Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Shuo Xing

dblp:219/1709 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
2as first author
7since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 2 first-author · 6 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Language models and text generation · 23% Trustworthy machine learning · 23% Vision and language · 16%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 67% Approximation and online algorithms · 33%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reward design
reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards
1.012026
Does RLVR Extend Reasoning Boundaries? Investigating Capability Expansion in Vision-Language Models · ACL (1) 2026
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
spatial reasoning
1.012026
Does RLVR Extend Reasoning Boundaries? Investigating Capability Expansion in Vision-Language Models · ACL (1) 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
algorithmic fairness
0.912025
Fair Submodular Cover · ICLR 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › preference optimization
direct preference optimization
0.912025
Re-Align: Aligning Vision Language Models via Retrieval-Augmented Direct Preference Optimization · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness
0.912025
Fair Submodular Cover · ICLR 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
preference optimization
0.912025
Re-Align: Aligning Vision Language Models via Retrieval-Augmented Direct Preference Optimization · EMNLP 2025
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d scene understanding
semantic scene completion
0.912025
Uniocc: a Unified Benchmark for Occupancy Forecasting and Prediction in Autonomous Driving · ICCV 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
vision-language model alignment
0.912025
Re-Align: Aligning Vision Language Models via Retrieval-Augmented Direct Preference Optimization · EMNLP 2025
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation algorithms
0.912025
Fair Submodular Cover · ICLR 2025
Mathematical optimization › submodular optimization
submodular cover
0.912025
Fair Submodular Cover · ICLR 2025
Mathematical optimization
submodular optimization
0.912025
Fair Submodular Cover · ICLR 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model
0.312026
Does RLVR Extend Reasoning Boundaries? Investigating Capability Expansion in Vision-Language Models · ACL (1) 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

continuous relaxation · 1.7bicriteria approximation · 1.7synthetic maze generation · 1.0pass@k sampling · 1.0retrieval-augmented generation · 0.9direct preference optimization · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Does RLVR Extend Reasoning Boundaries? Investigating Capability Expansion in Vision-Language Models
abstract
Recent studies posit that Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) primarily amplifies behaviors inherent to the pre-training distribution rather than inducing new capabilities, but these insights are predominantly limited to language-only domains, leaving the dynamics of visual-centric spatial reasoning under-explored. To examine the impact of RLVR on the capability boundaries of Vision-Language Models (VLMs), we introduce \textbf{Ariadne}, a controlled framework based on synthetic maze navigation where the reasoning difficulty is precisely regulated by path length and the number of turns. We demonstrate that applying RLVR extends the spatial reasoning boundary, achieving success on problems where the base policy VLM consistently attains $0\%$ accuracy despite increasing pass@k sampling budgets, indicating that the optimized policy successfully navigates search spaces that were effectively unreachable by the base distribution. Furthermore, despite being trained exclusively on synthetic mazes, we evaluate the model on two real-world navigation benchmarks (MapBench and ReasonMap) in a zero-shot setting. The observed improvements in these out-of-domain tasks suggest genuine spatial reasoning capability expansion rather than mere sampling efficiency.
Minghe Shen, Zhuo Zhi, Chonghan Liu, Shuo Xing, Zhengzhong Tu
ACL (1)4
2026 An Adaptive SMU System with Single-Shot Transient Impedance Sensing and 1 mF Capacitive Driveability
Yinxuan Peng, Zhixuan Jiang, Shuo Xing, Yanjin Lyu, Yuanqi Hu
ISCAS3
2026 Multiple stage decoupling and Fusion Transformer based on multi-sensor features for cross-domain bearing fault diagnosis
Shuo Xing, Wenjie Bao, Changmin Cheng, Dangpeng Jin, Songyong Liu
Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell.1
2025 Re-Align: Aligning Vision Language Models via Retrieval-Augmented Direct Preference Optimization
abstract
Shuo Xing, Peiran Li, Yuping Wang, Ruizheng Bai, Yueqi Wang, Chan-Wei Hu, Chengxuan Qian, Huaxiu Yao, Zhengzhong Tu. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2025.
Shuo Xing, Ruizheng Bai, Chan-Wei Hu, Chengxuan Qian, Huaxiu Yao, Zhengzhong Tu
EMNLP1
2025 Uniocc: a Unified Benchmark for Occupancy Forecasting and Prediction in Autonomous Driving
Xiangyu Huang, Xiaokang Sun, Mingxuan Yan, Shuo Xing, Zhengzhong Tu, Jiachen Li 0001
ICCV5
2025 Fair Submodular Cover
abstract
Machine learning algorithms are becoming increasing prevalent in the modern world, and as a result there has been significant recent study into algorithmic fairness in order to minimize the possibility of unintentional bias or discrimination in these algorithms. Submodular optimization problems also arise in many machine learning applications, including those such as data summarization and clustering where fairness is an important concern. In this paper, we initiate the study of the Fair Submodular Cover Problem (FSC). Given a ground set $U$, a monotone submodular function $f:2^U\to\mathbb{R}_{\ge 0}$, and a threshold $\tau$, the goal of FSC is to find a balanced subset of $U$ with minimum cardinality such that $f(S)\ge\tau$. We first introduce discrete algorithms for FSC that achieve a bicriteria approximation ratio of $(\frac{1}{\varepsilon}, 1-O(\varepsilon))$. We then present a continuous algorithm that achieves a $(\ln\frac{1}{\varepsilon}, 1-O(\varepsilon))$-bicriteria approximation ratio, which matches the best approximation guarantee of submodular cover without a fairness constraint. Finally, we complement our theoretical results with a number of empirical evaluations that demonstrate the efficiency of our algorithms on instances of maximum coverage.
Shuo Xing, Samson Zhou, Victoria G. Crawford
ICLR2
2025 Adaptive Threshold Sampling for Pure Exploration in Submodular Bandits
abstract
We address the problem of submodular maximization under bandit feedback, where the objective function $f:2^U\to\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}$ can only be accessed through noisy, i.i.d. sub-Gaussian queries. This problem arises in many applications including influence maximization, diverse recommendation systems, and large-scale facility location optimization. In this paper, we focus on the pure-exploration setting, where the goal is to identify a high-quality solution set using as few noisy queries as possible. We propose an efficient adaptive sampling strategy, called Confident Sample (CS) that can serve as a versatile subroutine to propose approximation algorithms for many submodular maximization problems. Our algorithms achieve approximation guarantees arbitrarily close to the standard value oracle setting and are highly sample-efficient. We propose and analyze algorithms for monotone submodular maximization with cardinality and matroid constraints, as well as unconstrained non-monotone submodular maximization. Our theoretical analysis is complemented by empirical evaluation on real instances, demonstrating the superior sample efficiency of our proposed algorithm relative to alternative approaches.
Shuo Xing, Victoria G. Crawford
UAI2