Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Salil Deshpande
dblp:22/5122
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 33% Efficient and distributed learning · 33% Language models and text generation · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
active learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Active Learning Helps Pretrained Models Learn the Intended Task · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
pre-trained models |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Active Learning Helps Pretrained Models Learn the Intended Task · NeurIPS 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
task ambiguity |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Active Learning Helps Pretrained Models Learn the Intended Task · NeurIPS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
uncertainty sampling · 0.6active learning · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Active Learning Helps Pretrained Models Learn the Intended TaskabstractModels can fail in unpredictable ways during deployment due to task ambiguity, when multiple behaviors are consistent with the provided training data. An example is an object classifier trained on red squares and blue circles: when encountering blue squares, the intended behavior is undefined. We investigate whether pretrained models are better active learners, capable of disambiguating between the possible tasks a user may be trying to specify. Intriguingly, we find that better active learning is an emergent property of the pretraining process: pretrained models require up to 5 times fewer labels when using uncertainty-based active learning, while non-pretrained models see no or even negative benefit. We find these gains come from an ability to select examples with attributes that disambiguate the intended behavior, such as rare product categories or atypical backgrounds. These attributes are far more linearly separable in pretrained model's representation spaces vs non-pretrained models, suggesting a possible mechanism for this behavior. Alex Tamkin, Salil Deshpande, Jesse Mu, Noah D. Goodman |
NeurIPS | 3 |