Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Piyushi Manupriya
dblp:219/9847
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 4 first-author · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 60% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 20% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 20% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Machine learning and data management · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning and data management
optimal transport |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Submodular framework for structured-sparse optimal transport · ICML 2024 |
Mathematical optimization
discrete optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Submodular framework for structured-sparse optimal transport · ICML 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › sparse optimization
sparsity-constrained optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Submodular framework for structured-sparse optimal transport · ICML 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › submodular optimization
submodular maximization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Submodular framework for structured-sparse optimal transport · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › causal machine learning
causal attribution |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Neural Network Attributions: A Causal Perspective · ICML 2019 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
causality |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Neural Network Attributions: A Causal Perspective · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › attribution methods
feature attribution |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Neural Network Attributions: A Causal Perspective · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Neural Network Attributions: A Causal Perspective · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference › causal model
structural causal model |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Neural Network Attributions: A Causal Perspective · ICML 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
lagrangian duality · 1.5greedy algorithm · 1.5structural causal model · 0.4causal inference · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Multi-agent Multi-armed Bandits with Minimum Reward Guarantee Fairness
Piyushi Manupriya, Himanshu, Saketha Nath Jagarlapudi, Ganesh Ghalme |
AAMAS | 1 |
| 2024 | Consistent Optimal Transport with Empirical Conditional MeasuresabstractGiven samples from two joint distributions, we consider the problem of Optimal Transportation (OT) between them when conditioned on a common variable. We focus on the general setting where the conditioned variable may be continuous, and the marginals of this variable in the two joint distributions may not be the same. In such settings, standard OT variants cannot be employed, and novel estimation techniques are necessary. Since the main challenge is that the conditional distributions are not explicitly available, the key idea in our OT formulation is to employ kernelized-least-squares terms computed over the joint samples, which implicitly match the transport plan’s marginals with the empirical conditionals. Under mild conditions, we prove that our estimated transport plans, as a function of the conditioned variable, are asymptotically optimal. For finite samples, we show that the deviation in terms of our regularized objective is bounded by $O(m^{-1/4})$, where $m$ is the number of samples. We also discuss how the conditional transport plan could be modelled using explicit probabilistic models as well as using implicit generative ones. We empirically verify the consistency of our estimator on synthetic datasets, where the optimal plan is analytically known. When employed in applications like prompt learning for few-shot classification and conditional-generation in the context of predicting cell responses to treatment, our methodology improves upon state-of-the-art methods. Piyushi Manupriya, Rachit Keerti Das, Sayantan Biswas, Saketha Nath Jagarlapudi |
AISTATS | 1 |
| 2024 | Submodular framework for structured-sparse optimal transportabstractUnbalanced optimal transport (UOT) has recently gained much attention due to its flexible framework for handling un-normalized measures and its robustness properties. In this work, we explore learning (structured) sparse transport plans in the UOT setting, i.e., transport plans have an upper bound on the number of non-sparse entries in each column (structured sparse pattern) or in the whole plan (general sparse pattern). We propose novel sparsity-constrained UOT formulations building on the recently explored maximum mean discrepancy based UOT. We show that the proposed optimization problem is equivalent to the maximization of a weakly submodular function over a uniform matroid or a partition matroid. We develop efficient gradient-based discrete greedy algorithms and provide the corresponding theoretical guarantees. Empirically, we observe that our proposed greedy algorithms select a diverse support set and we illustrate the efficacy of the proposed approach in various applications. Piyushi Manupriya, Pratik Jawanpuria, Karthik S. Gurumoorthy, Saketha Nath Jagarlapudi, Bamdev Mishra |
ICML | 1 |
| 2022 | Improving Attribution Methods by Learning Submodular FunctionsabstractThis work explores the novel idea of learning a submodular scoring function to improve the specificity/selectivity of existing feature attribution methods. Submodular scores are natural for attribution as they are known to accurately model the principle of diminishing returns. A new formulation for learning a deep submodular set function that is consistent with the real-valued attribution maps obtained by existing attribution methods is proposed. The final attribution value of a feature is then defined as the marginal gain in the induced submodular score of the feature in the context of other highly attributed features, thus decreasing the attribution of redundant yet discriminatory features. Experiments on multiple datasets illustrate that the proposed attribution method achieves higher specificity along with good discriminative power. The implementation of our method is publicly available at https://github.com/Piyushi-0/SEA-NN. Piyushi Manupriya, Tarun Ram Menta, Saketha Nath Jagarlapudi, Vineeth N. Balasubramanian |
AISTATS | 1 |
| 2019 | Neural Network Attributions: A Causal PerspectiveabstractWe propose a new attribution method for neural networks developed using first principles of causality (to the best of our knowledge, the first such). The neural network architecture is viewed as a Structural Causal Model, and a methodology to compute the causal effect of each feature on the output is presented. With reasonable assumptions on the causal structure of the input data, we propose algorithms to efficiently compute the causal effects, as well as scale the approach to data with large dimensionality. We also show how this method can be used for recurrent neural networks. We report experimental results on both simulated and real datasets showcasing the promise and usefulness of the proposed algorithm. Aditya Chattopadhyay, Piyushi Manupriya, Anirban Sarkar 0001, Vineeth N. Balasubramanian |
ICML | 2 |