We study almost envy-freeness in house allocation, where m houses are to be allocated among n agents so that every agent receives exactly one house. An envy-free allocation need not exist, and therefore we may have to settle for relaxations. We study different aggregate measures of envy as markers of fairness. In particular, we define the amount of envy experienced by an agent a w.r.t. an allocation to be the number of agents that agent a envies under that allocation. We quantify the envy generated by an allocation using three different metrics: 1) the number of agents who are envious; 2) the maximum amount of envy experienced by any agent; and 3) the total amount of envy experienced by all agents, and look for allocations that minimize one of the three metrics. We prove a host of algorithmic and hardness results. We also suggest practical approaches for these problems via integer linear program (ILP) formulations and report the findings of our experimental evaluation of ILPs. Finally, we study the price of fairness, which quantifies the loss of welfare we must suffer due to the fairness requirements, and present tight bounds as well as algorithms that simultaneously optimize both welfare and fairness.

A graph G is c-closed if every two vertices with at least c common neighbors are adjacent to each other. This definition is an abstraction of the triadic closure property exhibited by many real-world social networks, namely, friends of friends tend to be friends themselves. Social networks, however, are often temporal rather than static---the connections change over a period of time. And hence temporal graphs, rather than static graphs, are often better suited to model social networks. Motivated by this, we introduce a definition of temporal c-closed graphs, in which if two vertices u and v have at least c common neighbors during a short interval of time, then u and v are adjacent to each other around that time. Our pilot experiments show that several real-world temporal networks are c-closed for rather small values of c. We also study the computational problems of enumerating maximal cliques and other dense subgraphs in temporal c-closed graphs. A clique in a temporal graph is a subgraph that lasts for a certain period of time, during which every possible edge in the subgraph becomes active often enough; other dense subgraphs are defined similarly. We bound the number of such maximal dense subgraphs in a temporal c-closed graph that evolves slowly, and thus show that the corresponding enumeration problems admit efficient algorithms; by slow evolution, we mean that between consecutive time-steps, the local change in adjacencies remains small. Our work also adds to a growing body of literature on defining suitable structural parameters for temporal graphs that can be leveraged to design efficient algorithms.

We study almost envy-freeness in house allocation, where m houses are to be allocated among n agents so that every agent receives exactly one house. An envy-free allocation need not exist, and therefore we may have to settle for relaxations. We study different aggregate measures of envy as markers of fairness. In particular, we define the amount of envy experienced by an agent a w.r.t. an allocation to be the number of agents that agent a envies under that allocation. We quantify the envy generated by an allocation using three different metrics: 1) the number of agents who are envious; 2) the maximum amount of envy experienced by any agent; and 3) the total amount of envy experienced by all agents, and look for allocations that minimize one of the three metrics. We prove a host of algorithmic and hardness results. We also suggest practical approaches for these problems via integer linear program (ILP) formulations and report the findings of our experimental evaluation of ILPs. Finally, we study the price of fairness, which quantifies the loss of welfare we must suffer due to the fairness requirements, and present tight bounds as well as algorithms that simultaneously optimize both welfare and fairness.

We study the computational complexity of fair division of indivisible items in an enriched model: there is an underlying graph on the set of items. And we have to allocate the items (i.e., the vertices of the graph) to a set of agents in such a way that (a) the allocation is fair (for appropriate notions of fairness) and (b) each agent receives a bundle of items (i.e., a subset of vertices) that induces a subgraph with a specific ``nice structure.'' This model has previously been studied in the literature with the nice structure being a connected subgraph. In this paper, we propose an alternative for connectivity in fair division. We introduce compact graphs, and look for fair allocations in which each agent receives a compact bundle of items. Through compactness, we attempt to capture the idea that every agent must receive a bundle of ``closely related'' items. We prove a host of hardness and tractability results with respect to fairness concepts such as proportionality, envy-freeness and maximin share guarantee.

Abstract. For a positive integer [Formula: see text], a graph [Formula: see text] is said to be [Formula: see text]-closed if every pair of nonadjacent vertices in [Formula: see text] have at most [Formula: see text] neighbors in common. The closure of a graph [Formula: see text], denoted by [Formula: see text], is the least positive integer [Formula: see text] for which [Formula: see text] is [Formula: see text]-closed. The class of [Formula: see text]-closed graphs was introduced by J. Fox, T. Roughgarden, C. Seshadhri, F. Wei, and N. Wein [Proceedings of the International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (2018), 55; SIAM J. Comput., 49 (2020), pp. 448–464]. T. Koana, C. Komusiewicz, and F. Sommer [Proceedings of the European Symposium on Algorithms (2020), 65; SIAM J. Discrete Math., 36 (2022), pp. 2798–2821] started the study of using [Formula: see text] as an additional structural parameter to design kernels for problems that are W -hard under standard parameterizations. In particular, they studied problems such as Independent Set, Induced Matching, Irredundant Set, and (Threshold) Dominating Set and showed that each of these problems admits a polynomial kernel when parameterized either by [Formula: see text] or by [Formula: see text] for each fixed value of [Formula: see text]. Here, [Formula: see text] is the solution size and [Formula: see text]. The work of Koana et al. left several questions open, one of which was whether the Perfect Code problem admits a fixed-parameter tractable ( FPT ) algorithm and a polynomial kernel on [Formula: see text]-closed graphs. In this paper, among other results, we answer this question in the affirmative. Inspired by the FPT algorithm for Perfect Code, we further explore two more domination problems on the graphs of bounded closure. The other problems that we study are Connected Dominating Set and Partial Dominating Set. We show that Perfect Code and Connected Dominating Set are fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by [Formula: see text], whereas Partial Dominating Set, parameterized by [Formula: see text] is [Formula: see text]-hard even when [Formula: see text]. We also show that for each fixed [Formula: see text], Perfect Code admits a polynomial kernel on the class of [Formula: see text]-closed graphs. And we observe that Connected Dominating Set has no polynomial kernel even on 2-closed graphs unless NP [Formula: see text] co- NP /poly.

Finding large cliques or cliques missing a few edges is a fundamental algorithmic task in the study of real-world graphs, with applications in community detection, pattern recognition, and clustering. A number of effective backtracking-based heuristics for these problems have emerged from recent empirical work in social network analysis. Given the NP-hardness of variants of clique counting, these results raise a challenge for beyond worst-case analysis of these problems. Inspired by the triadic closure of real-world graphs, Fox et al. (SICOMP 2020) introduced the notion of $c$-closed graphs and proved that maximal clique enumeration is fixed-parameter tractable with respect to $c$. In practice, due to noise in data, one wishes to actually discover "near-cliques", which can be characterized as cliques with a sparse subgraph removed. In this work, we prove that many different kinds of maximal near-cliques can be enumerated in polynomial time (and FPT in $c$) for $c$-closed graphs. We study various established notions of such substructures, including $k$-plexes, complements of bounded-degeneracy and bounded-treewidth graphs. Interestingly, our algorithms follow relatively simple backtracking procedures, analogous to what is done in practice. Our results underscore the significance of the $c$-closed graph class for theoretical understanding of social network analysis.

We study a prototype Crossing Minimization problem, defined as follows. Let F be an infinite family of (possibly vertex-labeled) graphs. Then, given a set P of (possibly labeled) n points in the Euclidean plane, a collection L subseteq Lines(P)={l: l is a line segment with both endpoints in P}, and a non-negative integer k, decide if there is a subcollection L'subseteq L such that the graph G=(P,L') is isomorphic to a graph in F and L' has at most k crossings. By G=(P,L'), we refer to the graph on vertex set P, where two vertices are adjacent if and only if there is a line segment that connects them in L'. Intuitively, in Crossing Minimization, we have a set of locations of interest, and we want to build/draw/exhibit connections between them (where L indicates where it is feasible to have these connections) so that we obtain a structure in F. Natural choices for F are the collections of perfect matchings, Hamiltonian paths, and graphs that contain an (s,t)-path (a path whose endpoints are labeled). While the objective of seeking a solution with few crossings is of interest from a theoretical point of view, it is also well motivated by a wide range of practical considerations. For example, links/roads (such as highways) may be cheaper to build and faster to traverse, and signals/moving objects would collide/interrupt each other less often. Further, graphs with fewer crossings are preferred for graphic user interfaces. As a starting point for a systematic study, we consider a special case of Crossing Minimization. Already for this case, we obtain NP-hardness and W[1]-hardness results, and ETH-based lower bounds. Specifically, suppose that the input also contains a collection D of d non-crossing line segments such that each point in P belongs to exactly one line in D, and L does not contain line segments between points on the same line in D. Clearly, Crossing Minimization is the case where d=n - then, P is in general position. The case of d=2 is of interest not only because it is the most restricted non-trivial case, but also since it corresponds to a class of graphs that has been well studied - specifically, it is Crossing Minimization where G=(P,L) is a (bipartite) graph with a so called two-layer drawing. For d=2, we consider three basic choices of F. For perfect matchings, we show (i) NP-hardness with an ETH-based lower bound, (ii) solvability in subexponential parameterized time, and (iii) existence of an O(k^2)-vertex kernel. Second, for Hamiltonian paths, we show (i) solvability in subexponential parameterized time, and (ii) existence of an O(k^2)-vertex kernel. Lastly, for graphs that contain an (s,t)-path, we show (i) NP-hardness and W[1]-hardness, and (ii) membership in XP.