Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Daniel Jaroslawicz
dblp:219/8727
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Information extraction and text analysis · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › drug discovery › target identification
drug target identification |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Retrieve to Explain: Evidence-driven Predictions for Explainable Drug Target Identification · ACL (1) 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › computational genomics
disease gene identification |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | PGA: post-GWAS analysis for disease gene identification · Bioinform. 2018 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › computational genomics
gene prioritization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | PGA: post-GWAS analysis for disease gene identification · Bioinform. 2018 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics
post-GWAS analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | PGA: post-GWAS analysis for disease gene identification · Bioinform. 2018 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
genome-wide association study |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | PGA: post-GWAS analysis for disease gene identification · Bioinform. 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
retrieval-augmented prediction · 1.7ontology scoring · 0.3gene network scoring · 0.3eQTL data integration · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Retrieve to Explain: Evidence-driven Predictions for Explainable Drug Target IdentificationabstractRavi Patel, Angus Brayne, Rogier Hintzen, Daniel Jaroslawicz, Georgiana Neculae, Dane S. Corneil. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025. Angus Brayne, Rogier Hintzen, Daniel Jaroslawicz, Georgiana Neculae, Dane S. Corneil |
ACL (1) | 4 |
| 2021 | Gage MPC: Bypassing Residual Function Leakage for Non-Interactive MPCabstractExisting models for non-interactive MPC cannot provide full privacy for inputs, because they inherently leak the residual function (i.e., the output of the function on the honest parties’ input together with all possible values of the adversarial inputs). For example, in any non-interactive sealed-bid auction, the last bidder can figure out what was the highest previous bid. We present a new MPC model which avoids this privacy leak. To achieve this, we utilize a blockchain in a novel way, incorporating smart contracts and arbitrary parties that can be incentivized to perform computation (“bounty hunters,” akin to miners). Security is maintained under a monetary assumption about the parties: an honest party can temporarily supply a recoverable collateral of value higher than the computational cost an adversary can expend. We thus construct non-interactive MPC protocols with strong security guarantees (full security, no residual leakage) in the short term. Over time, as the adversary can invest more and more computational resources, the security guarantee decays. Thus, our model, which we call Gage MPC, is suitable for secure computation with limited-time secrecy, such as auctions. A key ingredient in our protocols is a primitive we call “Gage Time Capsules” (GaTC): a time capsule that allows a party to commit to a value that others are able to reveal but only at a designated computational cost. A GaTC allows a party to commit to a value together with a monetary collateral. If the original party properly opens the GaTC, it can recover the collateral. Otherwise, the collateral is used to incentivize bounty hunters to open the GaTC. This primitive is used to ensure completion of Gage MPC protocols on the desired inputs. As a requisite tool (of independent interest), we present a generalization of garbled circuit that are more robust: they can tolerate exposure of extra input labels. This is in contrast to Yao’s garbled circuits, whose secrecy breaks down if even a single extra label is exposed. Finally, we present a proof-of-concept implementation of a special case of our construction, yielding an auction functionality over an Ethereum-like blockchain. Ghada A. Al-Mashaqbeh, Fabrice Benhamouda, Seungwook Han, Daniel Jaroslawicz, Tal Malkin, Alex Nicita, Tal Rabin, Abhishek Shah, Eran Tromer |
Proc. Priv. Enhancing Technol. | 4 |
| 2018 | PGA: post-GWAS analysis for disease gene identificationabstractSummary: Although the genome-wide association study (GWAS) is a powerful method to identify disease-associated variants, it does not directly address the biological mechanisms underlying such genetic association signals. Here, we present PGA, a Perl- and Java-based program for post-GWAS analysis that predicts likely disease genes given a list of GWAS-reported variants. Designed with a command line interface, PGA incorporates genomic and eQTL data in identifying disease gene candidates and uses gene network and ontology data to score them based upon the strength of their relationship to the disease in question. Availability and implementation: http://zdzlab.einstein.yu.edu/1/pga.html. Contact: [email protected]. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Jhih-rong Lin, Daniel Jaroslawicz, Quanwei Zhang, Zhengdong D. Zhang |
Bioinform. | 2 |