Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Saurabh Varshneya

dblp:218/5370 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 76% Vision and language · 18% Time series and sequential data · 7%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
2.332026
Reimagining Anomalies: What If Anomalies Were Normal? · AAAI 2026
Interpretable Tensor Fusion · IJCAI 2024
Learning Interpretable Concept Groups in CNNs · IJCAI 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › explainable AI
anomaly explanation
1.012026
Reimagining Anomalies: What If Anomalies Were Normal? · AAAI 2026
Computer vision › Vision and language › multimodal fusion
tensor fusion
0.812024
Interpretable Tensor Fusion · IJCAI 2024
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › anomaly detection
visual anomaly detection
0.312026
Reimagining Anomalies: What If Anomalies Were Normal? · AAAI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

deep anomaly detection · 1.0counterfactual generation · 1.0regularization · 0.5concept group learning · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Reimagining Anomalies: What If Anomalies Were Normal?
abstract
Deep learning-based methods have achieved a breakthrough in image anomaly detection, but their complexity introduces a considerable challenge to understanding why an instance is predicted to be anomalous. We introduce a novel explanation method that generates multiple alternative modifications for each anomaly, capturing diverse concepts of anomalousness. Each modification is trained to be perceived as normal by the anomaly detector. The method provides a semantic explanation of the mechanism that triggered the detector, allowing users to explore ``what-if scenarios.'' Qualitative and quantitative analyses across various image datasets demonstrate that applying this method to state-of-the-art detectors provides high-quality semantic explanations.
Philipp Liznerski, Saurabh Varshneya, Ece Calikus, Puyu Wang, Alexander Bartscher, Sebastian J. Vollmer, Sophie Fellenz, Marius Kloft
AAAI2
2024 Interpretable Tensor Fusion
Saurabh Varshneya, Antoine Ledent, Philipp Liznerski, Andriy Balinskyy, Purvanshi Mehta, Waleed Mustafa, Marius Kloft
IJCAI1
2021 Learning Interpretable Concept Groups in CNNs
abstract
We propose a novel training methodology---Concept Group Learning (CGL)---that encourages training of interpretable CNN filters by partitioning filters in each layer into \emph{concept groups}, each of which is trained to learn a single visual concept. We achieve this through a novel regularization strategy that forces filters in the same group to be active in similar image regions for a given layer. We additionally use a regularizer to encourage a sparse weighting of the concept groups in each layer so that a few concept groups can have greater importance than others. We quantitatively evaluate CGL's model interpretability using standard interpretability evaluation techniques and find that our method increases interpretability scores in most cases. Qualitatively we compare the image regions which are most active under filters learned using CGL versus filters learned without CGL and find that CGL activation regions more strongly concentrate around semantically relevant features.
Saurabh Varshneya, Antoine Ledent, Robert A. Vandermeulen, Yunwen Lei, Matthias Enders, Damian Borth, Marius Kloft
IJCAI1
2018 Recognizing Challenging Handwritten Annotations with Fully Convolutional Networks
abstract
This paper introduces a very challenging dataset of historic German documents and evaluates Fully Convolutional Neural Network (FCNN) based methods to locate handwritten annotations of any kind in these documents. The handwritten annotations can appear in form of underlines and text by using various writing instruments, e.g., the use of pencils makes the data more challenging. We train and evaluate various end-to-end semantic segmentation approaches and report the results. The task is to classify the pixels of documents into two classes: background and handwritten annotation. The best model achieves a mean Intersection over Union (IOU) score of 95.6% on the test documents of the presented dataset. We also present a comparison of different strategies used for data augmentation and training on our presented dataset. For evaluation, we use the Layout Analysis Evaluator for the ICDAR 2017 Competition on Layout Analysis for Challenging Medieval Manuscripts.
Andreas Kölsch, Saurabh Varshneya, Muhammad Zeshan Afzal, Marcus Liwicki
ICFHR3