Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Peiyuan Liao
dblp:218/6730
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-4387-7940ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 63% Graph learning · 18% Trustworthy machine learning · 18% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Distributed systems · 38% Parallel and multicore computing · 38% Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 23% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 100% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Distributed systems
distributed machine learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | GraphPipe: Improving Performance and Scalability of DNN Training with Graph Pipeline Parallelism · ASPLOS (1) 2025 |
Parallel and multicore computing
pipeline parallelism |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | GraphPipe: Improving Performance and Scalability of DNN Training with Graph Pipeline Parallelism · ASPLOS (1) 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Learning Weakly-supervised Contrastive Representations · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › contrastive learning
weakly-supervised contrastive learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Learning Weakly-supervised Contrastive Representations · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
weakly supervised representation learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Learning Weakly-supervised Contrastive Representations · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Information Obfuscation of Graph Neural Networks · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
privacy and data protection |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Information Obfuscation of Graph Neural Networks · ICML 2021 |
Privacy and data protection › privacy-enhancing technologies
information obfuscation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Information Obfuscation of Graph Neural Networks · ICML 2021 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures › machine learning accelerator
DNN training |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | GraphPipe: Improving Performance and Scalability of DNN Training with Graph Pipeline Parallelism · ASPLOS (1) 2025 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures
machine learning accelerator |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | GraphPipe: Improving Performance and Scalability of DNN Training with Graph Pipeline Parallelism · ASPLOS (1) 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
wasserstein distance · 1.0total variation distance · 1.0adversarial training · 1.0model partitioning · 0.9graph pipeline parallelism · 0.9weak supervision · 0.6contrastive learning · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | GraphPipe: Improving Performance and Scalability of DNN Training with Graph Pipeline ParallelismabstractDeep neural networks (DNNs) continue to grow rapidly in size, making them infeasible to train on a single device (e.g. GPU). Pipeline parallelism is commonly used in existing DNN systems to support large-scale DNN training by partitioning a DNN into multiple stages, which concurrently perform DNN computation for different micro-batches of training samples in a pipeline fashion. However, existing pipeline-parallel approaches only consider sequential pipeline stages and thus ignore the topology of a DNN, resulting in missed model-parallel opportunities. Byungsoo Jeon, Mengdi Wu, Shiyi Cao, Sunghyun Park 0004, Neeraj Aggarwal, Colin Unger, Daiyaan Arfeen, Peiyuan Liao, Xupeng Miao, Mohammad Alizadeh, Gregory R. Ganger, Tianqi Chen 0001 |
ASPLOS (1) | 9 |
| 2022 | Collage: Seamless Integration of Deep Learning Backends with Automatic PlacementabstractThe strong demand for efficient and performant deployment of Deep Learning (DL) applications prompts the rapid development of a rich DL ecosystem. To keep up with this fast advancement, it is crucial for modern DL frameworks to efficiently integrate a variety of optimized tensor algebra libraries and runtimes as their backends and generate the fastest possible executable using these backends. However, current DL frameworks require significant manual effort and expertise to integrate every new backend while failing to unleash its full potential. Given the fast-evolving nature of the DL ecosystem, this manual approach often slows down continuous innovations across different layers; it prevents hardware vendors from the fast deployment of their cutting-edge libraries, DL framework developers must repeatedly adjust their hand-coded rules to accommodate new versions of libraries, and machine learning practitioners need to wait for the integration of new technologies and often encounter unsatisfactory performance. Byungsoo Jeon, Sunghyun Park 0004, Peiyuan Liao, Tianqi Chen 0001 |
PACT | 3 |
| 2022 | Learning Weakly-supervised Contrastive Representations
Yao-Hung Tsai, Tianqin Li, Peiyuan Liao, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, Louis-Philippe Morency |
ICLR | 4 |
| 2021 | Information Obfuscation of Graph Neural NetworksabstractWhile the advent of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) has greatly improved node and graph representation learning in many applications, the neighborhood aggregation scheme exposes additional vulnerabilities to adversaries seeking to extract node-level information about sensitive attributes. In this paper, we study the problem of protecting sensitive attributes by information obfuscation when learning with graph structured data. We propose a framework to locally filter out pre-determined sensitive attributes via adversarial training with the total variation and the Wasserstein distance. Our method creates a strong defense against inference attacks, while only suffering small loss in task performance. Theoretically, we analyze the effectiveness of our framework against a worst-case adversary, and characterize an inherent trade-off between maximizing predictive accuracy and minimizing information leakage. Experiments across multiple datasets from recommender systems, knowledge graphs and quantum chemistry demonstrate that the proposed approach provides a robust defense across various graph structures and tasks, while producing competitive GNN encoders for downstream tasks. Peiyuan Liao, Han Zhao 0002, Keyulu Xu, Tommi S. Jaakkola, Geoffrey J. Gordon, Stefanie Jegelka, Ruslan Salakhutdinov |
ICML | 1 |