Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Peiyuan Liao

dblp:218/6730 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-4387-7940ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Representation and self-supervised learning · 63% Graph learning · 18% Trustworthy machine learning · 18%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 38% Parallel and multicore computing · 38% Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 23%
Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed systems
distributed machine learning
0.912025
GraphPipe: Improving Performance and Scalability of DNN Training with Graph Pipeline Parallelism · ASPLOS (1) 2025
Parallel and multicore computing
pipeline parallelism
0.912025
GraphPipe: Improving Performance and Scalability of DNN Training with Graph Pipeline Parallelism · ASPLOS (1) 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning
0.612022
Learning Weakly-supervised Contrastive Representations · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › contrastive learning
weakly-supervised contrastive learning
0.612022
Learning Weakly-supervised Contrastive Representations · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
weakly supervised representation learning
0.612022
Learning Weakly-supervised Contrastive Representations · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network
0.512021
Information Obfuscation of Graph Neural Networks · ICML 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
privacy and data protection
0.512021
Information Obfuscation of Graph Neural Networks · ICML 2021
Privacy and data protection › privacy-enhancing technologies
information obfuscation
0.512021
Information Obfuscation of Graph Neural Networks · ICML 2021
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures › machine learning accelerator
DNN training
0.312025
GraphPipe: Improving Performance and Scalability of DNN Training with Graph Pipeline Parallelism · ASPLOS (1) 2025
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures
machine learning accelerator
0.312025
GraphPipe: Improving Performance and Scalability of DNN Training with Graph Pipeline Parallelism · ASPLOS (1) 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

wasserstein distance · 1.0total variation distance · 1.0adversarial training · 1.0model partitioning · 0.9graph pipeline parallelism · 0.9weak supervision · 0.6contrastive learning · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 GraphPipe: Improving Performance and Scalability of DNN Training with Graph Pipeline Parallelism
abstract
Deep neural networks (DNNs) continue to grow rapidly in size, making them infeasible to train on a single device (e.g. GPU). Pipeline parallelism is commonly used in existing DNN systems to support large-scale DNN training by partitioning a DNN into multiple stages, which concurrently perform DNN computation for different micro-batches of training samples in a pipeline fashion. However, existing pipeline-parallel approaches only consider sequential pipeline stages and thus ignore the topology of a DNN, resulting in missed model-parallel opportunities.
Byungsoo Jeon, Mengdi Wu, Shiyi Cao, Sunghyun Park 0004, Neeraj Aggarwal, Colin Unger, Daiyaan Arfeen, Peiyuan Liao, Xupeng Miao, Mohammad Alizadeh, Gregory R. Ganger, Tianqi Chen 0001
ASPLOS (1)9
2022 Collage: Seamless Integration of Deep Learning Backends with Automatic Placement
abstract
The strong demand for efficient and performant deployment of Deep Learning (DL) applications prompts the rapid development of a rich DL ecosystem. To keep up with this fast advancement, it is crucial for modern DL frameworks to efficiently integrate a variety of optimized tensor algebra libraries and runtimes as their backends and generate the fastest possible executable using these backends. However, current DL frameworks require significant manual effort and expertise to integrate every new backend while failing to unleash its full potential. Given the fast-evolving nature of the DL ecosystem, this manual approach often slows down continuous innovations across different layers; it prevents hardware vendors from the fast deployment of their cutting-edge libraries, DL framework developers must repeatedly adjust their hand-coded rules to accommodate new versions of libraries, and machine learning practitioners need to wait for the integration of new technologies and often encounter unsatisfactory performance.
Byungsoo Jeon, Sunghyun Park 0004, Peiyuan Liao, Tianqi Chen 0001
PACT3
2022 Learning Weakly-supervised Contrastive Representations
Yao-Hung Tsai, Tianqin Li, Peiyuan Liao, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, Louis-Philippe Morency
ICLR4
2021 Information Obfuscation of Graph Neural Networks
abstract
While the advent of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) has greatly improved node and graph representation learning in many applications, the neighborhood aggregation scheme exposes additional vulnerabilities to adversaries seeking to extract node-level information about sensitive attributes. In this paper, we study the problem of protecting sensitive attributes by information obfuscation when learning with graph structured data. We propose a framework to locally filter out pre-determined sensitive attributes via adversarial training with the total variation and the Wasserstein distance. Our method creates a strong defense against inference attacks, while only suffering small loss in task performance. Theoretically, we analyze the effectiveness of our framework against a worst-case adversary, and characterize an inherent trade-off between maximizing predictive accuracy and minimizing information leakage. Experiments across multiple datasets from recommender systems, knowledge graphs and quantum chemistry demonstrate that the proposed approach provides a robust defense across various graph structures and tasks, while producing competitive GNN encoders for downstream tasks.
Peiyuan Liao, Han Zhao 0002, Keyulu Xu, Tommi S. Jaakkola, Geoffrey J. Gordon, Stefanie Jegelka, Ruslan Salakhutdinov
ICML1