Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Madeline Usher

dblp:218/7200 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 62% Image recognition and object detection · 38%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Learning and educational technologies · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
analogical reasoning
1.022023
Sketch Recognition via Part-based Hierarchical Analogical Learning · IJCAI 2023
Sketch Worksheets in STEM Classrooms: Two Deployments · AAAI 2018
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object recognition › shape-based object recognition
sketch recognition
0.712023
Sketch Recognition via Part-based Hierarchical Analogical Learning · IJCAI 2023
Learning and educational technologies › multimedia learning
sketch-based learning
0.312018
Sketch Worksheets in STEM Classrooms: Two Deployments · AAAI 2018
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
ontology
0.112018
Sketch Worksheets in STEM Classrooms: Two Deployments · AAAI 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

structure-mapping engine · 0.7qualitative representation · 0.7cogsketch · 0.7analogical generalization · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Sketch Recognition via Part-based Hierarchical Analogical Learning
abstract
Sketch recognition has been studied for decades, but it is far from solved. Drawing styles are highly variable across people and adapting to idiosyncratic visual expressions requires data-efficient learning. Explainability also matters, so that users can see why a system got confused about something. This paper introduces a novel part-based approach for sketch recognition, based on hierarchical analogical learning, a new method to apply analogical learning to qualitative representations. Given a sketched object, our system automatically segments it into parts and constructs multi-level qualitative representations of them. Our approach performs analogical generalization at multiple levels of part descriptions and uses coarse-grained results to guide interpretation at finer levels. Experiments on the Berlin TU dataset and the Coloring Book Objects dataset show that the system can learn explainable models in a data-efficient manner.
Kezhen Chen, Kenneth D. Forbus, Balaji Vasan Srinivasan, Niyati Chhaya, Madeline Usher
IJCAI5
2018 Sketch Worksheets in STEM Classrooms: Two Deployments
abstract
Sketching can be a valuable tool for science education, but it is currently underutilized. Sketch worksheets were developed to help change this, by using AI technology to give students immediate feedback and to give instructors assistance in grading. Sketch worksheets use visual representations automatically computed by CogSketch, which are combined with conceptual information from the OpenCyc ontology. Feedback is provided to students by comparing an instructor’s sketch to a student’s sketch, using the Structure-Mapping Engine. This paper describes our experiences in deploying sketch worksheets in two types of classes: Geoscience and AI. Sketch worksheets for introductory geoscience classes were developed by geoscientists at University of Wisconsin-Madison, authored using CogSketch and used in classes at both Wisconsin and Northwestern University. Sketch worksheets were also developed and deployed for a knowledge representation and reasoning course at Northwestern. Our experience indicates that sketch worksheets can provide helpful on-the-spot feedback to students, and significantly improve grading efficiency, to the point where sketching assignments can be more practical to use broadly in STEM education.
Kenneth D. Forbus, Bridget Garnier, Basil Tikoff, Wayne Marko, Madeline Usher, Matthew D. McLure
AAAI5