The scientific process is inherently creative, requiring the generation and exploration of ideas for scientific inspiration, projects, study design, and communication. As large language models (LLMs) advance rapidly, scientists increasingly take advantage of their abilities. While LLMs show great promise in supporting many steps of the scientific process, researchers still face significant challenges in validating and steering their output. Interactions tailored to scientists and their specific tasks may empower them to harness the full creative potential of LLMs. I present a course of research that will lead to the development and evaluation of mixed-initiative methods for co-creation in scientific research. These methods aim to facilitate verification and control of AI output. I briefly describe my prior and proposed work on mixed-initiative methods for co-creating research inspiration, studies, and communication, and I detail my current project on an LLM-powered tool for co-creating research project ideas.

Isolated silos of scientific research and the growing challenge of information overload limit awareness across the literature and hinder innovation. Algorithmic curation and recommendation, which often prioritize relevance, can further reinforce these informational “filter bubbles.” In response, we describe Bridger, a system for facilitating discovery of scholars and their work. We construct a faceted representation of authors with information gleaned from their papers and inferred author personas, and use it to develop an approach that locates commonalities and contrasts between scientists to balance relevance and novelty. In studies with computer science researchers, this approach helps users discover authors considered useful for generating novel research directions. We also demonstrate an approach for displaying information about authors, boosting the ability to understand the work of new, unfamiliar scholars. Our analysis reveals that Bridger connects authors who have different citation profiles and publish in different venues, raising the prospect of bridging diverse scientific communities.

Natural language programming is a promising approach to enable end users to instruct new tasks for intelligent agents. However, our formative study found that end users would often use unclear, ambiguous or vague concepts when naturally instructing tasks in natural language, especially when specifying conditionals. Existing systems have limited support for letting the user teach agents new concepts or explaining unclear concepts. In this paper, we describe a new multi-modal domain-independent approach that combines natural language programming and programming-by-demonstration to allow users to first naturally describe tasks and associated conditions at a high level, and then collaborate with the agent to recursively resolve any ambiguities or vagueness through conversations and demonstrations. Users can also define new procedures and concepts by demonstrating and referring to contents within GUIs of existing mobile apps. We demonstrate this approach in PUMICE, an end-user programmable agent that implements this approach. A lab study with 10 users showed its usability.

Literate programming tools are used by millions of programmers today, and are intended to facilitate presenting data analyses in the form of a narrative. We interviewed 21 data scientists to study coding behaviors in a literate programming environment and how data scientists kept track of variants they explored. For participants who tried to keep a detailed history of their experimentation, both informal and formal versioning attempts led to problems, such as reduced notebook readability. During iteration, participants actively curated their notebooks into narratives, although primarily through cell structure rather than markdown explanations. Next, we surveyed 45 data scientists and asked them to envision how they might use their past history in an future version control system. Based on these results, we give design guidance for future literate programming tools, such as providing history search based on how programmers recall their explorations, through contextual details including images and parameters.

Though conditionals are an integral component of programming, providing an easy means of creating conditionals remains a challenge for programming-by-demonstration (PBD) systems for task automation. We hypothesize that a promising method for implementing conditionals in such systems is to incorporate the use of verbal instructions. Verbal instructions supplied concurrently with demonstrations have been shown to improve the generalizability of PBD. However, the challenge of supporting conditional creation using this multi-modal approach has not been addressed. In this extended abstract, we present our study on understanding how end users describe conditionals in natural language for mobile app tasks. We conducted a formative study of 56 participants asking them to verbally describe conditionals in different settings for 9 sample tasks and to invent conditional tasks. Participant responses were analyzed using open coding and revealed that, in the context of mobile apps, end users often omit desired else statements when explaining conditionals, sometimes use ambiguous concepts in expressing conditionals, and often desire to implement complex conditionals. Based on these findings, we discuss the implications for designing a multimodal PBD interface to support the creation of conditionals.