Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

M. Ramze Rezaee

dblp:22/3119 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2000
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Image and video processing · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Image and video processing › image segmentation › clustering-based segmentation
fuzzy clustering segmentation
0.012000
A multiresolution image segmentation technique based on pyramidal segmentation and fuzzy clustering · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2000
Image and video processing
image segmentation
0.012000
A multiresolution image segmentation technique based on pyramidal segmentation and fuzzy clustering · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2000
Image and video processing › image segmentation › hierarchical segmentation
multiresolution segmentation
0.012000
A multiresolution image segmentation technique based on pyramidal segmentation and fuzzy clustering · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2000
Medical and health informatics
cardiac image analysis
0.012000
A multiresolution image segmentation technique based on pyramidal segmentation and fuzzy clustering · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2000

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

pyramidal segmentation · 0.1fuzzy c-means clustering · 0.1cluster validity functional · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2000 A multiresolution image segmentation technique based on pyramidal segmentation and fuzzy clustering
abstract
In this paper, an unsupervised image segmentation technique is presented, which combines pyramidal image segmentation with the fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm. Each layer of the pyramid is split into a number of regions by a root labeling technique, and then fuzzy c-means is used to merge the regions of the layer with the highest image resolution. A cluster validity functional is used to find the optimal number of objects automatically. Segmentation of a number of synthetic as well as clinical images is illustrated and two fully automatic segmentation approaches are evaluated, which determine the left ventricular volume (LV) in 140 cardiovascular magnetic resonance (MR) images. First fuzzy c-means is applied without pyramids. In the second approach the regions generated by pyramidal segmentation are merged by fuzzy c-means. The correlation coefficients of manually and automatically defined LV lumen of all 140 and 20 end-diastolic images were equal to 0.86 and 0.79, respectively, when images were segmented with fuzzy c-means alone. These coefficients increased to 0.90 and 0.93 when the pyramidal segmentation was combined with fuzzy c-means. This method can be applied to any dimensional representation and at any resolution level of an image series. The evaluation study shows good performance in detecting LV lumen in MR images.
M. Ramze Rezaee, Pieter M. J. van der Zwet, Boudewijn P. F. Lelieveldt, Rob J. van der Geest, Johan H. C. Reiber
IEEE Trans. Image Process.1
1999 Fuzzy feature selection
M. Ramze Rezaee, Bob Goedhart, Boudewijn P. F. Lelieveldt, Johan H. C. Reiber
Pattern Recognit.1
1999 Anatomical Model Matching With Fuzzy Implicit Surfaces for Segmentation of Thoracic Volume Scans
abstract
Many segmentation methods for thoracic volume data require manual input in the form of a seed point, initial contour, volume of interest etc. The aim of the work presented here is to further automate this segmentation initialization step. In this paper an anatomical modeling and matching method is proposed to coarsely segment thoracic volume data into anatomically labeled regions. An anatomical model of the thorax is constructed in two steps: 1) individual organs are modeled with blended fuzzy implicit surfaces and 2) the single organ models are grouped into a tree structure with a solid modeling technique named constructive solid geometry (CSG). The combination of CSG with fuzzy implicit surfaces allows a hierarchical scene description by means of a boundary model, which characterizes the scene volume as a boundary potential function. From this boundary potential, an energy function is defined which is minimal when the model is registered to the tissue-air transitions in thoracic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data. This allows automatic registration in three steps: feature detection, initial positioning and energy minimization. The model matching has been validated in phantom simulations and on 15 clinical thoracic volume scans from different subjects. In 13 of these sets the matching method accurately partitioned the image volumes into a set of volumes of interest for the heart, lungs, cardiac ventricles, and thorax outlines. The method is applicable to segmentation of various types of thoracic MR-images, provided that a large part of the thorax is contained in the image volume.
Boudewijn P. F. Lelieveldt, Rob J. van der Geest, M. Ramze Rezaee, Johan G. Bosch, Johan H. C. Reiber
IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging3
1998 A new cluster validity index for the fuzzy c-mean
M. Ramze Rezaee, Boudewijn P. F. Lelieveldt, Johan H. C. Reiber
Pattern Recognit. Lett.1