Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Arash Shamaei

dblp:22/2456 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 4 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip · 75% Electronic design automation · 25%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip › network topology › cayley graph
gaussian networks
0.212016
Higher Dimensional Gaussian Networks · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2016
Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip
network topology
0.212016
Higher Dimensional Gaussian Networks · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2016
Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip
routing algorithms
0.212016
Higher Dimensional Gaussian Networks · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2016
Electronic design automation › physical design › routing › message routing
shortest-path routing
0.212016
Higher Dimensional Gaussian Networks · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2016
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
approximate inference
0.112011
Mean Field Inference in Dependency Networks: An Empirical Study · AAAI 2011
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
dependency networks
0.112011
Mean Field Inference in Dependency Networks: An Empirical Study · AAAI 2011
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models
0.112011
Mean Field Inference in Dependency Networks: An Empirical Study · AAAI 2011
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference
mean-field approximation
0.112011
Mean Field Inference in Dependency Networks: An Empirical Study · AAAI 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation · 0.2graph analysis · 0.2mean field inference · 0.1gibbs sampling · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Higher dimensional Eisenstein-Jacobi networks
Zaid A. Hussain, Arash Shamaei
J. Parallel Distributed Comput.2
2016 Higher Dimensional Gaussian Networks
abstract
Gaussian interconnection networks have been introduced as a useful alternative to the classical toroidal networks, and in this paper this concept is generalized to higher dimensions. We also explore many important properties of this new topology, including distance distribution and the decomposition of higher dimensional Gaussian networks into edge-disjoint tori and Hamiltonian cycles. In addition, an optimal shortest path routing algorithm and a one-to-all broadcast algorithm for higher dimensional Gaussian networks are given. Simulation results show that the routing algorithm proposed for higher dimensional Gaussian networks outperforms the routing algorithm of the corresponding torus network of the same node-degree and the same number of nodes.
Bella Bose, Arash Shamaei, Mary Flahive
IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst.2
2011 Mean Field Inference in Dependency Networks: An Empirical Study
abstract
Dependency networks are a compelling alternative to Bayesian networks for learning joint probability distributions from data and using them to compute probabilities. A dependency network consists of a set of conditional probability distributions, each representing the probability of a single variable given its Markov blanket. Running Gibbs sampling with these conditional distributions produces a joint distribution that can be used to answer queries, but suffers from the traditional slowness of sampling-based inference. In this paper, we observe that the mean field update equation can be applied to dependency networks, even though the conditional probability distributions may be inconsistent with each other. In experiments with learning and inference on 12 datasets, we demonstrate that mean field inference in dependency networks offers similar accuracy to Gibbs sampling but with orders of magnitude improvements in speed. Compared to Bayesian networks learned on the same data, dependency networks offer higher accuracy at greater amounts of evidence. Furthermore, mean field inference is consistently more accurate in dependency networks than in Bayesian networks learned on the same data.
Daniel Lowd, Arash Shamaei
AAAI2
2008 A Simple and Efficient Fault-Tolerant Adaptive Routing Algorithm for Meshes
Arash Shamaei, Abbas Nayebi, Hamid Sarbazi-Azad
ICA3PP1
2008 An Adaptive and Fault-Tolerant Routing Algorithm for Meshes
Arash Shamaei, Hamid Sarbazi-Azad
ICCSA (1)1
2007 Improving a Fault-Tolerant Routing Algorithm Using Detailed Traffic Analysis
Abbas Nayebi, Arash Shamaei, Hamid Sarbazi-Azad
HPCC2