Imitation learning enables robots to learn new tasks from human examples. One fundamental limitation while learning from humans is causal confusion. Causal confusion occurs when the robot’s observations include both task-relevant and extraneous information: for instance, a robot’s camera might see not only the intended goal, but also clutter and changes in lighting within its environment. Because the robot does not know which aspects of its observations are important a priori, it often misinterprets the human’s examples and fails to learn the desired task. To address this issue, we highlight that — while the robot learner may not know what to focus on — the human teacher does. In this paper we propose that the human proactively marks key parts of their task with small, lightweight beacons. Under our framework (RECON) the human attaches these beacons to task-relevant objects before providing demonstrations: as the human shows examples of the task, beacons track the position of marked objects. We then harness this offline beacon data to train a task-relevant state embedding. Specifically, we embed the robot’s observations to a latent state that is correlated with the measured beacon readings: in practice, this causes the robot to autonomously filter out extraneous observations and make decisions based on features learned from the beacon data. Our simulations and a real robot experiment suggest that this framework for human-placed beacons mitigates causal confusion. Indeed, we find that using RECON significantly reduces the number of demonstrations needed to convey the task, lowering the overall time required for human teaching. See videos here: https://youtu.be/oy85xJvtLSU

While haptics research has traditionally focused on the fingertips and hands, other locations on the body provide large areas of skin that could be utilized to relay large-area haptic sensations. Researchers have thus developed wearable devices that use distributed vibrotactile actuators and distributed pneumatic force displays, but these methods have limitations. In prior work, we presented a novel actuation technique involving stacking pneumatic pouches and evaluated the actuator output. In this work, we developed a wearable haptic device using this actuation technique and evaluated how the actuator output is perceived. We conducted a user study with 20 participants to evaluate users' perception thresholds, ability to localize, and ability to detect differences in contact area and compare their perception using the stacked pneumatic pouch actuation to traditional single-layer pouch actuation. We also used our device with stacked pneumatic actuation in a demonstration of a haptic hug that replicates the dynamics, pressure profile, and mapping to the human back, showcasing how this actuation technique can be used to create novel haptic stimuli.

Robots hold great potential for supporting exercise and physical therapy, but such systems are often cumbersome to set up and require expert supervision. We aim to solve these concerns by combining Captury Live, a real-time markerless motion-capture system, with a Rethink Robotics Baxter Research Robot to create the Robot Interaction Studio. We evaluated this platform for unsupervised human-robot interaction (HRI) through a 75-minute-long user study with seven adults who were given minimal instructions and no feedback about their actions. The robot used sounds, facial expressions, facial colors, head motions, and arm motions to sequentially present three categories of cues in randomized order while constantly rotating its face screen to look at the user. Analysis of the captured user motions shows that the cue type significantly affected the distance subjects traveled and the amount of time they spent within the robot’s reachable workspace, in alignment with the design of the cues. Heat map visualizations of the recorded user hand positions confirm that users tended to mimic the robot’s arm poses. Despite some initial frustration, taking part in this study did not significantly change user opinions of the robot. We reflect on the advantages of the proposed approach to unsupervised HRI as well as the limitations and possible future extensions of our system.