Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lior Fox

dblp:218/5200 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Reinforcement learning · 72% Machine translation · 28%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
neural machine translation
0.412020
On the Weaknesses of Reinforcement Learning for Neural Machine Translation · ICLR 2020
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
action selection
0.312018
DORA The Explorer: Directed Outreaching Reinforcement Action-Selection · ICLR (Poster) 2018
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
exploration
0.312018
DORA The Explorer: Directed Outreaching Reinforcement Action-Selection · ICLR (Poster) 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reinforcement learning · 0.8policy gradient · 0.4action selection · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Reinforcement Learning with Large Action Spaces for Neural Machine Translation
abstract
Applying Reinforcement learning (RL) following maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) pre-training is a versatile method for enhancing neural machine translation (NMT) performance. However, recent work has argued that the gains produced by RL for NMT are mostly due to promoting tokens that have already received a fairly high probability in pre-training. We hypothesize that the large action space is a main obstacle to RL’s effectiveness in MT, and conduct two sets of experiments that lend support to our hypothesis. First, we find that reducing the size of the vocabulary improves RL’s effectiveness. Second, we find that effectively reducing the dimension of the action space without changing the vocabulary also yields notable improvement as evaluated by BLEU, semantic similarity, and human evaluation. Indeed, by initializing the network’s final fully connected layer (that maps the network’s internal dimension to the vocabulary dimension), with a layer that generalizes over similar actions, we obtain a substantial improvement in RL performance: 1.5 BLEU points on average.
Asaf Yehudai, Leshem Choshen, Lior Fox, Omri Abend
COLING3
2020 On the Weaknesses of Reinforcement Learning for Neural Machine Translation
Leshem Choshen, Lior Fox, Zohar Aizenbud, Omri Abend
ICLR2
2018 DORA The Explorer: Directed Outreaching Reinforcement Action-Selection
Lior Fox, Leshem Choshen, Yonatan Loewenstein
ICLR (Poster)1