Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hélène Plisnier

dblp:218/7149 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Reinforcement learning · 61% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 39%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
hierarchical reinforcement learning
0.312018
Reinforcement Learning in POMDPs With Memoryless Options and Option-Observation Initiation Sets · AAAI 2018
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › hierarchical reinforcement learning
options framework
0.312018
Reinforcement Learning in POMDPs With Memoryless Options and Option-Observation Initiation Sets · AAAI 2018
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty
partially observable markov decision process
0.312018
Reinforcement Learning in POMDPs With Memoryless Options and Option-Observation Initiation Sets · AAAI 2018
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty
finite-state controllers
0.112018
Reinforcement Learning in POMDPs With Memoryless Options and Option-Observation Initiation Sets · AAAI 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sample-efficient learning · 0.3option-observation initiation sets · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Sample-Efficient Model-Free Reinforcement Learning with Off-Policy Critics
Denis Steckelmacher, Hélène Plisnier, Diederik M. Roijers, Ann Nowé
ECML/PKDD (3)2
2018 Reinforcement Learning in POMDPs With Memoryless Options and Option-Observation Initiation Sets
abstract
Many real-world reinforcement learning problems have a hierarchical nature, and often exhibit some degree of partial observability. While hierarchy and partial observability are usually tackled separately (for instance by combining recurrent neural networks and options), we show that addressing both problems simultaneously is simpler and more efficient in many cases. More specifically, we make the initiation set of options conditional on the previously-executed option, and show that options with such Option-Observation Initiation Sets (OOIs) are at least as expressive as Finite State Controllers (FSCs), a state-of-the-art approach for learning in POMDPs. OOIs are easy to design based on an intuitive description of the task, lead to explainable policies and keep the top-level and option policies memoryless. Our experiments show that OOIs allow agents to learn optimal policies in challenging POMDPs, while being much more sample-efficient than a recurrent neural network over options.
Denis Steckelmacher, Diederik M. Roijers, Anna Harutyunyan, Peter Vrancx, Hélène Plisnier, Ann Nowé
AAAI5