Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Dazhi Cheng
dblp:218/5288
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Deep learning architectures and training · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
attention mechanism |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | An Empirical Study of Spatial Attention Mechanisms in Deep Networks · ICCV 2019 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › attention mechanism
attention module |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | An Empirical Study of Spatial Attention Mechanisms in Deep Networks · ICCV 2019 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
neural network module design |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | An Empirical Study of Spatial Attention Mechanisms in Deep Networks · ICCV 2019 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › attention mechanism › visual attention
spatial attention |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | An Empirical Study of Spatial Attention Mechanisms in Deep Networks · ICCV 2019 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › transformer
vision transformer |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | An Empirical Study of Spatial Attention Mechanisms in Deep Networks · ICCV 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
dynamic convolution · 0.4deformable convolution · 0.4ablation study · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | An Empirical Study of Spatial Attention Mechanisms in Deep NetworksabstractAttention mechanisms have become a popular component in deep neural networks, yet there has been little examination of how different influencing factors and methods for computing attention from these factors affect performance. Toward a better general understanding of attention mechanisms, we present an empirical study that ablates various spatial attention elements within a generalized attention formulation, encompassing the dominant Transformer attention as well as the prevalent deformable convolution and dynamic convolution modules. Conducted on a variety of applications, the study yields significant findings about spatial attention in deep networks, some of which run counter to conventional understanding. For example, we find that the query and key content comparison in Transformer attention is negligible for self-attention, but vital for encoder-decoder attention. A proper combination of deformable convolution with key content only saliency achieves the best accuracy-efficiency tradeoff in self-attention. Our results suggest that there exists much room for improvement in the design of attention mechanisms. Xizhou Zhu, Dazhi Cheng, Zheng Zhang 0022, Stephen Lin 0001, Jifeng Dai |
ICCV | 2 |