Intent in 3D Models · CHI 2018
User interface design and tools
end-user programming
0.312018
Greater than the Sum of its PARTs: Expressing and Reusing Design Intent in 3D Models · CHI 2018
Design research and methods
participatory design
0.112019
"Occupational Therapy is Making": Clinical Rapid Prototyping and Digital Fabrication · CHI 2019
User interface design and tools
design tools
0.112018
Greater than the Sum of its PARTs: Expressing and Reusing Design Intent in 3D Models · CHI 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

observation · 0.4co-design · 0.4scripting API · 0.3end-user programming · 0.3GUI · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 "Occupational Therapy is Making": Clinical Rapid Prototyping and Digital Fabrication
abstract
Consumer-fabrication technologies potentially improve the effectiveness and adoption of assistive technology (AT) by engaging AT users in AT creation. However, little is known about the role of clinicians in this revolution. We investigate clinical AT fabrication by working as expert fabricators for clinicians over a four-month period. We observed and co-designed AT with four occupational therapists at two clinics: a free clinic for uninsured clients, and a Veteran's Affairs Hospital. We find that existing fabrication processes, particularly with respect to rapid prototyping, do not align with clinical practice and itsdo-no-harm ethos. We recommend software solutions that would integrate into client care by: amplifying clinicians' expertise, revealing appropriate fabrication opportunities, and supporting adaptable fabrication.
Megan Hofmann, Kristin Williams, Toni Kaplan, Stephanie Valencia, Gabriella Hann, Scott E. Hudson, Jennifer Mankoff, Patrick Carrington
CHI5
2018 Greater than the Sum of its PARTs: Expressing and Reusing Design Intent in 3D Models
abstract
With the increasing popularity of consumer-grade 3D printing, many people are creating, and even more using, objects shared on sites such as Thingiverse. However, our formative study of 962 Thingiverse models shows a lack of re-use of models, perhaps due to the advanced skills needed for 3D modeling. An end user program perspective on 3D modeling is needed. Our framework (PARTs) empowers amateur modelers to graphically specify design intent through geometry. PARTs includes a GUI, scripting API and exemplar library of assertions which test design expectations and integrators which act on intent to create geometry. PARTs lets modelers integrate advanced, model specific functionality into designs, so that they can be re-used and extended, without programming. In two workshops, we show that PARTs helps to create 3D printable models, and modify existing models more easily than with a standard tool.
Megan Hofmann, Gabriella Hann, Scott E. Hudson, Jennifer Mankoff
CHI2