Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Serge Koscielny

dblp:22/2633 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
differential expression analysis
0.112005
False discovery rate, sensitivity and sample size for microarray studies · Bioinform. 2005
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis
0.112005
False discovery rate, sensitivity and sample size for microarray studies · Bioinform. 2005
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
microarray
0.012005
False discovery rate, sensitivity and sample size for microarray studies · Bioinform. 2005
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biostatistics
sample size determination
0.012005
False discovery rate, sensitivity and sample size for microarray studies · Bioinform. 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sensitivity analysis · 0.1mixture model · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2005 False discovery rate, sensitivity and sample size for microarray studies
abstract
MOTIVATION: In microarray data studies most researchers are keenly aware of the potentially high rate of false positives and the need to control it. One key statistical shift is the move away from the well-known P-value to false discovery rate (FDR). Less discussion perhaps has been spent on the sensitivity or the associated false negative rate (FNR). The purpose of this paper is to explain in simple ways why the shift from P-value to FDR for statistical assessment of microarray data is necessary, to elucidate the determining factors of FDR and, for a two-sample comparative study, to discuss its control via sample size at the design stage. RESULTS: We use a mixture model, involving differentially expressed (DE) and non-DE genes, that captures the most common problem of finding DE genes. Factors determining FDR are (1) the proportion of truly differentially expressed genes, (2) the distribution of the true differences, (3) measurement variability and (4) sample size. Many current small microarray studies are plagued with large FDR, but controlling FDR alone can lead to unacceptably large FNR. In evaluating a design of a microarray study, sensitivity or FNR curves should be computed routinely together with FDR curves. Under certain assumptions, the FDR and FNR curves coincide, thus simplifying the choice of sample size for controlling the FDR and FNR jointly.
Yudi Pawitan, Stefan Michiels, Serge Koscielny, Arief Gusnanto, Alexander Ploner
Bioinform.3