Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Pravin K. Johri

dblp:22/4342 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1993
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Transport protocols and congestion control · 91% Network performance modeling · 9%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Transport protocols and congestion control › transport protocols
flow and error control
0.011993
Error and flow control performance of a high speed protocol · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1993
Transport protocols and congestion control › error control › automatic repeat request
go-back-n
0.011993
Error and flow control performance of a high speed protocol · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1993
Transport protocols and congestion control › error control › automatic repeat request
selective repeat ARQ
0.011993
Error and flow control performance of a high speed protocol · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1993
Network performance modeling
throughput analysis
0.011993
Error and flow control performance of a high speed protocol · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1993

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

analysis and simulation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1993 Error and flow control performance of a high speed protocol
abstract
The performance of the SNR protocol of A. N. Netravali et al. (1990) is studied when it is implemented for end-to-end flow and error control. Using a combination of analysis and simulation, the efficiency with which this protocol uses the network bandwidth and its achievable throughput is evaluated as a function of certain network and protocol parameters. The protocol is enhanced by introducing two windows to decouple the two functions of receiver flow control and network congestion control. This enhancement and the original protocol are compared with go-back-N (GBN) and one-at-a-time-selective-repeat (OSR) retransmission procedures, are shown to have significantly higher throughput for a wide range of network conditions. As an example, for a virtual circuit with 60-ms roundtrip delay and 10/sup -8/ bit error rate, in order to deliver 500 Mb/s throughput, both the GBN and OSR require a raw transmission bandwidth of approximately 800 Mb/s, whereas SNR with two windows needs slightly higher than 500 Mb/s raw bandwidth. Periodic exchange of state can also provide a variety of measures for congestion control in a timely and accurate fashion.>
Bharat T. Doshi, Pravin K. Johri, Arun N. Netravali, Krishan K. Sabnani
IEEE Trans. Commun.2
1992 Communication Protocols for High Speed Packet Networks
Bharat T. Doshi, Pravin K. Johri
Comput. Networks ISDN Syst.2