Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Steven Gardner

dblp:218/6314 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Optimization for machine learning · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Parallel and multicore computing · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
hyperparameter optimization
0.312018
Autotune: A Derivative-free Optimization Framework for Hyperparameter Tuning · KDD 2018
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › black-box optimization
zeroth-order optimization
0.312018
Autotune: A Derivative-free Optimization Framework for Hyperparameter Tuning · KDD 2018
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel computing › parallel machine learning
parallel and distributed training
0.312018
Autotune: A Derivative-free Optimization Framework for Hyperparameter Tuning · KDD 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

search · 0.7sampling · 0.7derivative-free optimization · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Constrained Multi-Objective Optimization for Automated Machine Learning
abstract
Automated machine learning has gained a lot of attention recently. Building and selecting the right machine learning models is often a multi-objective optimization problem. General purpose machine learning software that simultaneously supports multiple objectives and constraints is scant, though the potential benefits are great. In this work, we present a framework called Autotune that effectively handles multiple objectives and constraints that arise in machine learning problems. Autotune is built on a suite of derivative-free optimization methods, and utilizes multi-level parallelism in a distributed computing environment for automatically training, scoring, and selecting good models. Incorporation of multiple objectives and constraints in the model exploration and selection process provides the flexibility needed to satisfy trade-offs necessary in practical machine learning applications. Experimental results from standard multi-objective optimization benchmark problems show that Autotune is very efficient in capturing Pareto fronts. These benchmark results also show how adding constraints can guide the search to more promising regions of the solution space, ultimately producing more desirable Pareto fronts. Results from two real-world case studies demonstrate the effectiveness of the constrained multi-objective optimization capability offered by Autotune.
Steven Gardner, Oleg Golovidov, Joshua Griffin, Patrick Koch, Wayne Thompson, Brett Wujek
DSAA1
2018 Autotune: A Derivative-free Optimization Framework for Hyperparameter Tuning
abstract
Machine learning applications often require hyperparameter tuning. The hyperparameters usually drive both the efficiency of the model training process and the resulting model quality. For hyperparameter tuning, machine learning algorithms are complex black-boxes. This creates a class of challenging optimization problems, whose objective functions tend to be nonsmooth, discontinuous, unpredictably varying in computational expense, and include continuous, categorical, and/or integer variables. Further, function evaluations can fail for a variety of reasons including numerical difficulties or hardware failures. Additionally, not all hyperparameter value combinations are compatible, which creates so called hidden constraints. Robust and efficient optimization algorithms are needed for hyperparameter tuning. In this paper we present an automated parallel derivative-free optimization framework called Autotune , which combines a number of specialized sampling and search methods that are very effective in tuning machine learning models despite these challenges. Autotune provides significantly improved models over using default hyperparameter settings with minimal user interaction on real-world applications. Given the inherent expense of training numerous candidate models, we demonstrate the effectiveness of Autotune's search methods and the efficient distributed and parallel paradigms for training and tuning models, and also discuss the resource trade-offs associated with the ability to both distribute the training process and parallelize the tuning process.
Patrick Koch, Oleg Golovidov, Steven Gardner, Brett Wujek, Joshua Griffin
KDD3