Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Diane S. Rohlman
dblp:22/3662 · also Diane Schertler Rohlman
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1994
0000-0002-6697-1577ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 3
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software testing · 77% Empirical software engineering · 23% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Usability and user experience research · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Usability and user experience research › usability evaluation
comparative usability study |
0.0 | 1 | 1992 | Hypertext or Book: Which is Better for Answering Questions? · CHI 1992 |
Empirical software engineering
developer studies |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | Analyses of factors related to positive test bias in software testing · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 1994 |
Information retrieval › document organization
hypertext |
0.0 | 1 | 1992 | Hypertext or Book: Which is Better for Answering Questions? · CHI 1992 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
comparative study · 0.0empirical analysis · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1994 | Analyses of factors related to positive test bias in software testing
Laura M. Leventhal, Barbee Teasley, Diane S. Rohlman |
Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. | 3 |
| 1993 | Sleuthing in HyperHolmes : aTM an evaluation of using hypertext vs. a book to answer questionsabstractAlthough hypertext offers exciting new ways of presenting and accessing information, there is little research which systematically compares the usability of hypertext against traditional media with an eye to improving the design of the hypertext. This paper presents the results of an experiment which examined the performance and navigation strategies of users engaged in a question-answering task using either a hypertext encyclopedia of Sherlock Holmes facts (the HyperHolmessyTMstem) or the traditional paper form. The results showed that, overall, the hypertext users were marginally more accurate in answering questions, and excelled at questions where the key information was embedded in a text entry. The book users were marginally faster overall, but excelled only in answering questions based on graphics. Hypertext users showed a preference for those tools which most closely mimicked use of a conventional book. They used a hierarchical structure to guide their navigation strategy in early trials, but soon learned to navigate in a non-hierarchical, flat way. Laura M. Leventhal, Barbee Teasley, Keith Instone, Diane S. Rohlman, John Farhat |
Behav. Inf. Technol. | 4 |
| 1992 | Hypertext or Book: Which is Better for Answering Questions?
Barbee T. Mynatt, Laura M. Leventhal, Keith Instone, John Farhat, Diane S. Rohlman |
CHI | 5 |