Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ryo Ishida
dblp:218/7242
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Language models and text generation · 60% Question answering and dialogue systems · 30% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 5% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization
abstractive summarization |
0.7 | 2 | 2019 | Exploiting Background Knowledge in Compact Answer Generation for Why-Questions · AAAI 2019 Semi-Distantly Supervised Neural Model for Generating Compact Answers to Open-Domain Why Questions · AAAI 2018 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text summarization |
0.7 | 2 | 2019 | Exploiting Background Knowledge in Compact Answer Generation for Why-Questions · AAAI 2019 Semi-Distantly Supervised Neural Model for Generating Compact Answers to Open-Domain Why Questions · AAAI 2018 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › reasoning-based question answering
why-question answering |
0.7 | 2 | 2019 | Exploiting Background Knowledge in Compact Answer Generation for Why-Questions · AAAI 2019 Semi-Distantly Supervised Neural Model for Generating Compact Answers to Open-Domain Why Questions · AAAI 2018 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
causal reasoning |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Exploiting Background Knowledge in Compact Answer Generation for Why-Questions · AAAI 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › relation extraction › event relation extraction
causal relation extraction |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Exploiting Background Knowledge in Compact Answer Generation for Why-Questions · AAAI 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
recurrent neural network · 0.4encoder-decoder · 0.4convolutional neural network · 0.4neural network · 0.3distant supervision · 0.3causality recognition · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | A 65nm CMOS Process Li-ion Battery Charging Cascode SIDO Boost Converter with 89% Maximum Efficiency for RF Wireless Power Transfer ReceiverabstractThis paper proposes a 65nm CMOS process cascode single-inductor-dual-output (SIDO) boost converter for RF wireless power transfer (WPT) receiver. In order to withstand 4.2V Li-ion battery output, cascode 2.5V I/O PFETs are used at the power stage while 2.5V cascode NFETs are used for 1V output to supply low voltage control circuit. By using NFETs, 1V output with 5V tolerance can be achieved. Measurement results show conversion efficiency of 89% at PIN=7.9mW and Vbat=3.4V. Yasuaki Isshiki, Dai Suzuki, Ryo Ishida, Kousuke Miyaji |
ASP-DAC | 3 |
| 2019 | Exploiting Background Knowledge in Compact Answer Generation for Why-QuestionsabstractThis paper proposes a novel method for generating compact answers to open-domain why-questions, such as the following answer, “Because deep learning technologies were introduced,” to the question, “Why did Google’s machine translation service improve so drastically?” Although many works have dealt with why-question answering, most have focused on retrieving as answers relatively long text passages that consist of several sentences. Because of their length, such passages are not appropriate to be read aloud by spoken dialog systems and smart speakers; hence, we need to create a method that generates compact answers. We developed a novel neural summarizer for this compact answer generation task. It combines a recurrent neural network-based encoderdecoder model with stacked convolutional neural networks and was designed to effectively exploit background knowledge, in this case a set of causal relations (e.g., “[Microsoft’s machine translation has made great progress over the last few years]effect since [it started to use deep learning.]cause”) that was extracted from a large web data archive (4 billion web pages). Our experimental results show that our method achieved significantly better ROUGE F-scores than existing encoder-decoder models and their variations that were augmented with query-attention and memory networks, which are used to exploit the background knowledge. Ryu Iida, Canasai Kruengkrai, Ryo Ishida, Kentaro Torisawa, Jong-Hoon Oh, Julien Kloetzer |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2018 | Semi-Distantly Supervised Neural Model for Generating Compact Answers to Open-Domain Why QuestionsabstractThis paper proposes a neural network-based method for generating compact answers to open-domain why-questions (e.g., "Why was Mr. Trump elected as the president of the US?"). Unlike factoid question answering methods that provide short text spans as answers, existing work for why-question answering have aimed at answering questions by retrieving relatively long text passages, each of which often consists of several sentences, from a text archive. While the actual answer to a why-question may be expressed over several consecutive sentences, these often contain redundant and/or unrelated parts. Such answers would not be suitable for spoken dialog systems and smart speakers such as Amazon Echo, which receive much attention in these days. In this work, we aim at generating non-redundant compact answers to why-questions from answer passages retrieved from a very large web data corpora (4 billion web pages) by an already existing open-domain why-question answering system, using a novel neural network obtained by extending existing summarization methods. We also automatically generate training data using a large number of causal relations automatically extracted from 4 billion web pages by an existing supervised causality recognizer. The data is used to train our neural network, together with manually created training data. Through a series of experiments, we show that both our novel neural network and auto-generated training data improve the quality of the generated answers both in ROUGE score and in a subjective evaluation. Ryo Ishida, Kentaro Torisawa, Jong-Hoon Oh, Ryu Iida, Canasai Kruengkrai, Julien Kloetzer |
AAAI | 1 |