Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Pamela K. Schraedley

dblp:22/1745 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2002
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Usability and user experience research · 74% Interaction techniques and input · 26%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visualization and visual analytics · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › information seeking
information scent
0.012001
Information scent as a driver of Web behavior graphs: results of a protocol analysis method for Web usability · CHI 2001
Information retrieval › user behavior
search behavior
0.012001
Information scent as a driver of Web behavior graphs: results of a protocol analysis method for Web usability · CHI 2001
Usability and user experience research › usability engineering
web usability
0.012001
Information scent as a driver of Web behavior graphs: results of a protocol analysis method for Web usability · CHI 2001
Interaction techniques and input › spatial interaction › navigation
pan and zoom interaction
0.012002
Keeping things in context: a comparative evaluation of focus plus context screens, overviews, and zooming · CHI 2002

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

interviews · 0.1comparative evaluation · 0.1talk-aloud protocols · 0.1protocol analysis · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2002 Keeping things in context: a comparative evaluation of focus plus context screens, overviews, and zooming
abstract
Users working with documents that are too large and detailed to fit on the user's screen (e.g. chip designs) have the choice between zooming or applying appropriate visualization techniques. In this paper, we present a comparison of three such techniques. The first, focus plus context screens, are wall-size low-resolution displays with an embedded high-resolution display region. This technique is compared with overview plus detail and zooming/panning. We interviewed fourteen visual surveillance and design professionals from different areas (graphic design, chip design, air traffic control, etc.) in order to create a repre sentative sample of tasks to be used in two experimental comparison studies. In the first experiment, subjects using focus plus context screens to extract information from large static documents completed the two experimental tasks on average 21% and 36% faster than when they used the other interfaces. In the second experiment, focus plus context screens allowed subjects to reduce their error rate in a driving simulation to less than one third of the error rate of the competing overview plus detail setup
Patrick Baudisch, Nathaniel Good, Victoria Bellotti, Pamela K. Schraedley
CHI4
2001 Information scent as a driver of Web behavior graphs: results of a protocol analysis method for Web usability
abstract
The purpose of this paper is to introduce a replicable WWW protocol analysis methodology illustrated by application to data collected in the laboratory. The methodology uses instrumentation to obtain detailed recordings of user actions with a browser, caches Web pages encoutered, and videotapes talk-aloud protocols. We apply the current form of the method to the analysis of eight Web protocols, visualizing the structure of the interaction and showing the strong effect of information scent in determining the path followed.
Stuart K. Card, Peter Pirolli, Mija M. Van Der Wege, Julie Bauer Morrison, Robert W. Reeder, Pamela K. Schraedley, Jenea Boshart
CHI6