Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yura Malitsky
dblp:219/7903
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
2as first author
5since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 2 first-author · 5 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
7 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 98% Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 2% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 20 heaviest of 20, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization |
1.7 | 3 | 2024 | Adaptive Proximal Gradient Method for Convex Optimization · NeurIPS 2024 A first-order primal-dual method with adaptivity to local smoothness · NeurIPS 2021 Adaptive Gradient Descent without Descent · ICML 2020 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization
variational inequality |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | Beyond the Golden Ratio for Variational Inequality Algorithms · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 Stochastic Variance Reduction for Variational Inequality Methods · COLT 2022 |
Mathematical optimization
gradient descent |
1.2 | 2 | 2024 | Adaptive Proximal Gradient Method for Convex Optimization · NeurIPS 2024 Adaptive Gradient Descent without Descent · ICML 2020 |
Mathematical optimization
adaptive step size |
1.1 | 2 | 2023 | Beyond the Golden Ratio for Variational Inequality Algorithms · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 Adaptive Gradient Descent without Descent · ICML 2020 |
Mathematical optimization › minimax optimization
convex-concave optimization |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | Stochastic Variance Reduction for Variational Inequality Methods · COLT 2022 A first-order primal-dual method with adaptivity to local smoothness · NeurIPS 2021 |
Mathematical optimization
nonconvex optimization |
0.8 | 2 | 2020 | Adaptive Gradient Descent without Descent · ICML 2020 Model Function Based Conditional Gradient Method with Armijo-like Line Search · ICML 2019 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › proximal methods
proximal gradient method |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Adaptive Proximal Gradient Method for Convex Optimization · NeurIPS 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › variational inequality
monotone variational inequalities |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Beyond the Golden Ratio for Variational Inequality Algorithms · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Mathematical optimization › stochastic optimization
variance reduction |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Stochastic Variance Reduction for Variational Inequality Methods · COLT 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
non-convex optimization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Convergence of adaptive algorithms for constrained weakly convex optimization · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic optimization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Convergence of adaptive algorithms for constrained weakly convex optimization · NeurIPS 2021 |
Mathematical optimization
minimax optimization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | A first-order primal-dual method with adaptivity to local smoothness · NeurIPS 2021 |
Mathematical optimization
primal-dual method |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | A first-order primal-dual method with adaptivity to local smoothness · NeurIPS 2021 |
Mathematical optimization › online optimization
online convex optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A new regret analysis for Adam-type algorithms · ICML 2020 |
Mathematical optimization › online optimization
regret bounds |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A new regret analysis for Adam-type algorithms · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › optimization › continuous optimization
non-smooth optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Model Function Based Conditional Gradient Method with Armijo-like Line Search · ICML 2019 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › first-order methods
conditional gradient method |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Model Function Based Conditional Gradient Method with Armijo-like Line Search · ICML 2019 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › non-cooperative game › strategic game
matrix game |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Stochastic Variance Reduction for Variational Inequality Methods · COLT 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
constrained optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Convergence of adaptive algorithms for constrained weakly convex optimization · NeurIPS 2021 |
Mathematical optimization
stochastic optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | A new regret analysis for Adam-type algorithms · ICML 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
local curvature · 0.8adaptive step size · 0.8weak minty solutions · 0.7optimistic gradient descent ascent · 0.7golden ratio algorithm · 0.7forward-reflected-backward method · 0.6forward-backward-forward method · 0.6extragradient method · 0.6bregman divergence · 0.6moreau envelope · 0.5condat-vũ algorithm · 0.5AMSGrad · 0.5gauss-newton · 0.4conditional gradient · 0.4armijo line search · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Adaptive Proximal Gradient Method for Convex OptimizationabstractIn this paper, we explore two fundamental first-order algorithms in convex optimization, namely, gradient descent (GD) and proximal gradient method (ProxGD). Our focus is on making these algorithms entirely adaptive by leveraging local curvature information of smooth functions. We propose adaptive versions of GD and ProxGD that are based on observed gradient differences and, thus, have no added computational costs. Moreover, we prove convergence of our methods assuming only local Lipschitzness of the gradient. In addition, the proposed versions allow for even larger stepsizes than those initially suggested in [MM20]. Yura Malitsky, Konstantin Mishchenko |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2023 | Beyond the Golden Ratio for Variational Inequality AlgorithmsabstractWe improve the understanding of the golden ratio algorithm, which solves monotone variational inequalities (VI) and convex-concave min-max problems via the distinctive feature of adapting the step sizes to the local Lipschitz constants. Adaptive step sizes not only eliminate the need to pick hyperparameters, but they also remove the necessity of global Lipschitz continuity and can increase from one iteration to the next. We first establish the equivalence of this algorithm with popular VI methods such as reflected gradient, Popov or optimistic gradient descent-ascent (OGDA) in the unconstrained case with constant step sizes. We then move on to the constrained setting and introduce a new analysis that allows to use larger step sizes, to complete the bridge between the golden ratio algorithm and the existing algorithms in the literature. Doing so, we actually eliminate the link between the golden ratio {$\frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2}$} and the algorithm. Moreover, we improve the adaptive version of the algorithm, first by removing the maximum step size hyperparameter (an artifact from the analysis), and secondly, by adjusting it to nonmonotone problems with weak Minty solutions, with superior empirical performance. Ahmet Alacaoglu, Axel Böhm, Yura Malitsky |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 3 |
| 2022 | Stochastic Variance Reduction for Variational Inequality MethodsabstractWe propose stochastic variance reduced algorithms for solving convex-concave saddle point problems, monotone variational inequalities, and monotone inclusions. Our framework applies to extragradient, forward-backward-forward, and forward-reflected-backward methods both in Euclidean and Bregman setups. All proposed methods converge in exactly the same setting as their deterministic counterparts and they either match or improve the best-known complexities for solving structured min-max problems. Our results reinforce the correspondence between variance reduction in variational inequalities and minimization. We also illustrate the improvements of our approach with numerical evaluations on matrix games. Ahmet Alacaoglu, Yura Malitsky |
COLT | 2 |
| 2021 | Convergence of adaptive algorithms for constrained weakly convex optimizationabstractWe analyze the adaptive first order algorithm AMSGrad, for solving a constrained stochastic optimization problem with a weakly convex objective. We prove the $\mathcal{\tilde O}(t^{-1/2})$ rate of convergence for the squared norm of the gradient of Moreau envelope, which is the standard stationarity measure for this class of problems. It matches the known rates that adaptive algorithms enjoy for the specific case of unconstrained smooth nonconvex stochastic optimization. Our analysis works with mini-batch size of $1$, constant first and second order moment parameters, and possibly unbounded optimization domains. Finally, we illustrate the applications and extensions of our results to specific problems and algorithms. Ahmet Alacaoglu, Yura Malitsky, Volkan Cevher |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2021 | A first-order primal-dual method with adaptivity to local smoothnessabstractWe consider the problem of finding a saddle point for the convex-concave objective $\min_x \max_y f(x) + \langle Ax, y\rangle - g^*(y)$, where $f$ is a convex function with locally Lipschitz gradient and $g$ is convex and possibly non-smooth. We propose an adaptive version of the Condat-Vũ algorithm, which alternates between primal gradient steps and dual proximal steps. The method achieves stepsize adaptivity through a simple rule involving $\|A\|$ and the norm of recently computed gradients of $f$. Under standard assumptions, we prove an $\mathcal{O}(k^{-1})$ ergodic convergence rate. Furthermore, when $f$ is also locally strongly convex and $A$ has full row rank we show that our method converges with a linear rate. Numerical experiments are provided for illustrating the practical performance of the algorithm. Maria-Luiza Vladarean, Yura Malitsky, Volkan Cevher |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2020 | Revisiting Stochastic ExtragradientabstractWe fix a fundamental issue in the stochastic extragradient method by providing a new sampling strategy that is motivated by approximating implicit updates. Since the existing stochastic extragradient algorithm, called Mirror-Prox, of (Juditsky, 2011) diverges on a simple bilinear problem when the domain is not bounded, we prove guarantees for solving variational inequality that go beyond existing settings. Furthermore, we illustrate numerically that the proposed variant converges faster than many other methods on several convex-concave saddle-point problems. We also discuss how extragradient can be applied to training Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) and how it compares to other methods. Our experiments on GANs demonstrate that the introduced approach may make the training faster in terms of data passes, while its higher iteration complexity makes the advantage smaller. Konstantin Mishchenko, Dmitry Kovalev, Egor Shulgin, Peter Richtárik, Yura Malitsky |
AISTATS | 5 |
| 2020 | A new regret analysis for Adam-type algorithmsabstractIn this paper, we focus on a theory-practice gap for Adam and its variants (AMSGrad, AdamNC, etc.). In practice, these algorithms are used with a constant first-order moment parameter $\beta_{1}$ (typically between $0.9$ and $0.99$). In theory, regret guarantees for online convex optimization require a rapidly decaying $\beta_{1}\to0$ schedule. We show that this is an artifact of the standard analysis, and we propose a novel framework that allows us to derive optimal, data-dependent regret bounds with a constant $\beta_{1}$, without further assumptions. We also demonstrate the flexibility of our analysis on a wide range of different algorithms and settings. Ahmet Alacaoglu, Yura Malitsky, Panayotis Mertikopoulos, Volkan Cevher |
ICML | 2 |
| 2020 | Adaptive Gradient Descent without DescentabstractWe present a strikingly simple proof that two rules are sufficient to automate gradient descent: 1) don’t increase the stepsize too fast and 2) don’t overstep the local curvature. No need for functional values, no line search, no information about the function except for the gradients. By following these rules, you get a method adaptive to the local geometry, with convergence guarantees depending only on the smoothness in a neighborhood of a solution. Given that the problem is convex, our method converges even if the global smoothness constant is infinity. As an illustration, it can minimize arbitrary continuously twice-differentiable convex function. We examine its performance on a range of convex and nonconvex problems, including logistic regression and matrix factorization. Yura Malitsky, Konstantin Mishchenko |
ICML | 1 |
| 2019 | Model Function Based Conditional Gradient Method with Armijo-like Line SearchabstractThe Conditional Gradient Method is generalized to a class of non-smooth non-convex optimization problems with many applications in machine learning. The proposed algorithm iterates by minimizing so-called model functions over the constraint set. Complemented with an Armijo line search procedure, we prove that subsequences converge to a stationary point. The abstract framework of model functions provides great flexibility in the design of concrete algorithms. As special cases, for example, we develop an algorithm for additive composite problems and an algorithm for non-linear composite problems which leads to a Gauss-Newton-type algorithm. Both instances are novel in non-smooth non-convex optimization and come with numerous applications in machine learning. We perform an experiment on a non-linear robust regression problem and discuss the flexibility of the proposed framework in several matrix factorization formulations. Peter Ochs, Yura Malitsky |
ICML | 2 |