Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shyam Subramanian
dblp:22/5844
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Information extraction and text analysis · 87% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 13% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
fact-checking |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Hierarchical Evidence Set Modeling for Automated Fact Extraction and Verification · EMNLP (1) 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › fact-checking
fact extraction and verification |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Hierarchical Evidence Set Modeling for Automated Fact Extraction and Verification · EMNLP (1) 2020 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge acquisition › knowledge extraction
fact extraction |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Hierarchical Evidence Set Modeling for Automated Fact Extraction and Verification · EMNLP (1) 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
hierarchical attention · 0.4evidence set modeling · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Hierarchical Evidence Set Modeling for Automated Fact Extraction and VerificationabstractAutomated fact extraction and verification is a challenging task that involves finding relevant evidence sentences from a reliable corpus to verify the truthfulness of a claim.Existing models either (i) concatenate all the evidence sentences, leading to the inclusion of redundant and noisy information; or (ii) process each claim-evidence sentence pair separately and aggregate all of them later, missing the early combination of related sentences for more accurate claim verification.Unlike the prior works, in this paper, we propose Hierarchical Evidence Set Modeling (HESM), a framework to extract evidence sets (each of which may contain multiple evidence sentences), and verify a claim to be supported, refuted or not enough info, by encoding and attending the claim and evidence sets at different levels of hierarchy.Our experimental results show that HESM outperforms 7 state-of-the-art methods for fact extraction and claim verification.Our source code is available at https://github.com/ ShyamSubramanian/HESM. Shyam Subramanian, Kyumin Lee |
EMNLP (1) | 1 |
| 2007 | 2-MITE Product-of-Power-Law NetworksabstractA 2-MITE is a multiple-input translinear element with two input gates. In this paper, different properties of networks of 2-MITEs are derived, especially in the case of product-of-power-law (POPL) networks, in which the output currents are products of the inputs raised to different powers. It is found that conditions ensuring the uniqueness and stability of the operating point in 2-MITE networks are less stringent than those for MITE networks with higher number of input gates. This simplifies the synthesis of these networks considerably. A graph-theoretic approach to the analysis of 2-MITE networks is presented. Necessary conditions for a set of power-law equations to be implementable by 2-MITE networks are derived. Sufficient conditions for the same are presented for the case of POPL networks with one output Shyam Subramanian, David V. Anderson |
ISCAS | 1 |
| 2007 | Optimal Synthesis of MITE Translinear LoopsabstractA procedure for synthesizing multiple-input translinear element (MITE) networks that implement a given system of translinear-loop equations (STLE) is presented. The minimum number of MITEs required for implementing the STLE, which is equal to the number of current variables in the STLE, is attained. The number of input gates of the MITEs is minimal amongst those MITE networks that satisfy the STLE and have the minimum number of MITEs. The synthesized MITE networks have a unique operating point and, in many cases, the network is guaranteed to be stable in a particular sense. This synthesis procedure exploits the relationship between MITE product-of-power-law (POPL) networks and linear diophantine equations which is explored in detail here. Shyam Subramanian, David V. Anderson, Paul E. Hasler, Bradley A. Minch |
ISCAS | 1 |