EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Maciej Janowski
dblp:219/8260
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 65% Efficient and distributed learning · 22% Learning theory · 13% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
hyperparameter optimization |
1.3 | 2 | 2023 | PriorBand: Practical Hyperparameter Optimization in the Age of Deep Learning · NeurIPS 2023 Scaling Laws for Hyperparameter Optimization · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Scaling Laws for Hyperparameter Optimization · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
learning curve extrapolation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Scaling Laws for Hyperparameter Optimization · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › hyperparameter optimization
multi-fidelity hyperparameter tuning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | PriorBand: Practical Hyperparameter Optimization in the Age of Deep Learning · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › neural network theory
power-law scaling |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Scaling Laws for Hyperparameter Optimization · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › automated machine learning › neural architecture search
hyperparameter and architecture selection |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | JAHS-Bench-201: A Foundation For Research On Joint Architecture And Hyperparameter Search · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › automated machine learning
neural architecture search |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | JAHS-Bench-201: A Foundation For Research On Joint Architecture And Hyperparameter Search · NeurIPS 2022 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | JAHS-Bench-201: A Foundation For Research On Joint Architecture And Hyperparameter Search · NeurIPS 2022 |
Performance modeling and evaluation › benchmarking › parallel benchmark suites
NAS parallel benchmarks |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | JAHS-Bench-201: A Foundation For Research On Joint Architecture And Hyperparameter Search · NeurIPS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
surrogate benchmarks · 1.1multi-fidelity optimization · 1.1proxy task · 0.7gray-box evaluation · 0.7ensemble of neural networks · 0.7deep power laws · 0.7bayesian optimization · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Scaling Laws for Hyperparameter OptimizationabstractHyperparameter optimization is an important subfield of machine learning that focuses on tuning the hyperparameters of a chosen algorithm to achieve peak performance. Recently, there has been a stream of methods that tackle the issue of hyperparameter optimization, however, most of the methods do not exploit the dominant power law nature of learning curves for Bayesian optimization. In this work, we propose Deep Power Laws (DPL), an ensemble of neural network models conditioned to yield predictions that follow a power-law scaling pattern. Our method dynamically decides which configurations to pause and train incrementally by making use of gray-box evaluations. We compare our method against 7 state-of-the-art competitors on 3 benchmarks related to tabular, image, and NLP datasets covering 59 diverse tasks. Our method achieves the best results across all benchmarks by obtaining the best any-time results compared to all competitors. Arlind Kadra, Maciej Janowski, Martin Wistuba, Josif Grabocka |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2023 | PriorBand: Practical Hyperparameter Optimization in the Age of Deep LearningabstractHyperparameters of Deep Learning (DL) pipelines are crucial for their downstream performance.
While a large number of methods for Hyperparameter Optimization (HPO) have been developed, their incurred costs are often untenable for modern DL.
Consequently, manual experimentation is still the most prevalent approach to optimize hyperparameters, relying on the researcher's intuition, domain knowledge, and cheap preliminary explorations.
To resolve this misalignment between HPO algorithms and DL researchers, we propose PriorBand, an HPO algorithm tailored to DL, able to utilize both expert beliefs and cheap proxy tasks.
Empirically, we demonstrate PriorBand's efficiency across a range of DL benchmarks and show its gains under informative expert input and robustness against poor expert beliefs. Neeratyoy Mallik, Edward Bergman, Carl Hvarfner, Danny Stoll, Maciej Janowski, Marius Lindauer, Luigi Nardi, Frank Hutter |
NeurIPS | 5 |
| 2022 | JAHS-Bench-201: A Foundation For Research On Joint Architecture And Hyperparameter SearchabstractThe past few years have seen the development of many benchmarks for Neural Architecture Search (NAS), fueling rapid progress in NAS research. However, recent work, which shows that good hyperparameter settings can be more important than using the best architecture, calls for a shift in focus towards Joint Architecture and Hyperparameter Search (JAHS). Therefore, we present JAHS-Bench-201, the first collection of surrogate benchmarks for JAHS, built to also facilitate research on multi-objective, cost-aware and (multi) multi-fidelity optimization algorithms. To the best of our knowledge, JAHS-Bench-201 is based on the most extensive dataset of neural network performance data in the public domain. It is composed of approximately 161 million data points and 20 performance metrics for three deep learning tasks, while featuring a 14-dimensional search and fidelity space that extends the popular NAS-Bench-201 space. With JAHS-Bench-201, we hope to democratize research on JAHS and lower the barrier to entry of an extremely compute intensive field, e.g., by reducing the compute time to run a JAHS algorithm from 5 days to only a few seconds. Archit Bansal, Danny Stoll, Maciej Janowski, Arber Zela, Frank Hutter |
NeurIPS | 3 |