Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Juan S. Campos
dblp:219/7664
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 37% Graph learning · 35% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 21% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational science and engineering · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 77% Distributed computing theory · 23% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
few-shot learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | The Catechol Benchmark: Time-series Solvent Selection Data for Few-shot Machine Learning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Computational science and engineering
chemistry |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | The Catechol Benchmark: Time-series Solvent Selection Data for Few-shot Machine Learning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › verification
graph neural network verification |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Verifying message-passing neural networks via topology-based bounds tightening · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
message passing |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Verifying message-passing neural networks via topology-based bounds tightening · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Verifying message-passing neural networks via topology-based bounds tightening · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Optimizing over trained GNNs via symmetry breaking · NeurIPS 2023 |
Mathematical optimization › integer programming
mixed-integer optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Optimizing over trained GNNs via symmetry breaking · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
active learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | The Catechol Benchmark: Time-series Solvent Selection Data for Few-shot Machine Learning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Distributed computing theory
symmetry breaking |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Optimizing over trained GNNs via symmetry breaking · NeurIPS 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
transfer learning · 1.7regression · 1.7feature engineering · 1.7active learning · 1.7graph indexing · 1.3topology-based bounds tightening · 0.8mixed-integer optimization · 0.8branch-and-cut · 0.8symmetry-breaking constraints · 0.7symmetry breaking constraints · 0.7mixed-integer programming · 0.7mixed integer programming · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | The Catechol Benchmark: Time-series Solvent Selection Data for Few-shot Machine LearningabstractMachine learning has promised to change the landscape of laboratory chemistry, with impressive results in molecular property prediction and reaction retro-synthesis. However, chemical datasets are often inaccessible to the machine learning community as they tend to require cleaning, thorough understanding of the chemistry, or are simply not available. In this paper, we introduce a novel dataset for yield prediction, providing the first-ever transient flow dataset for machine learning benchmarking, covering over 1200 process conditions. While previous datasets focus on discrete parameters, our experimental set-up allow us to sample a large number of continuous process conditions, generating new challenges for machine learning models. We focus on solvent selection, a task that is particularly difficult to model theoretically and therefore ripe for machine learning applications. We showcase benchmarking for regression algorithms, transfer-learning approaches, feature engineering, and active learning, with important applications towards solvent replacement and sustainable manufacturing. Toby Boyne, Juan S. Campos, Rebecca D. Langdon, Jixiang Qing, Yilin Xie, Shiqiang Zhang, Calvin Tsay, Ruth Misener, Daniel W. Davies, Kim E. Jelfs, Sarah Boyall, Thomas M. Dixon, Linden Schrecker, Jose Pablo Folch |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2024 | Verifying message-passing neural networks via topology-based bounds tighteningabstractSince graph neural networks (GNNs) are often vulnerable to attack, we need to know when we can trust them. We develop a computationally effective approach towards providing robust certificates for message-passing neural networks (MPNNs) using a Rectified Linear Unit (ReLU) activation function. Because our work builds on mixed-integer optimization, it encodes a wide variety of subproblems, for example it admits (i) both adding and removing edges, (ii) both global and local budgets, and (iii) both topological perturbations and feature modifications. Our key technology, topology-based bounds tightening, uses graph structure to tighten bounds. We also experiment with aggressive bounds tightening to dynamically change the optimization constraints by tightening variable bounds. To demonstrate the effectiveness of these strategies, we implement an extension to the open-source branch-and-cut solver SCIP. We test on both node and graph classification problems and consider topological attacks that both add and remove edges. Christopher Hojny, Shiqiang Zhang, Juan S. Campos, Ruth Misener |
ICML | 3 |
| 2023 | Optimizing over trained GNNs via symmetry breakingabstractOptimization over trained machine learning models has applications including: verification, minimizing neural acquisition functions, and integrating a trained surrogate into a larger decision-making problem. This paper formulates and solves optimization problems constrained by trained graph neural networks (GNNs). To circumvent the symmetry issue caused by graph isomorphism, we propose two types of symmetry-breaking constraints: one indexing a node 0 and one indexing the remaining nodes by lexicographically ordering their neighbor sets. To guarantee that adding these constraints will not remove all symmetric solutions, we construct a graph indexing algorithm and prove that the resulting graph indexing satisfies the proposed symmetry-breaking constraints. For the classical GNN architectures considered in this paper, optimizing over a GNN with a fixed graph is equivalent to optimizing over a dense neural network. Thus, we study the case where the input graph is not fixed, implying that each edge is a decision variable, and develop two mixed-integer optimization formulations. To test our symmetry-breaking strategies and optimization formulations, we consider an application in molecular design. Shiqiang Zhang, Juan S. Campos, Christian Feldmann, David Walz, Frederik Sandfort, Miriam Mathea, Calvin Tsay, Ruth Misener |
NeurIPS | 2 |