EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Beau Coker
dblp:218/6746
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 50% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 50% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
bayesian nonparametric model |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Towards a Unified Framework for Uncertainty-aware Nonlinear Variable Selection with Theoretical Guarantees · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
feature importance |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Towards a Unified Framework for Uncertainty-aware Nonlinear Variable Selection with Theoretical Guarantees · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Towards a Unified Framework for Uncertainty-aware Nonlinear Variable Selection with Theoretical Guarantees · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › bayesian asymptotics
posterior consistency |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Towards a Unified Framework for Uncertainty-aware Nonlinear Variable Selection with Theoretical Guarantees · NeurIPS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
integrated partial derivative · 0.6bayesian nonparametric theory · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Wide Mean-Field Bayesian Neural Networks Ignore the DataabstractBayesian neural networks (BNNs) combine the expressive power of deep learning with the advantages of Bayesian formalism. In recent years, the analysis of wide, deep BNNs has provided theoretical insight into their priors and posteriors. However, we have no analogous insight into their posteriors under approximate inference. In this work, we show that mean-field variational inference entirely fails to model the data when the network width is large and the activation function is odd. Specifically, for fully-connected BNNs with odd activation functions and a homoscedastic Gaussian likelihood, we show that the optimal mean-field variational posterior predictive (i.e., function space) distribution converges to the prior predictive distribution as the width tends to infinity. We generalize aspects of this result to other likelihoods. Our theoretical results are suggestive of underfitting behavior previously observered in BNNs. While our convergence bounds are non-asymptotic and constants in our analysis can be computed, they are currently too loose to be applicable in standard training regimes. Finally, we show that the optimal approximate posterior need not tend to the prior if the activation function is not odd, showing that our statements cannot be generalized arbitrarily. Beau Coker, Wessel P. Bruinsma, David R. Burt, Finale Doshi-Velez |
AISTATS | 1 |
| 2022 | Towards a Unified Framework for Uncertainty-aware Nonlinear Variable Selection with Theoretical GuaranteesabstractWe develop a simple and unified framework for nonlinear variable importance estimation that incorporates uncertainty in the prediction function and is compatible with a wide range of machine learning models (e.g., tree ensembles, kernel methods, neural networks, etc). In particular, for a learned nonlinear model $f(\mathbf{x})$, we consider quantifying the importance of an input variable $\mathbf{x}^j$ using the integrated partial derivative $\Psi_j = \Vert \frac{\partial}{\partial \mathbf{x}^j} f(\mathbf{x})\Vert^2_{P_\mathcal{X}}$. We then (1) provide a principled approach for quantifying uncertainty in variable importance by deriving its posterior distribution, and (2) show that the approach is generalizable even to non-differentiable models such as tree ensembles. Rigorous Bayesian nonparametric theorems are derived to guarantee the posterior consistency and asymptotic uncertainty of the proposed approach. Extensive simulations and experiments on healthcare benchmark datasets confirm that the proposed algorithm outperforms existing classical and recent variable selection methods. Wenying Deng, Beau Coker, Rajarshi Mukherjee, Jeremiah Z. Liu, Brent A. Coull |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2020 | PoRB-Nets: Poisson Process Radial Basis Function NetworksabstractBayesian neural networks (BNNs) are flexible function priors well-suited to situations in which data are scarce and uncertainty must be quantified. Yet, common weight priors are able to encode little functional knowledge and can behave in undesirable ways. We present a novel prior over radial basis function networks (RBFNs) that allows for independent specification of functional amplitude variance and lengthscale (i.e., smoothness), where the inverse lengthscale corresponds to the concentration of radial basis functions. When the lengthscale is uniform over the input space, we prove consistency and approximate variance stationarity. This is in contrast to common BNN priors, which are highly nonstationary. When the input dependence of the lengthscale is unknown, we show how it can be inferred. We compare this model’s behavior to standard BNNs and Gaussian processes using synthetic and real examples. Beau Coker, Melanie F. Pradier, Finale Doshi-Velez |
UAI | 1 |