Maciej Janowski

dblp:219/8260 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Optimization for machine learning · 65% Efficient and distributed learning · 22% Learning theory · 13%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
hyperparameter optimization
1.322023
PriorBand: Practical Hyperparameter Optimization in the Age of Deep Learning · NeurIPS 2023
Scaling Laws for Hyperparameter Optimization · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization
0.712023
Scaling Laws for Hyperparameter Optimization · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
learning curve extrapolation
0.712023
Scaling Laws for Hyperparameter Optimization · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › hyperparameter optimization
multi-fidelity hyperparameter tuning
0.712023
PriorBand: Practical Hyperparameter Optimization in the Age of Deep Learning · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Learning theory › neural network theory
power-law scaling
0.712023
Scaling Laws for Hyperparameter Optimization · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › automated machine learning › neural architecture search
hyperparameter and architecture selection
0.612022
JAHS-Bench-201: A Foundation For Research On Joint Architecture And Hyperparameter Search · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › automated machine learning
neural architecture search
0.612022
JAHS-Bench-201: A Foundation For Research On Joint Architecture And Hyperparameter Search · NeurIPS 2022
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking
0.612022
JAHS-Bench-201: A Foundation For Research On Joint Architecture And Hyperparameter Search · NeurIPS 2022
Performance modeling and evaluation › benchmarking › parallel benchmark suites
NAS parallel benchmarks
0.612022
JAHS-Bench-201: A Foundation For Research On Joint Architecture And Hyperparameter Search · NeurIPS 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

surrogate benchmarks · 1.1multi-fidelity optimization · 1.1proxy task · 0.7gray-box evaluation · 0.7ensemble of neural networks · 0.7deep power laws · 0.7bayesian optimization · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Scaling Laws for Hyperparameter Optimization
abstract
Hyperparameter optimization is an important subfield of machine learning that focuses on tuning the hyperparameters of a chosen algorithm to achieve peak performance. Recently, there has been a stream of methods that tackle the issue of hyperparameter optimization, however, most of the methods do not exploit the dominant power law nature of learning curves for Bayesian optimization. In this work, we propose Deep Power Laws (DPL), an ensemble of neural network models conditioned to yield predictions that follow a power-law scaling pattern. Our method dynamically decides which configurations to pause and train incrementally by making use of gray-box evaluations. We compare our method against 7 state-of-the-art competitors on 3 benchmarks related to tabular, image, and NLP datasets covering 59 diverse tasks. Our method achieves the best results across all benchmarks by obtaining the best any-time results compared to all competitors.
Arlind Kadra, Maciej Janowski, Martin Wistuba, Josif Grabocka
NeurIPS2
2023 PriorBand: Practical Hyperparameter Optimization in the Age of Deep Learning
abstract
Hyperparameters of Deep Learning (DL) pipelines are crucial for their downstream performance. While a large number of methods for Hyperparameter Optimization (HPO) have been developed, their incurred costs are often untenable for modern DL. Consequently, manual experimentation is still the most prevalent approach to optimize hyperparameters, relying on the researcher's intuition, domain knowledge, and cheap preliminary explorations. To resolve this misalignment between HPO algorithms and DL researchers, we propose PriorBand, an HPO algorithm tailored to DL, able to utilize both expert beliefs and cheap proxy tasks. Empirically, we demonstrate PriorBand's efficiency across a range of DL benchmarks and show its gains under informative expert input and robustness against poor expert beliefs.
Neeratyoy Mallik, Edward Bergman, Carl Hvarfner, Danny Stoll, Maciej Janowski, Marius Lindauer, Luigi Nardi, Frank Hutter
NeurIPS5
2022 JAHS-Bench-201: A Foundation For Research On Joint Architecture And Hyperparameter Search
abstract
The past few years have seen the development of many benchmarks for Neural Architecture Search (NAS), fueling rapid progress in NAS research. However, recent work, which shows that good hyperparameter settings can be more important than using the best architecture, calls for a shift in focus towards Joint Architecture and Hyperparameter Search (JAHS). Therefore, we present JAHS-Bench-201, the first collection of surrogate benchmarks for JAHS, built to also facilitate research on multi-objective, cost-aware and (multi) multi-fidelity optimization algorithms. To the best of our knowledge, JAHS-Bench-201 is based on the most extensive dataset of neural network performance data in the public domain. It is composed of approximately 161 million data points and 20 performance metrics for three deep learning tasks, while featuring a 14-dimensional search and fidelity space that extends the popular NAS-Bench-201 space. With JAHS-Bench-201, we hope to democratize research on JAHS and lower the barrier to entry of an extremely compute intensive field, e.g., by reducing the compute time to run a JAHS algorithm from 5 days to only a few seconds.
Archit Bansal, Danny Stoll, Maciej Janowski, Arber Zela, Frank Hutter
NeurIPS3