Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Maksym Korablyov
dblp:218/6445
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Generative modeling · 77% Reinforcement learning · 23% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative flow networks |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | Learning GFlowNets From Partial Episodes For Improved Convergence And Stability · ICML 2023 Flow Network based Generative Models for Non-Iterative Diverse Candidate Generation · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
temporal difference learning |
0.8 | 2 | 2023 | Learning GFlowNets From Partial Episodes For Improved Convergence And Stability · ICML 2023 Flow Network based Generative Models for Non-Iterative Diverse Candidate Generation · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
flow matching |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | SE(3)-Stochastic Flow Matching for Protein Backbone Generation · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › flow matching
protein backbone generation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | SE(3)-Stochastic Flow Matching for Protein Backbone Generation · ICLR 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
generative modeling |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | SE(3)-Stochastic Flow Matching for Protein Backbone Generation · ICLR 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein design
protein structure design |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | SE(3)-Stochastic Flow Matching for Protein Backbone Generation · ICLR 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
riemannian optimal transport · 1.5SE(3) flow matching · 1.5stochastic gradient descent · 0.7TD(lambda) · 0.7temporal difference learning · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | SE(3)-Stochastic Flow Matching for Protein Backbone GenerationabstractThe computational design of novel protein structures has the potential to impact numerous scientific disciplines greatly. Toward this goal, we introduce \foldflow, a series of novel generative models of increasing modeling power based on the flow-matching paradigm over $3\mathrm{D}$ rigid motions---i.e. the group $\mathrm{SE(3)}$---enabling accurate modeling of protein backbones. We first introduce $\text{FoldFlow-Base}$, a simulation-free approach to learning deterministic continuous-time dynamics and matching invariant target distributions on $\mathrm{SE(3)}$. We next accelerate training by incorporating Riemannian optimal transport to create $\text{FoldFlow-OT}$, leading to the construction of both more simple and stable flows. Finally, we design \foldflowsfm, coupling both Riemannian OT and simulation-free training to learn stochastic continuous-time dynamics over $\mathrm{SE(3)}$. Our family of $\text{FoldFlow}$, generative models offers several key advantages over previous approaches to the generative modeling of proteins: they are more stable and faster to train than diffusion-based approaches, and our models enjoy the ability to map any invariant source distribution to any invariant target distribution over $\mathrm{SE(3)}$. Empirically, we validate $\text{FoldFlow}$, on protein backbone generation of up to $300$ amino acids leading to high-quality designable, diverse, and novel samples. Joey Bose, Tara Akhound-Sadegh, Guillaume Huguet, Kilian Fatras, Jarrid Rector-Brooks, Cheng-Hao Liu, Andrei Cristian Nica, Maksym Korablyov, Michael M. Bronstein, Alexander Tong 0001 |
ICLR | 8 |
| 2023 | Learning GFlowNets From Partial Episodes For Improved Convergence And StabilityabstractGenerative flow networks (GFlowNets) are a family of algorithms for training a sequential sampler of discrete objects under an unnormalized target density and have been successfully used for various probabilistic modeling tasks. Existing training objectives for GFlowNets are either local to states or transitions, or propagate a reward signal over an entire sampling trajectory. We argue that these alternatives represent opposite ends of a gradient bias-variance tradeoff and propose a way to exploit this tradeoff to mitigate its harmful effects. Inspired by the TD($\lambda$) algorithm in reinforcement learning, we introduce *subtrajectory balance* or SubTB($\lambda$), a GFlowNet training objective that can learn from partial action subsequences of varying lengths. We show that SubTB($\lambda$) accelerates sampler convergence in previously studied and new environments and enables training GFlowNets in environments with longer action sequences and sparser reward landscapes than what was possible before. We also perform a comparative analysis of stochastic gradient dynamics, shedding light on the bias-variance tradeoff in GFlowNet training and the advantages of subtrajectory balance. Kanika Madan, Jarrid Rector-Brooks, Maksym Korablyov, Emmanuel Bengio, Moksh Jain, Andrei Cristian Nica, Tom Bosc, Yoshua Bengio, Nikolay Malkin |
ICML | 3 |
| 2021 | Flow Network based Generative Models for Non-Iterative Diverse Candidate GenerationabstractThis paper is about the problem of learning a stochastic policy for generating an object (like a molecular graph) from a sequence of actions, such that the probability of generating an object is proportional to a given positive reward for that object. Whereas standard return maximization tends to converge to a single return-maximizing sequence, there are cases where we would like to sample a diverse set of high-return solutions. These arise, for example, in black-box function optimization when few rounds are possible, each with large batches of queries, where the batches should be diverse, e.g., in the design of new molecules. One can also see this as a problem of approximately converting an energy function to a generative distribution. While MCMC methods can achieve that, they are expensive and generally only perform local exploration. Instead, training a generative policy amortizes the cost of search during training and yields to fast generation. Using insights from Temporal Difference learning, we propose GFlowNet, based on a view of the generative process as a flow network, making it possible to handle the tricky case where different trajectories can yield the same final state, e.g., there are many ways to sequentially add atoms to generate some molecular graph. We cast the set of trajectories as a flow and convert the flow consistency equations into a learning objective, akin to the casting of the Bellman equations into Temporal Difference methods. We prove that any global minimum of the proposed objectives yields a policy which samples from the desired distribution, and demonstrate the improved performance and diversity of GFlowNet on a simple domain where there are many modes to the reward function, and on a molecule synthesis task. Emmanuel Bengio, Moksh Jain, Maksym Korablyov, Doina Precup, Yoshua Bengio |
NeurIPS | 3 |