Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hendra Setiawan

dblp:22/5447 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
18ranked-venue papers
15as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 16 · 13 first-author · 2 since 2021Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
7 papers
Machine translation · 65% Language models and text generation · 27% Generative modeling · 4%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Geometric modeling and processing · 100%

Topics — the 14 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
tokenization
0.912025
Beyond Text Compression: Evaluating Tokenizers Across Scales · ACL (1) 2025
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
statistical machine translation
0.532015
Statistical Machine Translation Features with Multitask Tensor Networks · ACL (1) 2015
Anchor Graph: Global Reordering Contexts for Statistical Machine Translation · EMNLP 2013
Discriminative Word Alignment with a Function Word Reordering Model · EMNLP 2010
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
neural machine translation
0.412020
Variational Neural Machine Translation with Normalizing Flows · ACL 2020
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › neural machine translation
variational neural machine translation
0.412020
Variational Neural Machine Translation with Normalizing Flows · ACL 2020
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
global context modeling
0.212013
Anchor Graph: Global Reordering Contexts for Statistical Machine Translation · EMNLP 2013
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › statistical machine translation
reordering model
0.212013
Anchor Graph: Global Reordering Contexts for Statistical Machine Translation · EMNLP 2013
Machine learning › Generative modeling
normalizing flow
0.112020
Variational Neural Machine Translation with Normalizing Flows · ACL 2020
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › statistical machine translation › word alignment
discriminative word alignment
0.112010
Discriminative Word Alignment with a Function Word Reordering Model · EMNLP 2010
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › statistical machine translation
word alignment
0.112010
Discriminative Word Alignment with a Function Word Reordering Model · EMNLP 2010
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › statistical machine translation
hierarchical phrase-based translation
0.112009
Topological Ordering of Function Words in Hierarchical Phrase-based Translation · ACL/IJCNLP 2009
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › statistical machine translation
phrase-based translation
0.112007
Ordering Phrases with Function Words · ACL 2007
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multi-task learning
0.112015
Statistical Machine Translation Features with Multitask Tensor Networks · ACL (1) 2015
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
syntactic parsing
0.122009
Topological Ordering of Function Words in Hierarchical Phrase-based Translation · ACL/IJCNLP 2009
Ordering Phrases with Function Words · ACL 2007
Geometric modeling and processing
surface reconstruction
0.012013
Two-Neighbor Orientation Model with Cross-Boundary Global Contexts · ACL (1) 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

zipf's law · 0.9scaling consistency · 0.9variational inference · 0.4transformer · 0.4normalizing flow · 0.4tensor network · 0.2neural network features · 0.2multi-task learning · 0.2graph-based modeling · 0.2cross-boundary global context · 0.2discriminative training · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Beyond Text Compression: Evaluating Tokenizers Across Scales
abstract
The choice of tokenizer can profoundly impact language model performance, yet accessible and reliable evaluations of tokenizer quality remain an open challenge.Inspired by scaling consistency, we show that smaller models can accurately predict significant differences in tokenizer impact on larger models at a fraction of the compute cost.By systematically evaluating both English-centric and multilingual tokenizers, we find that tokenizer choice has negligible effects on tasks in English but results in consistent performance differences in multilingual settings.We propose new intrinsic tokenizer metrics inspired by Zipf's law that correlate more strongly with downstream performance than text compression when modeling unseen languages.By combining several metrics to capture multiple aspects of tokenizer behavior, we develop a reliable framework for intrinsic tokenizer evaluations.Our work offers a more efficient path to informed tokenizer selection in future language model development.
Jonas F. Lotz, António V. Lopes, Stephan Peitz, Hendra Setiawan, Leonardo Emili
ACL (1)4
2024 Accurate Knowledge Distillation via n-best Reranking
abstract
We propose utilizing n-best reranking to enhance Sequence-Level Knowledge Distillation (Kim and Rush, 2016) where we extract pseudolabels for student model's training data from top n-best hypotheses and leverage a diverse set of models with different inductive biases, objective functions or architectures, including some publicly-available large language models, to pick the highest-quality hypotheses as labels.The effectiveness of our proposal is validated through experiments on the WMT'21 German ↔ English and Chinese ↔ English translation tasks.Our results demonstrate that utilizing pseudo-labels generated by our n-best reranker leads to a significantly more accurate student model.In fact, our best student model achieves comparable accuracy to a large translation model from (Tran et al., 2021) with 4.7 billion parameters, while having two orders of magnitude fewer parameters.
Hendra Setiawan
NAACL-HLT1
2020 Variational Neural Machine Translation with Normalizing Flows
abstract
Variational Neural Machine Translation (VNMT) is an attractive framework for modeling the generation of target translations, conditioned not only on the source sentence but also on some latent random variables.The latent variable modeling may introduce useful statistical dependencies that can improve translation accuracy.Unfortunately, learning informative latent variables is non-trivial, as the latent space can be prohibitively large, and the latent codes are prone to be ignored by many translation models at training time.Previous works impose strong assumptions on the distribution of the latent code and limit the choice of the NMT architecture.In this paper, we propose to apply the VNMT framework to the state-of-the-art Transformer and introduce a more flexible approximate posterior based on normalizing flows.We demonstrate the efficacy of our proposal under both in-domain and out-of-domain conditions, significantly outperforming strong baselines.
Hendra Setiawan, Matthias Sperber, Udhyakumar Nallasamy, Matthias Paulik
ACL1
2020 Consistent Transcription and Translation of Speech
Matthias Sperber, Hendra Setiawan, Christian Gollan, Udhay Nallasamy, Matthias Paulik
Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics2
2018 BBN's low-resource machine translation for the LoReHLT 2016 evaluation
Hendra Setiawan, Zhongqiang Huang, Rabih Zbib
Mach. Transl.1
2015 Statistical Machine Translation Features with Multitask Tensor Networks
abstract
We present a three-pronged approach to improving Statistical Machine Translation (SMT), building on recent success in the application of neural networks to SMT. First, we propose new features based on neural networks to model various non-local translation phenomena. Second, we augment the architecture of the neural network with tensor layers that capture important higher-order interaction among the network units. Third, we apply multitask learning to estimate the neural network parameters jointly. Each of our proposed methods results in significant improvements that are complementary. The overall improvement is +2.7 and +1.8 BLEU points for Arabic-English and Chinese-English translation over a state-of-the-art system that already includes neural network features.
Hendra Setiawan, Zhongqiang Huang, Jacob Devlin, Thomas Lamar, Rabih Zbib, Richard M. Schwartz, John Makhoul
ACL (1)1
2013 Two-Neighbor Orientation Model with Cross-Boundary Global Contexts
Hendra Setiawan, Bowen Zhou 0006, Bing Xiang, Libin Shen
ACL (1)1
2013 Anchor Graph: Global Reordering Contexts for Statistical Machine Translation
abstract
Reordering poses one of the greatest challenges in Statistical Machine Translation research as the key contextual information may well be beyond the confine of translation units.We present the "Anchor Graph" (AG) model where we use a graph structure to model global contextual information that is crucial for reordering.The key ingredient of our AG model is the edges that capture the relationship between the reordering around a set of selected translation units, which we refer to as anchors.As the edges link anchors that may span multiple translation units at decoding time, our AG model effectively encodes global contextual information that is previously absent.We integrate our proposed model into a state-of-the-art translation system and demonstrate the efficacy of our proposal in a largescale Chinese-to-English translation task.* This work was done when the authors were with IBM. 1 We define translation units as phrases in phrase-based SMT or as translation rules in syntax-based SMT.
Hendra Setiawan, Bowen Zhou 0006, Bing Xiang
EMNLP1
2013 Discriminative Training of 150 Million Translation Parameters and Its Application to Pruning
Hendra Setiawan
HLT-NAACL1
2011 LTE Physical Layer Identity Detection: Frequency vs Time Domain Schemes
abstract
Long Term Evolution (LTE) physical layer identity can be recognized either in frequency domain or time domain. In this paper we serve some comparisons in term of complexity, latency, and recognition probability. As a result, frequency domain detection has superiority on performance for SNR higher than 3dB on all channel models, as well as lower latency than time domain scheme one. However, it requires huge computation resources that might meet difficulty for mobile devices implementation.
Hendra Setiawan, Masayuki Kurosaki, Hiroshi Ochi
ICC1
2010 Discriminative Word Alignment with a Function Word Reordering Model
Hendra Setiawan, Chris Dyer, Philip Resnik
EMNLP1
2010 Generalizing Hierarchical Phrase-based Translation using Rules with Adjacent Nonterminals
Hendra Setiawan, Philip Resnik
HLT-NAACL1
2010 An optimum RTL design of time domain auto-correlation architecture for WiMAX OFDMA and 3GPP LTE cooperative system
abstract
This paper discusses about RTL design of time domain auto-correlation architecture for two recent standards, i.e.Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access (WiMAX OFDMA) and 3rd Generation Partnership Project Long Term Evolution (3GPP LTE). We introduce time domain auto-correlation function to recognize WiMAX preamble and LTE primary synchronization channel (PSC) at the same time. To distinguish them from interference, we consider peak period as unique property of WiMAX's preamble and LTE's PSC. As a result, for SNR 0 dB in extended pedestrian A (EPA) and ITU pedestrian B channel models, more than 90% WiMAX's preamble as well as LTE's PSC can be detected correctly. From complexity point of view, our scheme requires 183k LUT when implemented into Xilinx4 xc4vlx200.
Hendra Setiawan, Hiroshi Ochi
PIMRC1
2009 Topological Ordering of Function Words in Hierarchical Phrase-based Translation
Hendra Setiawan, Min-Yen Kan, Haizhou Li 0001, Philip Resnik
ACL/IJCNLP1
2007 Ordering Phrases with Function Words
Hendra Setiawan, Min-Yen Kan, Haizhou Li 0001
ACL1
2005 Phrase-Based Statistical Machine Translation: A Level of Detail Approach
Hendra Setiawan, Haizhou Li 0001, Min Zhang 0005, Beng Chin Ooi
IJCNLP1
2005 A Phrase-Based Context-Dependent Joint Probability Model for Named Entity Translation
Min Zhang 0005, Haizhou Li 0001, Jian Su 0002, Hendra Setiawan
IJCNLP4
2005 Learning Phrase Translation using Level of Detail Approach
abstract
We propose a simplified Level Of Detail (LOD) algorithm to learn phrase translation for statistical machine translation. In particular, LOD learns unknown phrase translations from parallel texts without linguistic knowledge. LOD uses an agglomerative method to attack the combinatorial explosion that results when generating candidate phrase translations. Although LOD was previously proposed by (Setiawan et al., 2005), we improve the original algorithm in two ways: simplifying the algorithm and using a simpler translation model. Experimental results show that our algorithm provides comparable performance while demonstrating a significant reduction in computation time.
Hendra Setiawan, Haizhou Li 0001, Min Zhang 0005
MTSummit1