Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Philippe Wenk
dblp:218/6763
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 42% Motion planning and robot control · 20% Reinforcement learning · 12% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational science and engineering · 50% Bioinformatics and computational biology · 50% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process |
1.0 | 2 | 2022 | Adaptive Gaussian Process Change Point Detection · ICML 2022 ODIN: ODE-Informed Regression for Parameter and State Inference in Time-Continuous Dynamical Systems · AAAI 2020 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data
change-point detection |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Adaptive Gaussian Process Change Point Detection · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › neural differential equations
neural ordinary differential equations |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Learning Stable Deep Dynamics Models for Partially Observed or Delayed Dynamical Systems · NeurIPS 2021 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › learning control
stable dynamical system learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Learning Stable Deep Dynamics Models for Partially Observed or Delayed Dynamical Systems · NeurIPS 2021 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
system identification |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Learning Stable Deep Dynamics Models for Partially Observed or Delayed Dynamical Systems · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process
constrained gaussian process |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | ODIN: ODE-Informed Regression for Parameter and State Inference in Time-Continuous Dynamical Systems · AAAI 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › model-based reinforcement learning › world model
learned dynamics models |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A Real-Robot Dataset for Assessing Transferability of Learned Dynamics Models · ICRA 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-based reinforcement learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A Real-Robot Dataset for Assessing Transferability of Learned Dynamics Models · ICRA 2020 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A Real-Robot Dataset for Assessing Transferability of Learned Dynamics Models · ICRA 2020 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
adversarial inference |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | AReS and MaRS Adversarial and MMD-Minimizing Regression for SDEs · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › continuous-time model › stochastic differential equations
drift and diffusion estimation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | AReS and MaRS Adversarial and MMD-Minimizing Regression for SDEs · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
moment matching |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | AReS and MaRS Adversarial and MMD-Minimizing Regression for SDEs · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › continuous-time model
stochastic differential equations |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | AReS and MaRS Adversarial and MMD-Minimizing Regression for SDEs · ICML 2019 |
Computational science and engineering › dynamical systems
dynamical systems reconstruction |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | ODIN: ODE-Informed Regression for Parameter and State Inference in Time-Continuous Dynamical Systems · AAAI 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › systems biology
parameter estimation |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | ODIN: ODE-Informed Regression for Parameter and State Inference in Time-Continuous Dynamical Systems · AAAI 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
gaussian process · 1.0generative modeling · 0.9statistical hypothesis testing · 0.6wasserstein loss · 0.5time delay stability analysis · 0.5smoother training · 0.5neural lyapunov function · 0.5neural delay differential equation · 0.5distributional gradient matching · 0.5ordinary differential equations · 0.4ordinary differential equation · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Adaptive Gaussian Process Change Point DetectionabstractDetecting change points in time series, i.e., points in time at which some observed process suddenly changes, is a fundamental task that arises in many real-world applications, with consequences for safety and reliability. In this work, we propose ADAGA, a novel Gaussian process-based solution to this problem, that leverages a powerful heuristics we developed based on statistical hypothesis testing. In contrast to prior approaches, ADAGA adapts to changes both in mean and covariance structure of the temporal process. In extensive experiments, we show its versatility and applicability to different classes of change points, demonstrating that it is significantly more accurate than current state-of-the-art alternatives. Edoardo Caldarelli, Philippe Wenk, Stefan Bauer, Andreas Krause 0001 |
ICML | 2 |
| 2021 | Learning Stable Deep Dynamics Models for Partially Observed or Delayed Dynamical SystemsabstractLearning how complex dynamical systems evolve over time is a key challenge in system identification. For safety critical systems, it is often crucial that the learned model is guaranteed to converge to some equilibrium point. To this end, neural ODEs regularized with neural Lyapunov functions are a promising approach when states are fully observed. For practical applications however, {\em partial observations} are the norm. As we will demonstrate, initialization of unobserved augmented states can become a key problem for neural ODEs. To alleviate this issue, we propose to augment the system's state with its history. Inspired by state augmentation in discrete-time systems, we thus obtain {\em neural delay differential equations}. Based on classical time delay stability analysis, we then show how to ensure stability of the learned models, and theoretically analyze our approach. Our experiments demonstrate its applicability to stable system identification of partially observed systems and learning a stabilizing feedback policy in delayed feedback control. Andreas Schlaginhaufen, Philippe Wenk, Andreas Krause 0001, Florian Dörfler |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2021 | Distributional Gradient Matching for Learning Uncertain Neural Dynamics ModelsabstractDifferential equations in general and neural ODEs in particular are an essential technique in continuous-time system identification. While many deterministic learning algorithms have been designed based on numerical integration via the adjoint method, many downstream tasks such as active learning, exploration in reinforcement learning, robust control, or filtering require accurate estimates of predictive uncertainties. In this work, we propose a novel approach towards estimating epistemically uncertain neural ODEs, avoiding the numerical integration bottleneck. Instead of modeling uncertainty in the ODE parameters, we directly model uncertainties in the state space. Our algorithm distributional gradient matching (DGM) jointly trains a smoother and a dynamics model and matches their gradients via minimizing a Wasserstein loss. Our experiments show that, compared to traditional approximate inference methods based on numerical integration, our approach is faster to train, faster at predicting previously unseen trajectories, and in the context of neural ODEs, significantly more accurate. Lenart Treven, Philippe Wenk, Florian Dörfler, Andreas Krause 0001 |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2020 | ODIN: ODE-Informed Regression for Parameter and State Inference in Time-Continuous Dynamical SystemsabstractParameter inference in ordinary differential equations is an important problem in many applied sciences and in engineering, especially in a data-scarce setting. In this work, we introduce a novel generative modeling approach based on constrained Gaussian processes and leverage it to build a computationally and data efficient algorithm for state and parameter inference. In an extensive set of experiments, our approach outperforms the current state of the art for parameter inference both in terms of accuracy and computational cost. It also shows promising results for the much more challenging problem of model selection. Philippe Wenk, Gabriele Abbati, Michael A. Osborne, Bernhard Schölkopf, Andreas Krause 0001, Stefan Bauer |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2020 | A Real-Robot Dataset for Assessing Transferability of Learned Dynamics ModelsabstractIn the context of model-based reinforcement learning and control, a large number of methods for learning system dynamics have been proposed in recent years. The purpose of these learned models is to synthesize new control policies. An important open question is how robust current dynamics-learning methods are to shifts in the data distribution due to changes in the control policy. We present a real-robot dataset which allows to systematically investigate this question. This dataset contains trajectories of a 3 degrees-of-freedom (DOF) robot being controlled by a diverse set of policies. For comparison, we also provide a simulated version of the dataset. Finally, we benchmark a few widely-used dynamics-learning methods using the proposed dataset. Our results show that the iid test error of a learned model is not necessarily a good indicator of its accuracy under control policies different from the one which generated the training data. This suggests that it may be important to evaluate dynamics-learning methods in terms of their transfer performance, rather than only their iid error. Diego Agudelo-España, Andrii Zadaianchuk, Philippe Wenk, Aditya Garg, Joel Akpo, Felix Grimminger, Julian Viereck, Maximilien Naveau, Ludovic Righetti, Georg Martius, Andreas Krause 0001, Bernhard Schölkopf, Stefan Bauer, Manuel Wüthrich |
ICRA | 3 |
| 2019 | Fast Gaussian process based gradient matching for parameter identification in systems of nonlinear ODEsabstractParameter identification and comparison of dynamical systems is a challenging task in many fields. Bayesian approaches based on Gaussian process regression over time-series data have been successfully applied to infer the parameters of a dynamical system without explicitly solving it. While the benefits in computational cost are well established, the theoretical foundation has been criticized in the past. We offer a novel interpretation which leads to a better understanding, improvements in state-of-the-art performance in terms of accuracy and robustness and a decrease in run time due to a more efficient setup for general nonlinear dynamical systems. Philippe Wenk, Alkis Gotovos, Stefan Bauer, Nico S. Gorbach, Andreas Krause 0001, Joachim M. Buhmann |
AISTATS | 1 |
| 2019 | AReS and MaRS Adversarial and MMD-Minimizing Regression for SDEsabstractStochastic differential equations are an important modeling class in many disciplines. Consequently, there exist many methods relying on various discretization and numerical integration schemes. In this paper, we propose a novel, probabilistic model for estimating the drift and diffusion given noisy observations of the underlying stochastic system. Using state-of-the-art adversarial and moment matching inference techniques, we avoid the discretization schemes of classical approaches. This leads to significant improvements in parameter accuracy and robustness given random initial guesses. On four established benchmark systems, we compare the performance of our algorithms to state-of-the-art solutions based on extended Kalman filtering and Gaussian processes. Gabriele Abbati, Philippe Wenk, Michael A. Osborne, Andreas Krause 0001, Bernhard Schölkopf, Stefan Bauer |
ICML | 2 |