Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Piyushi Manupriya

dblp:219/9847 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 4 first-author · 4 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 60% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 20% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 20%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Machine learning and data management · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning and data management
optimal transport
0.812024
Submodular framework for structured-sparse optimal transport · ICML 2024
Mathematical optimization
discrete optimization
0.812024
Submodular framework for structured-sparse optimal transport · ICML 2024
Mathematical optimization › sparse optimization
sparsity-constrained optimization
0.812024
Submodular framework for structured-sparse optimal transport · ICML 2024
Mathematical optimization › submodular optimization
submodular maximization
0.812024
Submodular framework for structured-sparse optimal transport · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › causal machine learning
causal attribution
0.412019
Neural Network Attributions: A Causal Perspective · ICML 2019
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
causality
0.412019
Neural Network Attributions: A Causal Perspective · ICML 2019
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › attribution methods
feature attribution
0.412019
Neural Network Attributions: A Causal Perspective · ICML 2019
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.412019
Neural Network Attributions: A Causal Perspective · ICML 2019
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference › causal model
structural causal model
0.412019
Neural Network Attributions: A Causal Perspective · ICML 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

lagrangian duality · 1.5greedy algorithm · 1.5structural causal model · 0.4causal inference · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Multi-agent Multi-armed Bandits with Minimum Reward Guarantee Fairness
Piyushi Manupriya, Himanshu, Saketha Nath Jagarlapudi, Ganesh Ghalme
AAMAS1
2024 Consistent Optimal Transport with Empirical Conditional Measures
abstract
Given samples from two joint distributions, we consider the problem of Optimal Transportation (OT) between them when conditioned on a common variable. We focus on the general setting where the conditioned variable may be continuous, and the marginals of this variable in the two joint distributions may not be the same. In such settings, standard OT variants cannot be employed, and novel estimation techniques are necessary. Since the main challenge is that the conditional distributions are not explicitly available, the key idea in our OT formulation is to employ kernelized-least-squares terms computed over the joint samples, which implicitly match the transport plan’s marginals with the empirical conditionals. Under mild conditions, we prove that our estimated transport plans, as a function of the conditioned variable, are asymptotically optimal. For finite samples, we show that the deviation in terms of our regularized objective is bounded by $O(m^{-1/4})$, where $m$ is the number of samples. We also discuss how the conditional transport plan could be modelled using explicit probabilistic models as well as using implicit generative ones. We empirically verify the consistency of our estimator on synthetic datasets, where the optimal plan is analytically known. When employed in applications like prompt learning for few-shot classification and conditional-generation in the context of predicting cell responses to treatment, our methodology improves upon state-of-the-art methods.
Piyushi Manupriya, Rachit Keerti Das, Sayantan Biswas, Saketha Nath Jagarlapudi
AISTATS1
2024 Submodular framework for structured-sparse optimal transport
abstract
Unbalanced optimal transport (UOT) has recently gained much attention due to its flexible framework for handling un-normalized measures and its robustness properties. In this work, we explore learning (structured) sparse transport plans in the UOT setting, i.e., transport plans have an upper bound on the number of non-sparse entries in each column (structured sparse pattern) or in the whole plan (general sparse pattern). We propose novel sparsity-constrained UOT formulations building on the recently explored maximum mean discrepancy based UOT. We show that the proposed optimization problem is equivalent to the maximization of a weakly submodular function over a uniform matroid or a partition matroid. We develop efficient gradient-based discrete greedy algorithms and provide the corresponding theoretical guarantees. Empirically, we observe that our proposed greedy algorithms select a diverse support set and we illustrate the efficacy of the proposed approach in various applications.
Piyushi Manupriya, Pratik Jawanpuria, Karthik S. Gurumoorthy, Saketha Nath Jagarlapudi, Bamdev Mishra
ICML1
2022 Improving Attribution Methods by Learning Submodular Functions
abstract
This work explores the novel idea of learning a submodular scoring function to improve the specificity/selectivity of existing feature attribution methods. Submodular scores are natural for attribution as they are known to accurately model the principle of diminishing returns. A new formulation for learning a deep submodular set function that is consistent with the real-valued attribution maps obtained by existing attribution methods is proposed. The final attribution value of a feature is then defined as the marginal gain in the induced submodular score of the feature in the context of other highly attributed features, thus decreasing the attribution of redundant yet discriminatory features. Experiments on multiple datasets illustrate that the proposed attribution method achieves higher specificity along with good discriminative power. The implementation of our method is publicly available at https://github.com/Piyushi-0/SEA-NN.
Piyushi Manupriya, Tarun Ram Menta, Saketha Nath Jagarlapudi, Vineeth N. Balasubramanian
AISTATS1
2019 Neural Network Attributions: A Causal Perspective
abstract
We propose a new attribution method for neural networks developed using first principles of causality (to the best of our knowledge, the first such). The neural network architecture is viewed as a Structural Causal Model, and a methodology to compute the causal effect of each feature on the output is presented. With reasonable assumptions on the causal structure of the input data, we propose algorithms to efficiently compute the causal effects, as well as scale the approach to data with large dimensionality. We also show how this method can be used for recurrent neural networks. We report experimental results on both simulated and real datasets showcasing the promise and usefulness of the proposed algorithm.
Aditya Chattopadhyay, Piyushi Manupriya, Anirban Sarkar 0001, Vineeth N. Balasubramanian
ICML2