Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yuwei Wang 0009
dblp:22/335-9
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-3665-6311ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 2 · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
2 papers |
Security and privacy of machine learning · 41% Cyber-physical and IoT security · 32% Network security · 14% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 74% Speech recognition and synthesis · 26% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Audio and music processing · 100% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Security and privacy of machine learning
adversarial example |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | ALIF: Low-Cost Adversarial Audio Attacks on Black-Box Speech Platforms using Linguistic Features · SP 2024 |
Network security › intrusion detection and prevention › intrusion detection
attack detection |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Indelible "Footprints" of Inaudible Command Injection · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2024 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack
audio adversarial attack |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | ALIF: Low-Cost Adversarial Audio Attacks on Black-Box Speech Platforms using Linguistic Features · SP 2024 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack
black-box attack |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | ALIF: Low-Cost Adversarial Audio Attacks on Black-Box Speech Platforms using Linguistic Features · SP 2024 |
Hardware security and side channels
hardware fingerprinting |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Indelible "Footprints" of Inaudible Command Injection · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2024 |
Cyber-physical and IoT security › voice assistant security
inaudible voice command attack |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Indelible "Footprints" of Inaudible Command Injection · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2024 |
Cyber-physical and IoT security
voice assistant security |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Indelible "Footprints" of Inaudible Command Injection · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2024 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
cross-lingual transfer |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Transferring Audio Deepfake Detection Capability across Languages · WWW 2023 |
Audio and music processing › audio security
audio deepfake detection |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Transferring Audio Deepfake Detection Capability across Languages · WWW 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis
automatic speech recognition |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | ALIF: Low-Cost Adversarial Audio Attacks on Black-Box Speech Platforms using Linguistic Features · SP 2024 |
Cyber-physical and IoT security › sensor security
ultrasound attack |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Indelible "Footprints" of Inaudible Command Injection · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
text-to-speech · 1.5embedding space perturbation · 1.5adversarial domain adaptation · 1.3spectrogram analysis · 0.8signal processing · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | ALIF: Low-Cost Adversarial Audio Attacks on Black-Box Speech Platforms using Linguistic FeaturesabstractExtensive research has revealed that adversarial examples (AE) pose a significant threat to voice-controllable smart devices. Recent studies have proposed black-box adversarial attacks that require only the final transcription from an automatic speech recognition (ASR) system. However, these attacks typically involve many queries to the ASR, resulting in substantial costs. Moreover, AE-based adversarial audio samples are susceptible to ASR updates. In this paper, we identify the root cause of these limitations, namely the inability to construct AE attack samples directly around the decision boundary of deep learning (DL) models. Building on this observation, we propose ALIF, the first black-box adversarial linguistic feature-based attack pipeline. We leverage the reciprocal process of text-to-speech (TTS) and ASR models to generate perturbations in the linguistic embedding space where the decision boundary resides. Based on the ALIF pipeline, we present the ALIF-OTL and ALIF-OTA schemes for launching attacks in both the digital domain and the physical playback environment on four commercial ASRs and voice assistants. Extensive evaluations demonstrate that ALIF-OTL and -OTA significantly improve query efficiency by 97.7% and 73.3%, respectively, while achieving competitive performance compared to existing methods. Notably, ALIF-OTL can generate an attack sample with only one query. Furthermore, our test-of-time experiment validates the robustness of our approach against ASR updates. Peng Cheng 0007, Yuwei Wang 0009, Zhongjie Ba, Xiaodong Lin 0001, Feng Lin 0004, Li Lu 0008, Kui Ren 0001 |
SP | 2 |
| 2024 | Indelible "Footprints" of Inaudible Command InjectionabstractInaudible command injection transmits inaudible ultrasounds to inject adversarial speech commands into a voice assistant, therefore manipulating voice control systems (e.g., a garage door or a security camera) for illegitimate purposes. Although the attack is inaudible, we find it does leave visible “footprints”. Such attack “footprints” are the side product due to the interaction between the attack signal (i.e., input) and the acoustic components (i.e., transfer function), so they reflect the hardware characteristics of the sound capture system, including the microphone diaphragm, the low-pass filter, and the analog-to-digital converter. Moreover, unlike the non-linearity distortion that is erasable with signal-shaping techniques, the “footprints” are indelible because they are unrelated to the content of injected commands. We discover two types of indelible “footprints” embedded in the recording spectrogram, namely abnormal interfering noise and abnormal demodulation. A software-based detection method and a portable detector, DolphinTag, are further designed to identify these “footprints”. The software-based method achieves a detection accuracy of 99.8% on the phone models exhibiting abnormal interfering noise, and our DolphinTag achieves 100% detection accuracy which detects the ultrasound attack by actively facilitating the abnormal demodulation. Zhongjie Ba, Bin Gong 0001, Yuwei Wang 0009, Peng Cheng 0007, Feng Lin 0004, Li Lu 0008, Kui Ren 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. | 3 |
| 2023 | Transferring Audio Deepfake Detection Capability across LanguagesabstractThe proliferation of deepfake content has motivated a surge of detection studies. However, existing detection methods in the audio area exclusively work in English, and there is a lack of data resources in other languages. Cross-lingual deepfake detection, a critical but rarely explored area, urges more study. This paper conducts the first comprehensive study on the cross-lingual perspective of deepfake detection. We observe that English data enriched in deepfake algorithms can teach a detector the knowledge of various spoofing artifacts, contributing to performing detection across language domains. Based on the observation, we first construct a first-of-its-kind cross-lingual evaluation dataset including heterogeneous spoofed speech uttered in the two most widely spoken languages, then explored domain adaptation (DA) techniques to transfer the artifacts detection capability and propose effective and practical DA strategies fitting the cross-lingual scenario. Our adversarial-based DA paradigm teaches the model to learn real/fake knowledge while losing language dependency. Extensive experiments over 137-hour audio clips validate the adapted models can detect fake audio generated by unseen algorithms in the new domain. Zhongjie Ba, Qing Wen, Peng Cheng 0007, Yuwei Wang 0009, Feng Lin 0004, Li Lu 0008, Zhenguang Liu |
WWW | 4 |