EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sárka Stejskalová
dblp:218/9788
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
1as first author
5since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 6 · 1 first-author · 5 since 2021
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Kurepa trees, continuous images, and perfect set properties
Chris Lambie-Hanson, Sárka Stejskalová |
Ann. Pure Appl. Log. | 2 |
| 2025 | Club stationary reflection and other combinatorial principles at ℵ+2
Thomas Gilton, Sárka Stejskalová |
Ann. Pure Appl. Log. | 2 |
| 2024 | Indestructibility of some compactness principles over models of PFA
Radek Honzik, Chris Lambie-Hanson, Sárka Stejskalová |
Ann. Pure Appl. Log. | 3 |
| 2023 | Trees and stationary Reflection at double Successors of Regular CardinalsabstractAbstract We obtain an array of consistency results concerning trees and stationary reflection at double successors of regular cardinals $\kappa $ , updating some classical constructions in the process. This includes models of $\mathsf {CSR}(\kappa ^{++})\wedge {\sf TP}(\kappa ^{++})$ (both with and without ${\sf AP}(\kappa ^{++})$ ) and models of the conjunctions ${\sf SR}(\kappa ^{++}) \wedge \mathsf {wTP}(\kappa ^{++}) \wedge {\sf AP}(\kappa ^{++})$ and $\neg {\sf AP}(\kappa ^{++}) \wedge {\sf SR}(\kappa ^{++})$ (the latter was originally obtained in joint work by Krueger and the first author [9], and is here given using different methods). Analogs of these results with the failure of $\sf {SH}(\kappa ^{++})$ are given as well. Finally, we obtain all of our results with an arbitrarily large $2^\kappa $ , applying recent joint work by Honzik and the third author. Thomas Gilton, Maxwell Levine, Sárka Stejskalová |
J. Symb. Log. | 3 |
| 2021 | Easton's theorem for the tree property below ℵω
Sárka Stejskalová |
Ann. Pure Appl. Log. | 1 |
| 2020 | Indestructibility of the Tree PropertyabstractAbstract In the first part of the article, we show that if $\omega \le \kappa < \lambda$ are cardinals, ${\kappa ^{ < \kappa }} = \kappa$ , and λ is weakly compact, then in $V\left[M {\left( {\kappa ,\lambda } \right)} \right]$ the tree property at $$\lambda = \left( {\kappa ^{ + + } } \right)^{V\left[ {\left( {\kappa ,\lambda } \right)} \right]} $$ is indestructible under all ${\kappa ^ + }$ -cc forcing notions which live in $V\left[ {{\rm{Add}}\left( {\kappa ,\lambda } \right)} \right]$ , where ${\rm{Add}}\left( {\kappa ,\lambda } \right)$ is the Cohen forcing for adding λ-many subsets of κ and $\left( {\kappa ,\lambda } \right)$ is the standard Mitchell forcing for obtaining the tree property at $\lambda = \left( {\kappa ^{ + + } } \right)^{V\left[ {\left( {\kappa ,\lambda } \right)} \right]} $ . This result has direct applications to Prikry-type forcing notions and generalized cardinal invariants. In the second part, we assume that λ is supercompact and generalize the construction and obtain a model ${V^{\rm{*}}}$ , a generic extension of V, in which the tree property at ${\left( {{\kappa ^{ + + }}} \right)^{{V^{\rm{*}}}}}$ is indestructible under all ${\kappa ^ + }$ -cc forcing notions living in $V\left[ {{\rm{Add}}\left( {\kappa ,\lambda } \right)} \right]$ , and in addition under all forcing notions living in ${V^{\rm{*}}}$ which are ${\kappa ^ + }$ -closed and “liftable” in a prescribed sense (such as ${\kappa ^{ + + }}$ -directed closed forcings or well-met forcings which are ${\kappa ^{ + + }}$ -closed with the greatest lower bounds). Radek Honzik, Sárka Stejskalová |
J. Symb. Log. | 2 |