Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Salil Deshpande

dblp:22/5122 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 33% Efficient and distributed learning · 33% Language models and text generation · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
active learning
0.612022
Active Learning Helps Pretrained Models Learn the Intended Task · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
pre-trained models
0.612022
Active Learning Helps Pretrained Models Learn the Intended Task · NeurIPS 2022
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
task ambiguity
0.612022
Active Learning Helps Pretrained Models Learn the Intended Task · NeurIPS 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

uncertainty sampling · 0.6active learning · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Active Learning Helps Pretrained Models Learn the Intended Task
abstract
Models can fail in unpredictable ways during deployment due to task ambiguity, when multiple behaviors are consistent with the provided training data. An example is an object classifier trained on red squares and blue circles: when encountering blue squares, the intended behavior is undefined. We investigate whether pretrained models are better active learners, capable of disambiguating between the possible tasks a user may be trying to specify. Intriguingly, we find that better active learning is an emergent property of the pretraining process: pretrained models require up to 5 times fewer labels when using uncertainty-based active learning, while non-pretrained models see no or even negative benefit. We find these gains come from an ability to select examples with attributes that disambiguate the intended behavior, such as rare product categories or atypical backgrounds. These attributes are far more linearly separable in pretrained model's representation spaces vs non-pretrained models, suggesting a possible mechanism for this behavior.
Alex Tamkin, Salil Deshpande, Jesse Mu, Noah D. Goodman
NeurIPS3