Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Young-Ho Eom

dblp:22/3233 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
0000-0002-4828-7333ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Data mining · 52% Transaction processing and concurrency control · 26% Web and social media mining · 22%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining › structured data mining › graph mining
community detection
0.112009
Mining communities in networks: a solution for consistency and its evaluation · Internet Measurement Conference 2009
Transaction processing and concurrency control
consistency
0.112009
Mining communities in networks: a solution for consistency and its evaluation · Internet Measurement Conference 2009
Data mining › structured data mining › graph mining › community detection
modularity maximization
0.112009
Mining communities in networks: a solution for consistency and its evaluation · Internet Measurement Conference 2009
Web and social media mining
social network analysis
0.112008
Comparison of online social relations in volume vs interaction: a case study of cyworld · Internet Measurement Conference 2008
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph clustering
community structure
0.012009
Mining communities in networks: a solution for consistency and its evaluation · Internet Measurement Conference 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

modularity optimization · 0.2case study · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2009 Mining communities in networks: a solution for consistency and its evaluation
abstract
Online social networks pose significant challenges to computer scientists, physicists, and sociologists alike, for their massive size, fast evolution, and uncharted potential for social computing. One particular problem that has interested us is community identification. Many algorithms based on various metrics have been proposed for communities in networks [18, 24], but a few algorithms scale to very large networks. Three recent community identification algorithms, namely CNM [16], Wakita [59], and Louvain [10], stand out for their scalability to a few millions of nodes. All of them use modularity as the metric of optimization. However, all three algorithms produce inconsistent communities every time the ordering of nodes to the algorithms changes.
Haewoon Kwak, Yoonchan Choi, Young-Ho Eom, Hawoong Jeong, Sue B. Moon
Internet Measurement Conference3
2008 Comparison of online social relations in volume vs interaction: a case study of cyworld
abstract
Online social networking services are among the most popular Internet services according to Alexa.com and have become a key feature in many Internet services. Users interact through various features of online social networking services: making friend relationships, sharing their photos, and writing comments. These friend relationships are expected to become a key to many other features in web services, such as recommendation engines, security measures, online search, and personalization issues. However, we have very limited knowledge on how much interaction actually takes place over friend relationships declared online. A friend relationship only marks the beginning of online interaction.
Hyunwoo Chun, Haewoon Kwak, Young-Ho Eom, Yong-Yeol Ahn, Sue B. Moon, Hawoong Jeong
Internet Measurement Conference3