Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Fumiko Fujiwara

dblp:22/1157 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1998
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Empirical software engineering › software size measurement
function point analysis
0.011998
Examples of Applying Software Estimate Tool · ICSE 1998
Empirical software engineering
software effort estimation
0.011998
Examples of Applying Software Estimate Tool · ICSE 1998

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

function point analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1998 Examples of Applying Software Estimate Tool
abstract
Although estimating the cost of a software project and the effort involved is very important, improving accuracy and establishing the software as a technology are both difficult. To solve these problems we have tried to use a software estimating tool. This tool has two characteristics. The first is that the tool uses function point analysis (FPA) instead of source lines of code, and the second is that special factors present in software development (usually estimated only from experience) are considered. This report provides some examples of how software project effort estimates can be improved.
Fumiko Fujiwara, Takushi Goto, Sadao Araki
ICSE1