Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Andreas Koukorinis
dblp:218/5515
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 50% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 50% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
causal inference |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Structured Learning of Compositional Sequential Interventions · NeurIPS 2024 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › model representation
compositional model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Structured Learning of Compositional Sequential Interventions · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
compositional model · 0.8causal matrix factorization · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Structured Learning of Compositional Sequential InterventionsabstractWe consider sequential treatment regimes where each unit is exposed to combinations of interventions over time. When interventions are described by qualitative labels, such as "close schools for a month due to a pandemic" or "promote this podcast to this user during this week", it is unclear which appropriate structural assumptions allow us to generalize behavioral predictions to previously unseen combinations of interventions. Standard black-box approaches mapping sequences of categorical variables to outputs are applicable, but they rely on poorly understood assumptions on how reliable generalization can be obtained, and may underperform under sparse sequences, temporal variability, and large action spaces. To approach that, we pose an explicit model for composition, that is, how the effect of sequential interventions can be isolated into modules, clarifying which data conditions allow for the identification of their combined effect at different units and time steps. We show the identification properties of our compositional model, inspired by advances in causal matrix factorization methods. Our focus is on predictive models for novel compositions of interventions instead of matrix completion tasks and causal effect estimation. We compare our approach to flexible but generic black-box models to illustrate how structure aids prediction in sparse data conditions. Jialin Yu 0001, Andreas Koukorinis, Nicolò Colombo, Ricardo Silva 0001 |
NeurIPS | 2 |