Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Hanwen Zha
dblp:219/1743
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
4 papers |
Information retrieval · 50% Knowledge graphs · 33% Data mining · 17% | |
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 39% Information extraction and text analysis · 37% Language models and text generation · 24% |
Topics — the 18 heaviest of 19, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
retrieval-augmented generation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | CRAG - Comprehensive RAG Benchmark · NeurIPS 2024 |
Information retrieval › question answering
question answering benchmark |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | CRAG - Comprehensive RAG Benchmark · NeurIPS 2024 |
Information retrieval
retrieval evaluation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | CRAG - Comprehensive RAG Benchmark · NeurIPS 2024 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge graph reasoning
path-based reasoning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Inductive Relation Prediction by BERT · AAAI 2022 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
relational reasoning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Inductive Relation Prediction by BERT · AAAI 2022 |
Knowledge graphs › link prediction › relation prediction
inductive relation prediction |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Inductive Relation Prediction by BERT · AAAI 2022 |
Knowledge graphs
link prediction |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Inductive Relation Prediction by BERT · AAAI 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › relation extraction › document-level relation extraction
cross-sentence relation extraction |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Mining Algorithm Roadmap in Scientific Publications · KDD 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › relation extraction
distant supervision |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Global Textual Relation Embedding for Relational Understanding · ACL (1) 2019 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge graph
relation embedding |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Global Textual Relation Embedding for Relational Understanding · ACL (1) 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › document analysis › scholarly text analysis
scientific text mining |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Mining Algorithm Roadmap in Scientific Publications · KDD 2019 |
Information retrieval
concept embedding |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | HierCon: Hierarchical Organization of Technical Documents Based on Concepts · ICDM 2019 |
Data mining › text mining › text classification
hierarchical text classification |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | HierCon: Hierarchical Organization of Technical Documents Based on Concepts · ICDM 2019 |
Data mining › text mining
text classification |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | HierCon: Hierarchical Organization of Technical Documents Based on Concepts · ICDM 2019 |
Information retrieval › text analysis
text representation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | HierCon: Hierarchical Organization of Technical Documents Based on Concepts · ICDM 2019 |
Knowledge graphs
knowledge graph exploration |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | CRAG - Comprehensive RAG Benchmark · NeurIPS 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model › large language model adaptation
pre-trained language model fine-tuning |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Inductive Relation Prediction by BERT · AAAI 2022 |
Knowledge graphs › knowledge graph construction › knowledge extraction
scientific knowledge extraction |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Mining Algorithm Roadmap in Scientific Publications · KDD 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
retrieval-augmented generation · 1.5reasoning path · 1.1fine-tuning · 1.1BERT · 1.1weak supervision · 1.1cross-sentence attention network · 0.8dependency path embedding · 0.4concept embedding · 0.4co-occurrence statistics · 0.4embedding · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Head-to-Tail: How Knowledgeable are Large Language Models (LLMs)? A.K.A. Will LLMs Replace Knowledge Graphs?abstractKai Sun, Yifan Xu, Hanwen Zha, Yue Liu, Xin Luna Dong. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024. Kai Sun 0006, Yifan Ethan Xu, Hanwen Zha, Xin Dong 0001 |
NAACL-HLT | 3 |
| 2024 | CRAG - Comprehensive RAG BenchmarkabstractRetrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has recently emerged as a promising solution to alleviate Large Language Model (LLM)’s deficiency in lack of knowledge. Existing RAG datasets, however, do not adequately represent the diverse and dynamic nature of real-world Question Answering (QA) tasks. To bridge this gap, we introduce the Comprehensive RAG Benchmark (CRAG), a factual question answering benchmark of 4,409 question-answer pairs and mock APIs to simulate web and Knowledge Graph (KG) search. CRAG is designed to encapsulate a diverse array of questions across five domains and eight question categories, reflecting varied entity popularity from popular to long-tail, and temporal dynamisms ranging from years to seconds. Our evaluation on this benchmark highlights the gap to fully trustworthy QA. Whereas most advanced LLMs achieve $\le 34\%$ accuracy on CRAG, adding RAG in a straightforward manner improves the accuracy only to 44%. State-of-the-art industry RAG solutions only answer 63% questions without any hallucination. CRAG also reveals much lower accuracy in answering questions regarding facts with higher dynamism, lower popularity, or higher complexity, suggesting future research directions. The CRAG benchmark laid the groundwork for a KDD Cup 2024 challenge, attracted thousands of participants and submissions. We commit to maintaining CRAG to serve research communities in advancing RAG solutions and general QA solutions. CRAG is available at https://github.com/facebookresearch/CRAG/. Kai Sun 0006, Hao Xin, Yushi Sun, Nikita Bhalla, Xiangsen Chen, Sajal Choudhary, Rongze Daniel Gui, Ziran Will Jiang, Ziyu Jiang, Lingkun Kong, Brian Moran, Eting Yuan, Hanwen Zha, Nan Tang 0001, Lei Chen 0002, Nicolas Scheffer, Rakesh Wanga, Scott Yih, Xin Dong 0001 |
NeurIPS | 18 |
| 2022 | Inductive Relation Prediction by BERTabstractRelation prediction in knowledge graphs is dominated by embedding based methods which mainly focus on the transductive setting. Unfortunately, they are not able to handle inductive learning where unseen entities and relations are present and cannot take advantage of prior knowledge. Furthermore, their inference process is not easily explainable. In this work, we propose an all-in-one solution, called BERTRL (BERT-based Relational Learning), which leverages pre-trained language model and fine-tunes it by taking relation instances and their possible reasoning paths as training samples. BERTRL outperforms the SOTAs in 15 out of 18 cases in both inductive and transductive settings. Meanwhile, it demonstrates strong generalization capability in few-shot learning and is explainable. The data and code can be found at https://github.com/zhw12/BERTRL. Hanwen Zha, Zhiyu Chen 0002, Xifeng Yan |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2019 | Global Textual Relation Embedding for Relational UnderstandingabstractPre-trained embeddings such as word embeddings and sentence embeddings are fundamental tools facilitating a wide range of downstream NLP tasks.In this work, we investigate how to learn a general-purpose embedding of textual relations, defined as the shortest dependency path between entities.Textual relation embedding provides a level of knowledge between word/phrase level and sentence level, and we show that it can facilitate downstream tasks requiring relational understanding of the text.To learn such an embedding, we create the largest distant supervision dataset by linking the entire English ClueWeb09 corpus to Freebase.We use global co-occurrence statistics between textual and knowledge base relations as the supervision signal to train the embedding.Evaluation on two relational understanding tasks demonstrates the usefulness of the learned textual relation embedding. Zhiyu Chen 0002, Hanwen Zha, Honglei Liu 0001, Wenhu Chen, Xifeng Yan, Yu Su 0001 |
ACL (1) | 2 |
| 2019 | HierCon: Hierarchical Organization of Technical Documents Based on ConceptsabstractIn this work we study the hierarchical organization of technical documents, where given a set of documents and a hierarchy of categories, the goal is to assign documents to their corresponding categories. Unlike prior work on supervised hierarchical document categorization that relies on large amount of labeled training data, which is expensive to obtain in closed technical domain and tends to stale as new knowledge emerges, we study this problem in a weak supervision setting, by leveraging semantic information from concepts. The core idea is to project both documents and categories into a common concept embedding space, where their fine-grained similarity can be easily and effectively computed. Experiments over real-world datasets from the subject of computer science, physics & mathematics, and medicine demonstrated the superior performance of our approach over a wide range of state of the art baseline approaches. Keqian Li, Semih Yavuz, Hanwen Zha, Yu Su 0001, Xifeng Yan |
ICDM | 4 |
| 2019 | Mining Algorithm Roadmap in Scientific PublicationsabstractThe number of scientific publications is ever increasing. The long time to digest a scientific paper posts great challenges on the number of papers people can read, which impedes a quick grasp of major activities in new research areas especially for intelligence analysts and novice researchers. To accelerate such a process, we first define a new problem called mining algorithm roadmap in scientific publications, and then propose a new weakly supervised method to build the roadmap. The algorithm roadmap describes evolutionary relation between different algorithms, and sketches the undergoing research and the dynamics of the area. It is a tool for analysts and researchers to locate the successors and families of algorithms when analyzing and surveying a research field. We first propose abbreviated words as candidates for algorithms and then use tables as weak supervision to extract these candidates and labels. Next we propose a new method called Cross-sentence Attention NeTwork for cOmparative Relation (CANTOR) to extract comparative algorithms from text. Finally, we derive order for individual algorithm pairs with time and frequency to construct the algorithm roadmap. Through comprehensive experiments, our proposed algorithm shows its superiority over the baseline methods on the proposed task. Hanwen Zha, Wenhu Chen, Keqian Li, Xifeng Yan |
KDD | 1 |
| 2018 | Concept Mining via EmbeddingabstractIn this work, we study the problem of concept mining, which serves as the first step in transforming unstructured text into structured information, and supports downstream analytical tasks such as information extraction, organization, recommendation and search. Previous work mainly relies on statistical signals, existing knowledge bases, or predefined linguistic patterns. In this work, we propose a novel approach that mines concepts based on their occurrence contexts, by learning embedding vector representations that summarize the context information for each possible candidates, and use these embeddings to evaluate the concept's global quality and their fitness to each local context. Experiments over several real-world corpora demonstrate the superior performance of our method. A publicly available implementation is provided at https://github.com/kleeeeea/ECON. Keqian Li, Hanwen Zha, Yu Su 0001, Xifeng Yan |
ICDM | 2 |
| 2018 | Unsupervised Neural Categorization for Scientific PublicationsabstractMost conventional document categorization methods require a large number of documents with labeled categories for training. These methods are hard to be applied in scenarios, such as scientific publications, where training data is expensive to obtain and categories could change over years and across domains. In this work, we propose UNEC, an unsupervised representation learning model that directly categories documents without the need of labeled training data. Specifically, we develop a novel cascade embedding approach. We first embed concepts, i.e., significant phrases mined from scientific publications, into continuous vectors, which capture concept semantics. Based on the concept similarity graph built from the concept embedding, we further embed concepts into a hidden category space, where the category information of concepts becomes explicit. Finally we categorize documents by jointly considering the category attribution of their concepts. Our experimental results show that UNEC significantly outperforms several strong baselines on a number of real scientific corpora, under both automatic and manual evaluation. Keqian Li, Hanwen Zha, Yu Su 0001, Xifeng Yan |
SDM | 2 |