DNA-methylation alterations are common in cancer and display unique characteristics that make them ideal markers for tumor quantification and classification. Here we present MIMESIS, a computational framework exploiting minimal DNA-methylation signatures composed by a few dozen informative DNA-methylation sites to quantify and classify tumor signals in tissue and cell-free DNA samples. Extensive analyses of multiple independent and heterogenous datasets including >7200 samples demonstrate the capability of MIMESIS to provide precise estimations of tumor content and to enable accurate classification of tumor type and molecular subtype. To assess our framework for clinical applications, we designed a MIMESIS-informed assay incorporating the minimal signatures for breast cancer. Using both artificial samples and clinical serial cell-free DNA samples from patients with metastatic breast cancer, we show that our approach provides accurate estimations of tumor content, sensitive detection of tumor signal and the ability to capture clinically relevant molecular subtype in patients' circulation. This study provides evidence that our extremely parsimonious approach can be used to develop cost-effective and highly scalable DNA-methylation assays that could support and facilitate the implementation of precision oncology in clinical practice.

Motivation: Controlling for tumor purity in molecular analyses is essential to allow for reliable genomic aberration calls, for inter-sample comparison and to monitor heterogeneity of cancer cell populations. In genome wide screening studies, the assessment of tumor purity is typically performed by means of computational methods that exploit somatic copy number aberrations. Results: We present a strategy, called Purity Assessment from clonal MEthylation Sites (PAMES), which uses the methylation level of a few dozen, highly clonal, tumor type specific CpG sites to estimate the purity of tumor samples, without the need of a matched benign control. We trained and validated our method in more than 6000 samples from different datasets. Purity estimates by PAMES were highly concordant with other state-of-the-art tools and its evaluation in a cancer cell line dataset highlights its reliability to accurately estimate tumor admixtures. We extended the capability of PAMES to the analysis of CpG islands instead of the more platform-specific CpG sites and demonstrated its accuracy in a set of advanced tumors profiled by high throughput DNA methylation sequencing. These analyses show that PAMES is a valuable tool to assess the purity of tumor samples in the settings of clinical research and diagnostics. Availability and implementation: https://github.com/cgplab/PAMES. Contact: [email protected] or [email protected]. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.