Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

S. Schmitz

dblp:22/2270 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1992
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
sequence analysis
0.011992
A new approach for displaying identities and differences among aligned amino acid sequences · Comput. Appl. Biosci. 1992
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequence comparison
sequence conservation analysis
0.011992
A new approach for displaying identities and differences among aligned amino acid sequences · Comput. Appl. Biosci. 1992
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein sequence analysis
0.011992
A new approach for displaying identities and differences among aligned amino acid sequences · Comput. Appl. Biosci. 1992

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

identity calculation · 0.0divergence calculation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1992 A new approach for displaying identities and differences among aligned amino acid sequences
abstract
An algorithm is presented for computing degrees of sequence conservation found among aligned amino acid sequences. Sequence identities are calculated for each position of an alignment and average identity values of neighboring positions are figured. The average identity value of the whole alignment is chosen as a limit to discriminate between well and less conserved sequence sections. A second algorithm is given to calculate the degree of divergence of individual sequences compared to the other sequences of the alignment. The approach is easy to use on microcomputers and gives an exact picture of sequence identities and differences in order to determine, first, protein regions of high functional or structural importance among homologous proteins, and, second, significant differences of single sequences that may contribute to individual properties of the analysed protein. The method is illustrated by an example analysing a sequence alignment of higher plant nitrate reductases.
A. Friemann, S. Schmitz
Comput. Appl. Biosci.2