Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Raghavendra Udupa

dblp:22/5855 · also Raghavendra Udupa U. · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
27ranked-venue papers
11as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 18 · 8 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 9 · 4 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 6 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
7 papers
Information retrieval · 100%
Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Efficient and distributed learning · 44% Representation and self-supervised learning · 31% Machine translation · 12%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Usability and user experience research · 100%

Topics — the 26 heaviest of 28, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › document retrieval › domain-specific retrieval
email search
0.522016
InLook: Revisiting Email Search Experience · SIGIR 2016
On Correcting Misspelled Queries in Email Search · AAAI 2015
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression
0.312017
ProtoNN: Compressed and Accurate kNN for Resource-scarce Devices · ICML 2017
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
prototype learning
0.312017
ProtoNN: Compressed and Accurate kNN for Resource-scarce Devices · ICML 2017
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › inference efficiency
resource-constrained inference
0.312017
ProtoNN: Compressed and Accurate kNN for Resource-scarce Devices · ICML 2017
Information retrieval
search engines
0.212016
InLook: Revisiting Email Search Experience · SIGIR 2016
Usability and user experience research
search experience
0.212016
InLook: Revisiting Email Search Experience · SIGIR 2016
Information retrieval
query processing
0.212015
On Correcting Misspelled Queries in Email Search · AAAI 2015
Information retrieval › query processing
query spelling correction
0.212015
On Correcting Misspelled Queries in Email Search · AAAI 2015
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › word representation › word embedding
bilingual word embedding
0.112011
Improving Bilingual Projections via Sparse Covariance Matrices · EMNLP 2011
Information retrieval
hashing
0.112011
Learning Hash Functions for Cross-View Similarity Search · IJCAI 2011
Information retrieval › hashing › binary code learning
learned hash functions
0.112011
Learning Hash Functions for Cross-View Similarity Search · IJCAI 2011
Information retrieval
similarity search
0.112011
Learning Hash Functions for Cross-View Similarity Search · IJCAI 2011
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › transliteration
transliteration mining
0.112010
PR + RQ ALMOST EQUAL TO PQ: Transliteration Mining Using Bridge Language · AAAI 2010
Information retrieval › search engines › semantic search › entity retrieval
people search
0.112010
Multilingual people search · SIGIR 2010
Information retrieval › relevance feedback
pseudo-relevance feedback
0.112010
Investigating the suboptimality and instability of pseudo-relevance feedback · SIGIR 2010
Information retrieval › query reformulation
query expansion
0.112010
Investigating the suboptimality and instability of pseudo-relevance feedback · SIGIR 2010
Information retrieval
query suggestion
0.112010
Suggesting related topics in web search · SIGIR 2010
Information retrieval › query understanding
spelling correction
0.112010
Hashing-Based Approaches to Spelling Correction of Personal Names · EMNLP 2010
Information retrieval › query formulation
term selection
0.112010
Investigating the suboptimality and instability of pseudo-relevance feedback · SIGIR 2010
Information retrieval
web search
0.112010
Suggesting related topics in web search · SIGIR 2010
Information retrieval
personalized search
0.112015
On Correcting Misspelled Queries in Email Search · AAAI 2015
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
alignment
0.112005
Theory of Alignment Generators and Applications to Statistical Machine Translation · IJCAI 2005
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
statistical machine translation
0.112005
Theory of Alignment Generators and Applications to Statistical Machine Translation · IJCAI 2005
Information retrieval
evaluation
0.012010
Investigating the suboptimality and instability of pseudo-relevance feedback · SIGIR 2010
Information retrieval › evaluation
retrieval effectiveness
0.012010
Investigating the suboptimality and instability of pseudo-relevance feedback · SIGIR 2010
Information retrieval › search engines
search result analysis
0.012010
Suggesting related topics in web search · SIGIR 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sparse projection · 0.3k-nearest neighbors · 0.3joint discriminative learning · 0.3machine learning · 0.2hashing · 0.2sparse covariance matrix estimation · 0.1oracle term selection · 0.1multilingual search · 0.1demonstration system · 0.1canonical correlation analysis · 0.1alignment generators · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 ProtoNN: Compressed and Accurate kNN for Resource-scarce Devices
abstract
Several real-world applications require real-time prediction on resource-scarce devices such as an Internet of Things (IoT) sensor. Such applications demand prediction models with small storage and computational complexity that do not compromise significantly on accuracy. In this work, we propose ProtoNN, a novel algorithm that addresses the problem of real-time and accurate prediction on resource-scarce devices. ProtoNN is inspired by k-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) but has several orders lower storage and prediction complexity. ProtoNN models can be deployed even on devices with puny storage and computational power (e.g. an Arduino UNO with 2kB RAM) to get excellent prediction accuracy. ProtoNN derives its strength from three key ideas: a) learning a small number of prototypes to represent the entire training set, b) sparse low dimensional projection of data, c) joint discriminative learning of the projection and prototypes with explicit model size constraint. We conduct systematic empirical evaluation of ProtoNN on a variety of supervised learning tasks (binary, multi-class, multi-label classification) and show that it gives nearly state-of-the-art prediction accuracy on resource-scarce devices while consuming several orders lower storage, and using minimal working memory.
Arun Suggala, Harsha Vardhan Simhadri, Bhargavi Paranjape, Ashish Kumar 0007, Saurabh Goyal, Raghavendra Udupa, Manik Varma, Prateek Jain 0002
ICML8
2016 A Framework for Task-specific Short Document Expansion
abstract
Collections that contain a large number of short texts are becoming increasingly common (eg., tweets, reviews, etc). Analytical tasks (such as classification, clustering, etc.) involving short texts could be challenging due to the lack of context and owing to their sparseness. An often encountered problem is low accuracy on the task. A standard technique used in the handling of short texts is expanding them before subjecting them to the task. However, existing works on short text expansion suffer from certain limitations: (i) they depend on domain knowledge to expand the text; (ii) they employ task-specific heuristics; and (iii) the expansion procedure is tightly coupled to the task. This makes it hard to adapt a procedure, designed for one task, into another. We present an expansion technique -- TIDE (Task-specIfic short Document Expansion) -- that can be applied on several Machine Learning, NLP and Information Retrieval tasks on short texts (such as short text classification, clustering, entity disambiguation, and the like) without using task specific heuristics and domain-specific knowledge for expansion. At the same time, our technique is capable of learning to expand short texts in a task-specific way. That is, the same technique that is applied to expand a short text in two different tasks is able to learn to produce different expansions depending upon what expansion benefits the task's performance. To speed up the learning process, we also introduce a technique called block learning. Our experiments with classification and clustering tasks show that our framework improves upon several baselines according to the standard evaluation metrics which includes the accuracy and normalized mutual information (NMI).
Ramakrishna Bairi, Raghavendra Udupa, Ganesh Ramakrishnan
CIKM2
2016 InLook: Revisiting Email Search Experience
abstract
Emails continue to remain the most important and widely used mode of online communication despite having its origins in the middle of last century and being threatened by a variety of online communication innovations. While several studies have predicted the continuous growth of volume of email communication, there is little innovation on improving the search in emails, an imperative part of the user experience. In this work, we present a lightweight email application codenamed InLook, that intends to provide a productive search experience.
Pranav Ramarao, Suresh Parthasarathy Iyengar, Pushkar V. Chitnis, Raghavendra Udupa, Balasubramanyan Ashok
SIGIR4
2015 On Correcting Misspelled Queries in Email Search
abstract
We consider the problem of providing spelling corrections for misspelled queries in Email Search using user’s own mail data. A popular strategy for general query spelling correction is to generate corrections from query logs. However, this strategy is not effective in Email Search for two reasons: 1) query log of any sin- gle user is typically not rich enough to provide potential corrections for a new query 2) corrections generated us- ing query logs of other users are not particularly useful since the mail data as well as search intent are highly specific to the user. We address the challenge of design- ing an effective spelling correction algorithm for Email Search in the absence of query logs. We propose SpEQ, a Machine Learning based approach that generates cor- rections for misspelled queries directly from the user’s own mail data.
Abhijit Bhole, Raghavendra Udupa
AAAI2
2012 Incorporating Lexical Priors into Topic Models
Jagadeesh Jagarlamudi, Hal Daumé III, Raghavendra Udupa
EACL3
2012 An Empirical Study of the Occurrence and Co-Occurrence of Named Entities in Natural Language Corpora
K. Saravanan 0001, Monojit Choudhury, Raghavendra Udupa, A. Kumaran 0001
LREC3
2011 Improving Bilingual Projections via Sparse Covariance Matrices
Jagadeesh Jagarlamudi, Raghavendra Udupa, Hal Daumé III, Abhijit Bhole
EMNLP2
2011 Learning Hash Functions for Cross-View Similarity Search
Shaishav Kumar, Raghavendra Udupa
IJCAI2
2010 PR + RQ ALMOST EQUAL TO PQ: Transliteration Mining Using Bridge Language
abstract
We address the problem of mining name transliterations from comparable corpora in languages P and Q in the following resource-poor scenario:Parallel names in PQ are not available for training. Parallel names in PR and RQ are available for training.We propose a novel solution for the problem by computing a common geometric feature space for P,Q and R where name transliterations are mapped to similar vectors. We employ Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA) to compute the common geometric feature space using only parallel names in PR and RQ and without requiring parallel names in PQ. We test our algorithm on data sets in several languages and show that it gives results comparable to the state-of-the-art transliteration mining algorithms that use parallel names in PQ for training.
Mitesh M. Khapra, Raghavendra Udupa, A. Kumaran 0001, Pushpak Bhattacharyya
AAAI2
2010 On Improving Pseudo-Relevance Feedback Using Pseudo-Irrelevant Documents
Karthik Raman 0001, Raghavendra Udupa, Pushpak Bhattacharyya, Abhijit Bhole
ECIR2
2010 Transliteration Equivalence Using Canonical Correlation Analysis
Raghavendra Udupa, Mitesh M. Khapra
ECIR1
2010 Hashing-Based Approaches to Spelling Correction of Personal Names
Raghavendra Udupa, Shaishav Kumar
EMNLP1
2010 Improving the Multilingual User Experience of Wikipedia Using Cross-Language Name Search
Raghavendra Udupa, Mitesh M. Khapra
HLT-NAACL1
2010 Multilingual people search
abstract
People Search is an important search service with multiple applications (eg. looking up a friend on Facebook, finding colleagues in corporate email directories etc). With the proportion of non-English users on a steady rise, people search services are being used by users from diverse language demographics. Users may issue name search queries against these directories in languages other than the language of the directory, in which case the present monolingual name search approaches will not work. In this demo, we present a Multilingual People Search system capable of performing fast name lookups on large user directories, independent of the directory language. Our system has applications in areas like social networking, enterprise search and email address book search.
Shaishav Kumar, Raghavendra Udupa
SIGIR2
2010 Suggesting related topics in web search
abstract
Suggesting topics that are related to user's goal or interest is very important in web search. However, search engines today focus on suggesting mainly reformulations and lexical variants of the query mined from query logs. In this demonstration, we show a system that can suggest related topics for a query based on the top search results for the query. It can help users in exploring the topics related to their information need. The topic suggestion system can be integrated with any search engine or it can be easily installed on the client machine as a browser plugin.
Santosh Raju, Shaishav Kumar, Raghavendra Udupa
SIGIR3
2010 Investigating the suboptimality and instability of pseudo-relevance feedback
abstract
Although Pseudo-Relevance Feedback (PRF) techniques improve average retrieval performance at the price of high variance, not much is known about their optimality and the reasons for their instability. In this work, we study more than 800 topics from several test collections including the TREC Robust Track and show that PRF techniques are highly suboptimal, i.e. they do not make the fullest utilization of pseudo-relevant documents and under-perform. A careful selection of expansion terms from the pseudo-relevant document with the help of an oracle can actually improve retrieval performance dramatically (by > 60%). Further, we show that instability in PRF techniques is mainly due to wrong selection of expansion terms from the pseudo-relevant documents. Our findings emphasize the need to revisit the problem of term selection to make a break through in PRF.
Raghavendra Udupa, Abhijit Bhole
SIGIR1
2009 MINT: A Method for Effective and Scalable Mining of Named Entity Transliterations from Large Comparable Corpora
Raghavendra Udupa, K. Saravanan 0001, A. Kumaran 0001, Jagadeesh Jagarlamudi
EACL1
2009 "They Are Out There, If You Know Where to Look": Mining Transliterations of OOV Query Terms for Cross-Language Information Retrieval
Raghavendra Udupa, K. Saravanan 0001, Anton Bakalov, Abhijit Bhole
ECIR1
2008 Mining named entity transliteration equivalents from comparable corpora
abstract
No abstract available.
Raghavendra Udupa, K. Saravanan 0001, A. Kumaran 0001, Jagadeesh Jagarlamudi
CIKM1
2007 Generative models of noisy translations with applications to parallel fragment extraction
Chris Quirk, Raghavendra Udupa, Arul Menezes
MTSummit2
2006 Computational Complexity of Statistical Machine Translation
Raghavendra Udupa, Hemanta K. Maji
EACL1
2005 Theory of Alignment Generators and Applications to Statistical Machine Translation
Raghavendra Udupa, Hemanta K. Maji
IJCAI1
2004 An Algorithmic Framework for Solving the Decoding Problem in Statistical Machine Translation
Raghavendra Udupa, Tanveer A. Faruquie, Hemanta K. Maji
COLING1
2004 An English-Hindi Statistical Machine Translation System
Raghavendra Udupa, Tanveer A. Faruquie
IJCNLP1
2000 Register Efficient Mergesorting
Abhiram G. Ranade, Sonal Kothari, Raghavendra Udupa
HiPC3
2000 Hierarchical Partitioned Least Squares Filter-Bank for Fingerprint Enhancement
abstract
It is desirable to enhance the fingerprint image for achieving good fingerprint matching performance. In our earlier work, we have proposed a method for learning a set of partitioned least-squares filters from a given set of images and ground truth pairs. In this paper, we propose a refined approach to learn a class of hierarchical filter banks to extend our enhancement technique. The new technique is shown to obtain much better results particularly when the input image is not easily restored using our earlier technique. We evaluate the performance of our new approach to fingerprint enhancement filter design by assessing the effect of enhancement on performance of (i) fingerprint feature extraction and (ii) fingerprint matching.
Sugata Ghosal, Raghavendra Udupa, Nalini K. Ratha, Sharath Pankanti
ICPR2
2000 Learning partitioned least squares filters for fingerprint enhancement
abstract
Fingerprint images contain varying amount of noise because of the limitations of the fingerprint acquisition process. It is often necessary to enhance such noisy fingerprint images so that the features extracted from them are reliable. We propose a novel approach to fingerprint enhancement where a set of filters are learned using the "learn-from-example" paradigm. An expert provides the ground truth information for ridges in a small set of representative fingerprint images. The space of local fingerprint patterns in a small neighborhood is partitioned into a set of expressive yet computationally simple classes. A filter is learnt for each partition by finding the optimal linear mapping (in least-square sense) from the input to the enhanced space. The proposed approach offers distinct performance and speed advantages for a wide variety of fingerprint images.
Sugata Ghosal, Raghavendra Udupa, Sharath Pankanti, Nalini K. Ratha
WACV2