Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Martino Mensio

dblp:218/0707 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-9875-6396ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 30% Information extraction and text analysis · 30% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 30%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
explainable AI
0.512021
Weaving a Semantic Web of Credibility Reviews for Explainable Misinformation Detection (Extended Abstract) · IJCAI 2021
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
misinformation detection
0.512021
Weaving a Semantic Web of Credibility Reviews for Explainable Misinformation Detection (Extended Abstract) · IJCAI 2021
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › ontology
semantic web
0.512021
Weaving a Semantic Web of Credibility Reviews for Explainable Misinformation Detection (Extended Abstract) · IJCAI 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

semantic web technologies · 0.5deep learning · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 CimpleKG: A Continuously Updated Knowledge Graph on Misinformation, Factors and Fact-Checks
abstract
Misinformation has a pervasive thread running through society, causing confusion, mistrust, and uncertainty. The detection, tracking, and countering of misinformation is a very active research area with an intense need for data about circulating claims and their attributes, fact-checks, and verification outcomes. Although various relevant datasets exist, they tend to be of limited scope in terms of time coverage, topics, country, language, and quantity. In this paper, we introduce CimpleKG as an open and continuously updated semantic resource. CimpleKG links daily updated data from 77 fact-checking organisations with over 217k documents from static misinformation datasets. The knowledge graph is also augmented with relevant textual features and entities extracted from the textual data integrated into the graph. At the time of writing, the knowledge graph contains more than 15m triples, including 263k+ distinct entities and 1m textual features with over 203k fact-checked claims, spanning 26 languages and 36 countries. CimpleKG is publicly available and has been used in various research studies and web applications. Resource Type: Knowledge Graph. License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0. SPARQL Endpoint: https://purl.org/net/cimplekg/sparql . KG Releases: https://purl.org/net/cimplekg/knowledge-graph . KG Explorer: https://purl.org/net/cimplekg/explorer .
Grégoire Burel, Martino Mensio, Youri Peskine, Raphaël Troncy, Paolo Papotti, Harith Alani
ISWC (3)2
2021 Weaving a Semantic Web of Credibility Reviews for Explainable Misinformation Detection (Extended Abstract)
abstract
This paper summarises work where we combined semantic web technologies with deep learning systems to obtain state-of-the art explainable misinformation detection. We proposed a conceptual and computational model to describe a wide range of misinformation detection systems based around the concepts of credibility and reviews. We described how Credibility Reviews (CRs) can be used to build networks of distributed bots that collaborate for misinformation detection which we evaluated by building a prototype based on publicly available datasets and deep learning models.
Ronald Denaux, Martino Mensio, José Manuél Gómez-Pérez, Harith Alani
IJCAI2