Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Vivek G. Moudgal

dblp:22/4738 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1995
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Motion planning and robot control · 77% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 23%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › flexible manipulator control
flexible link robot control
0.011994
Expert Supervisory Control for a Two-Link Flexible Robot · ICRA 1994
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › intelligent control
fuzzy control
0.011994
Expert Supervisory Control for a Two-Link Flexible Robot · ICRA 1994
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.011994
Expert Supervisory Control for a Two-Link Flexible Robot · ICRA 1994
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › hierarchical control
supervisory control
0.011994
Expert Supervisory Control for a Two-Link Flexible Robot · ICRA 1994
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
vibration suppression
0.011994
Expert Supervisory Control for a Two-Link Flexible Robot · ICRA 1994

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

rule-based control · 0.0fuzzy control · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1995 Fuzzy learning control for a flexible-link robot
abstract
There are two main drawbacks in fuzzy control: 1) the design of fuzzy controllers is usually performed in an ad hoc manner where it is often difficult to choose some of the controller parameters; and 2) the fuzzy controller constructed for the nominal plant may later perform inadequately if significant and unpredictable plant parameter variations occur. In this paper we illustrate these two problems on a two-link flexible robot testbed by: 1) developing, implementing, and evaluating a fuzzy controller for the robotic mechanism, and 2) illustrating that payload variations can have negative effects on the performance of a well designed fuzzy control system. Next, we show how to develop and implement a fuzzy model reference learning controller for the flexible robot and illustrate that it can automatically synthesize a rule-base for a fuzzy controller that will achieve comparable performance to the case where it was manually constructed, and automatically tune the fuzzy controller so that it can adapt to variations in the payload.>
Vivek G. Moudgal, Waihon A. Kwong, Kevin M. Passino, Stephen Yurkovich
IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst.1
1994 Expert Supervisory Control for a Two-Link Flexible Robot
abstract
This investigation focuses on the design and implementation of rule-based controllers for end point position control of a two-degree-of-freedom robot with very flexible links. We begin by showing how our intuitive understanding of how to control the robot, that was gained over several years of experience, can be used in the construction of a direct fuzzy controller Next, we investigate the use of a two-level hierarchical rule-based controller with a simple upper-level "expert controller" that captures our knowledge about how to supervise the application of lower-level fuzzy controllers during movements in the robot workspace. Overall, the rule-based supervisory control results have proven to be extremely effective for vibration suppression in the laboratory test bed of this study comparing favorably (in terms of performance, design complexity, and implementation issues) to a variety of conventional techniques attempted to date.>
Vivek G. Moudgal, Kevin M. Passino, Stephen Yurkovich
ICRA1